Source? Never heard of this
Source? Never heard of this
I wish. I just don’t think this is really an objective admission of guilt. He says a lot of stupid stuff, and a lot of those things are admissions of guilt. This could just be his usual rambling.
It could be true, but I do not think these words are conclusive
What he is saying there really isn’t an admission of voter fraud
I will say that I think the discourse around the 2000 elections is generally very flawed. The SC ruled that you cannot do recounts only of select counties, which is a ruling that is actually pretty fair and reasonable. Furthermore, Florida later did a full recount and Bush won the state.
I remember reading about that too, but it seems kind of contrived for two reasons.
First of all, we all know it’s very easy to lie with statistics. Even if the statistics did seem damning (which is debatable when I read it), that could be from manipulation.
Second, the scheme described would fall apart completely with even a SINGLE recount in ONE swing state. Even just a county wide recount would make the whole house of cards fall apart.
The fact that the current administration has done nothing about this, despite access to some of the best data, analysts, and intelligence in the world, seems to imply that it is most likely not true.
Edit: also the explanation for the hack is that a number of machines were captured and reverse engineered, then replaced only after a wide hack was figured out. If the machine and software are built remotely intelligently, that shouldn’t matter at all. You’re telling me that a state of the art voting machine, built for maximum security and audit power, isn’t built with that in mind? It’s possible but very unlikely.
I don’t think the star link thing would work. It’s encrypted… Right???
The crazy thing is that is clearly a bad and dumb idea and yet would be an improvement of our current system. That money would actually recirculate.