

Oh, when I do point my disagreement of semi-feudalism, it’s more towards the so-called Maoists. I do have one IRL friend that’s like that and we do argue some about this position. It’s not a position to be dismissed, as the plight is real, the violence is real. I just believe that the reading of the super structure is different. If I want to rile this friend up, I usually quote Mao’s “On book worship”.
Anyways, happy studying!



Coming from Brazil, this is true: reformism is a dead end. But, what we’ve learned is that, properly put in perspective, electoralism can serve as a platform, although restricted.
For example, local elections are somewhat easy to win. Look at Mandani. The problem, I believe, is how easily he takes a more individualizing approach (“I did something good because there were individuals/groups asking”, rather than “X group needs Y policy because of Z problems that higher the rungs of the government couldn give two shits”). Making the situations less bad is good. The problem is that it’s defanging.
Not only that, his whole ethos is “compromise so we can govern”, so this will destroy everything. If a local politician could enable the people like “yeah, you know what? Fuck Big Tech” openly, it sure helps the masses feel a little more comfortable to protest Big Tech. And then, finally, the Party can better educate, coordinate and amass these people.
We, from the Brazillian left, are taking this lessons to heart, since the socdem vacuum kills. Try to learn this. Organize, plan on running elections if needed. Shit, even in China very little of the population is in the Party.