What’s a goldfish and wrongly interpreted dnd rules doing up there?!?
Huh?
What’s a goldfish and wrongly interpreted dnd rules doing up there?!?
Devices with taiwanese chips will get tariffed too? Because this opens up a way to ourairce manufacturing so that the US doesn’t just buy chips and avoid the tariff.
Doesn’t this do the inverse of boosting local commerce?
It’s been a thing for a while with rolling distros, let’s hope the release based ones ship it and their the flatpak issues so most users can enjoy sharing the screen with friends soon.
It’s still free labor since besides reading the review papers, scientists are expected to read the relevant daily papers of their field. Try usually do it in their free time and expending some of it reading non curated papers and then writing a review takes out preious time.
Elsevier doesn’t even reward them with free subscriptions to their services, no, they work for free and then have to pay (uni pays for them) to read what they curated.
The only thing Elsevier has for it is the notoriety of their platform.
If arXiv had a way to curate the uploaded papers and voluntary reviews from researchers, Elsevier would be gone.
There’s a reason why researchers themselves publish their papers into the “pirate” hub since they aren’t allowed to publish it publicly legalyl (but are allowed to privately send you the paper if you contact them by email for example).
Yeah for sure there’s way more versatility in genshin impact than path of exile 2.
My god.
Levels are not the only expression of builds, there’s tons of ways to build a dnd class, it can vary tons on gear, character personality and feats. It’s just 20 levels though.
“Europe”, as if there weren’t several languages in Europe with different date formats per language…
This makes sense, most of that explanation in the screenshot reeks of novices working with something they don’t understand.
I have worked with Qt, it’s not that bad to be honest.
What cracked me up was all that copying blocks of code “because no one knows how anything works”.
That reeks of novices copying code without bothering to read it well, and since this work method is horrendous, no one stays enough to stablish a proper knowledge base.
And if it was, it’s the dems fault for not having a good enough platform to avoid this
/s
I would quote it or somehow explicitly indicate your sarcasm since it doesn’t translate well over text. You can edit post titles.
There’s a musk only commnity that the technology communities created for this very reason. Maybe you could try to redirect posts there.
As far as I know his account has not been banned. He admitted cheating yesterday and there’s no news on any ban. He was mentally banned in December but they reinstated his account. That’s before all the current drama so idk.
I wish there were news of his ban though.
What a way to insult a country twice in the same sentence.
What about the arrow indicates anything but the left lane of the right road merging INTO the centre lane of the right road? Its a literal lane change. I feel like you couldn’t have picked an easier real life example.
Edit: wait, that’s an Australian image! Sorry for the confusion. That’s not a lane merge but the right lane getting out of the road for an intersection that is not shown in the picture, right? The road also lets you incorporate again into the left side lane. It would have been obvious if I were to be driving there though. In fact, it looks like it’s one of those turns where you stop the car so it’s clearly an incorporation and you need to indicate.
Maybe you got confused by the “it’s clearly the left one” thing? I meant that in the image shown, it’s the left one who has to indicate because it’s the car that is incorporating into the other lane.
Edit2: I’m fucking blind. You are right, that’s a lane merge on the left side of the image and unless there are indications before they merge I would assume that the main lane (right side for almost all the world besides UK and Australia I guess, sorry again for the confusion) is the one that stays and the auxiliary lane is the one that’s to merge, so I would assume that the right lane indicates in your image. I agree that without prior indications it might get confusing.
Third fucking edit because I didn’t bother reading you link until now. Those are indications on who has to give way, not on who has to indicate (turn on the lights, which is what this post is about). Both of the examples have the lane that ends indicating the lane change with lights regardless of them having the right to go or giving way to the other car.
I have an example that is way more confusing right next to where I live, but we are taught on this literal curve when getting the license so there’s no doubting about it. For context, there are tons of arrows asking the left lane to change into the right for about 1KM before you reach this point so it’s confusing only if you ignore all indicators and only see the image I posted, but still, more confusing than your example for sure.
In spain you ARE changing laneain this scenario. Legally speaking lanes are not merging, the left lane is ending and the right lane continues. The left lane is merging into the right lane, so it’s a literal lane change. Regardless of where the dashes end that’s how it works.
In Spain you are supposed to indicate even when changing lanes in any road, for each lane you cross. So obviously what is shown is correct.
“You just asked someone mounting a canvas to draw you a picture. I know about mounting canvases, not drawing.”
Normal glasses here are 0.25 litters more or less. That’s around 4 glasses a litter.
37 glasses are 9.25 liters. Rounded down to 9 because people don’t fill their classes to the brim, idk.
Your numbers scare me.