Sometimes I write intimate eschatologies or words about technology and math. Sometimes I make things by burning them with light or squeezing them through a small, hot tube. Sometimes I push water with a stick while sitting in a tiny boat.
@lovestha @Sandra @mtg Right, this is just a bit of a funny one in that there’s only one prevention effect, but multiple things it could apply to, instead of multiple effects applying to the same thing.
It makes sense a similar design philosophy holds in both cases, but without there being a separate 615.7, I’m not sure how you’d resolve the goblins + Ghyrson + Bandage example.
@Sandra @mtg Ah, got it, I’d missed that Ghyrson was also attacking, sorry, now I see the problem. Oh, wow, that is a bit hairy… even reading the CRs it seems like there’s no real resolution to what “next” means in that case?
The Gatherer rulings on Bandage are similarly useless, I wonder if there’s another prevent-next effect that might have more useful rulings?
@Sandra @mtg Naively, I would think the goblins’ damage would be prevented, such that Ghyrson doesn’t fire? The wording of Ghyrson sounds like it triggers off of a source of damage resolving, such that it couldn’t happen before or simulntaneously with the goblins’ damage.
That is, I’d see it roughly as:
• Blockers are assigned
• Bandage goes on the stack
• Bandage resolves
• Damage resolution: Goblins do 1 damage
• Ghyrson’s trigger sees the damage
@lovestha @Sandra @mtg I didn’t read it that way at all, it’s helpful context, thank you! I’m absolutely not a judge, so I appreciate learning more about!