• null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    If this thread is like the others, there are no demands but a strong intention to express general discontent.

      • C126@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Don’t worry. The protest won’t matter at all and a large majority won’t even hear about it. Gives layabouts an excuse to layabout some more.

        • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Don’t worry. The protest won’t matter at all and a large majority won’t even hear about it.

          But that’s precisely what worries me, people spending effort that goes to waste instead of organizing something that effects a change

      • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        In my experience, in my country, a protest without a clear goal is a quick way for right wings to rally people with their agenda.

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yeah that’s a really good point.

        The general consensus seems to be that doing something is better than doing nothing.

        I really disagree though. After a few failed attempts people will lose heart and get in line.

        There seems to be half a dozen different protests now too, all on different days with no cohesive objectives

        • tetris11@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          with no cohesive objectives

          That’s a pro. As soon as there’s a clear motif or leader, it’s very easy to undermine that single point of weakness. A general rabble sends the clear vibe of “we are not impressed, and might burn things” with the air of uncertainty to keep the powers that be on their toes.

          • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            Well I guess you can’t undermine a protest that isn’t protesting anything but that still doesn’t explain what the point of this non-protest protest is? How would a bunch of people not buying stuff for a day keep “the powers that be” (who? the capitalists? Their politicians? The police?) on their toes?

            • tetris11@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              “We saw a blip in <sale/metric/police safety> and we think it correlates with the general unhappiness of the populace, as displayed here, here, and maybe here.”

              Blips can cause panic, even small ones

              • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 days ago

                Is it supposed to hit profit margins? Because I doubt it will, people will still be buying necessities at the same amount and call me cynical, but I believe almost everyone will be buying the non-necessities the days before and after.

                To be candid, it just sounds like the most toothless, do-nothing, slacktivism kind of protest that’s only meant to generate backpats

                • tetris11@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  it could turn violent and do real damage to capital, that’s the beauty of an unfocused protest – the night is ever young