Yeah someone trying to find attack spin conservatives can use.
Yeah someone trying to find attack spin conservatives can use.
I’m confused. Isn’t “collecting keystroke data” just an alarmist way to describe text entry?
If I implied I felt superior, I’m sorry. I meant to imply I want to help but it’s a 13-hour drive for me. I’ll do my best to deal with those I can here.
Dear Alberta, could you please deal with your racists and get your ridiculous theocracy out of office? We have to get ready for a real war.
So, from your knowledge of those APIs, this isn’t possible? I don’t need to develop a defensive protocol for it? I like to be comprehensive, especially with a potential (ideological and propaganda, if not literal) invasion from the new fascist state to my south, but if this is a low-level probability, I can put it way down my priority list.
[Citations needed] or it didn’t happen.
This is such a bullshit challenge. I often see it used to essentially bully someone into a side issue about citations. It’s a great way to avoid discussing the original issue.
I have knowledge (that I rarely share) that I am absolutely not going to cite, because I’m not jeopardising sources, or clearances, or violating my obligations to the official secrets act just to play someone’s status games.
If someone makes a claim, I am perfectly able to go find the relevant citations myself, if there are any. I am more interested in the structure and content of what they’re adding to the discussion.
I am literally so paranoid I regularly vary my keysteoke rhythms and explore polyrhytmic techniques to create variations. Not even joking.