Stamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 7 days agoI hate youlemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkI hate youlemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 7 days agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squaredon@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 days agoMy guy there desperately hoping we’ve all forgotten about the existence of the word “shaken”
minus-squarewieson@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·6 days agoWell, there’s the second form participle used in the simple past (“I shook”) and the third participle used in the present perfect (“I have shaken”). Since OP is leading with Wouldiwas and not Wouldibeen, I think “shook” is fitting.
minus-squarePiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-27 days agoI assume they were using the verb form, such as, “Shake the baby!”, and, “I already shook it!”, as opposed to the adjective form, “Oh look, a shaken baby!”
My guy there desperately hoping we’ve all forgotten about the existence of the word “shaken”
Well, there’s the second form participle used in the simple past (“I shook”) and the third participle used in the present perfect (“I have shaken”).
Since OP is leading with Wouldiwas and not Wouldibeen, I think “shook” is fitting.
I assume they were using the verb form, such as, “Shake the baby!”, and, “I already shook it!”, as opposed to the adjective form, “Oh look, a shaken baby!”