charlie [any]

It means that you will force people with your army and they have to do what you want while you think that the people are just all so dumb and don’t know that you forcing them down with violence is for their own good.

Do you ever critically read what you write? What countries does this overwhelmingly apply to? That’s rhetorical by the way, I know you won’t get it.

Yes, I was looking for something similar I had read. Their agricultural industrial base was very modern at the time built in tandem and reliant on Soviet influence and trade. That reliance on oil to power their industrial machines, when ripped away by shock therapy, was a huge blow, and directly leads to “…the implementation of international aid to the DPRK around 1995” which this article doesn’t address. By denying oil exports to the DPRK, the western block orchestrated the subsequent famines.

My reading of these events indicated that this was a fully intentional effect of ending oil exports to the DPRK during shock therapy.

Great Man Theory ascribes history to the actions of individual “great men.”

Failson analysis is no different. It’s just not a material or actionable analysis.

This is Trumps RussiaGate revenge tour, libs need to recognize that if they want to maneuver him

This feels a little too close to Great Man Theory

That’s exactly what it is