• 2 Posts
  • 18 Comments
Joined 8 days ago
cake
Cake day: October 27th, 2026

help-circle

  • leadstark@lemmy.worldtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.ca•Psssst
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I think they exploited the psychological bias that n=all.

    They do it for elections and they do it for major news media.

    When people see these candidates they believe all the issues are represented and organized for.

    When people see news coverage they believe that all stories have made it into the news cycle.

    Even at the lower frequencies. For elections that could be independents or fringe politics. For news that could be local news stations or even social media.

    The truth is many many issues aren’t being represented and Many many more stories have not been told. If you look at what the national insurance pool does it could be said many are being suppressed.

    https://youtu.be/BYSFvq8sr7A

    That’s also true for the courts.

    We’ve decided that votes save Democracy (or it could be anything else). What I have not seen represented on the National level is why we are so addicted to votes to saving democracy (or your urgent issue) and if there are better systems.

    Have you never had an obvious issue it seemed wasn’t reaching the national level?

    Have you ever asked yourself who’s missing?

    From candidates. From news stories. From landmark legal cases.









  • Gotcha.

    I think, there are major differences between States.

    Have you ever read Thinking in Systems?

    The issue I’ve been seeing is the protections that bring together State legislature on important legal issues have largely been dismantled.

    It used to be the Circuit Courts and even the supreme Court worked to set clearer guidelines on recurring important issues. Now it seems there are many times less Supreme Court cases and the Circuit Courts wait for two Circuit courts to disagree before they bump it to the supreme Court.

    I don’t know everything, but that seems to be what’s happened.

    The feedback loops are all broken.

    Civil immunity was invented by judges. It was never law. We use ‘clearly established’ cases to counter that, but many of those a recursive and the entire system is broken.

    For a case to be clearly established there must be another clearly established case to point to. So it was never meant to work from my understanding.

    So Colorado is easily able to do as many Fourth Amendment seizures violations as they like. Until someone gets crypto “Clearly Established” we could be stuck with this.

    It would be interesting to see the situation in your State. Not that I wanna pry. Because Utah for instance is very similar, but a Utah flavor of these issues. Same Circuit Court.

    Does all this sound crazy?





  • That’s what I was thinking until I looked into it.

    It’s unclear who handles it.

    If it’s the Treasury or Department of Revenue. Or both.

    For all Coinbase accounts they only list a single account based on Sacramento. So I’m not sure how my account got linked to Colorado and yet unclaimed. Or how they claimed a Sacramento account in Colorado.

    They do this for BlockFi too. I figure if I can’t get them to find my Coinbase I can at least do the process there.

    They returned like $1 billion in unclaimed property, but I suspect they retain a lot more in the process.






  • The backstory is I was trying to get 9 cents to cover stories being erased in Colorado, Denver Metro and rural Colorado.

    I have a nice flowchart to show the issue, but ultimately rDenver, rColorado and even rEnglewoodCO are doing a lot of soft censorship. This coupled with retroactive NDA’s is making a lot of potential “Clearly Established” cases disappear.

    The root cause appears to be the City Insurance Pools. CIRSA for Colorado.

    They are outside of our transparency laws.

    They take every Civil Rights violation by their 298 members and make it attorney client privilege.

    We only have a two year window (kinda) for 1983 U.S.C cases so by charging high fees in the Cities, ignoring half of CORA requests and setting 2 year or less retention policies: they can erase the discovery that fixes long term problems and make people believe these problems don’t even exist.

    I tracked it from the vehicle registration and driver’s license tickets they kept giving out even when the offices were appointment only and they knew they weren’t meeting everyone. My car was towed for a vehicle registration I couldn’t get.

    I even tried to register a new vehicle and they threw the title at in at the Arapahoe DMV. Both cars they refused to register and I have the letters. That didn’t stop the tickets or impoundment.

    Now the sad thing is this is caused largely by CiRSA and it’s not just tows it’s everything. They also don’t won’t to pay firefighters their cancer benefits.

    So when Polis vetoed the benefits bill for firefighters and said the Cities didn’t want it, it was likely the Cities’ representatives which is CIRSA. CIRSA who fought in 2013 to deny cancer benefits to firefighter if something else may have caused cancer.

    CIRSA who takes public funds and lobbies Cities’ in Colorado. Who lobbied against the cancer benefits bill for the firefighters.