Would that fix our carbonmonoxide weakness?

Remember the episode when the Little Einsteins worked on the Little Manhattan Project and used Rocket to drop Little Boy on 350,000 unsuspecting civilians?

I need this version, I was just rewatching and my version just translates it as “Shocker”. It did go for “you’re not only a lolicon, you’re also an M (TL note: M is common Japanese slang for masochist)”.

Fuck, these files have been on my disk for 10 years. Is it too late to replace them now? Won’t they feel bad about being abandoned after living most of their lives on my computer?

Did you know that the type of a variable is determined by the frequency of plasma oscillations among the objects valence electrons?

As someone who knows Person F personally, but won’t mention their name here for privacy’s sake, their problem wasn’t so much that their comment was removed (for understanding’s sake, as you said, which is understandable), but that they were removed from the community entirely, even though it was only three days. Can you justify that, when there was no crime committed and Person F only happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time?

There are useful group names, but they differentiate between some general types of animals, or by their collective movement. A pack of wolves acts very different from a herd of zebras, but much the same as a pack of hyenas. So if you’re looking at a group of dog-like hunters from a large distance, you could call it a pack without knowing whether they’re wolves or hyenas. That makes it a word with a proper function, communicating exactly as much information as you need and no more.

Species-specific is just a meme, no one in their right mind would ever use them in real conversation, because “a parliament of chimps” would technically be redundant if “parliament” already meant “group of chimps”. But it doesn’t, obviously, so you’re forced to specify “chimps” anyway, making “parliament” useless and confusing.

I read it as the reverse initially. Thought it was a classic Lemmy take for what looked like a newspaper article. Why- who- how could someone know about the culture war and the class war and draw this conclusion? (Ed: she doesn’t know about the class war, see below)

Or maybe it’s a bait title and the body makes a completely different point, that’s probably the reason I’m looking at a picture of the title right now and not reading the whole article.

Edit: the article

Edit 2: It’s actually a kinda muddled argument she’s making. She’s using “class war” not in the sense a marxist might use, but to describe something a populist party would do, which is turning public anger towards a specific demographic to justify their political actions. She doesn’t want Labour to alienate the richer parts of its voter base by “bashing the most wealthy” or “punishing the rich”. But she doesn’t show that Labour would actually message it like that, just that they have plans that would tax wealthier people more, which seems perfectly Labour-like and not something they would need special messaging to justify. So if Labour wants to pivot away from a culture war and towards actual left-wing policy, that’s not “starting a class war”.

Tesla still got a bunch of scientific cred, more than Edison actually. Edison is known as the inventor of a consumer product, Tesla got the unit of magnetic flux named after him.

Actually, the comic names Lorentz, Minkowski, Hilbert, which aren’t household names like Einstein, but anyone who knows anything about relativity will still know their names and what they contributed. Who cares about being known as “some kinda smart feller” by a billion people if none of them actually know why you’re seen as smart. To them you’re about as significant as a character in a newspaper comic; an easy reference to make to show they’ve read a newspaper once.