Corporate email way of saying “I already told you. Are you not listening?”

Or maybe a reminder to actually fulfill the agreed upon contract. But that would assume, he is a lying cheapskate, which is very unrealistic for a CEO…

I don’t wanna get into a fight over this, but they do regulate dilution. At least where I’m from.

It can only be called “juice” if it has got at least x% of juice in it. If it’s made from concentrate, it says so on the front.

Companies mustn’t lie about the percentage of juice content and all ingredients are listed on the back in order of content.

In the UK, there’s a sugar tax, so that’s another form of regulation.

Customers may decide whether they want to buy 25% or 100% juice, but this competition only works because of the rules I listed.

Because of food safety regulations

Well, there’s the second form participle used in the simple past (“I shook”) and the third participle used in the present perfect (“I have shaken”).

Since OP is leading with Wouldiwas and not Wouldibeen, I think “shook” is fitting.

Bad words don’t carry nearly as much weight if they’re said in a foreign language. That’s at least my experience with swearing.

That’s the wrong way of looking at an å.

It’s not just an a with decoration. It actually has different pronunciation and is typically replaced with aa if no å is available. (I’m neither Swedish nor Norwegian, so not 100% sure, but it’s what happened to Erling Haaland).

Similarly, you would replace a German ä with ae. So if my name was Bäcker, it would be wrong to spell it Backer on a ticket. Baecker would be the way.