Both are useful in achieveing American political aims abroad, so getting rid of them seems like a bad choice from the perspective of the US government

  • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Because his racist hillbilly supporters have been led to believe 10 to 15% of the country’s budget is spend on poor not-white-enough freeloaders in other countries. It’s a populist move.

    • deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Dullard, you’re doing a great job, demonstrating the need to consider foreign policy and political economy as the main factor, beyond mere culture wars and all that.

      • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’m well aware of the controversial nature of USAID, and I don’t deny that it is possibly desirable to wind it down for moral reasons - although not like that, obviously.

        But I guarantee you Trump isn’t intelligent enough to consider that. He’s just wrecking it as visibly as possible to please his NASCAR-loving fan base.

        Musk on the other hand probably has other motives.

    • davel@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I don’t think that is a sufficient reason for it, but a fringe benefit of it and cover story for it.