• Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s laws for this. IIRC, as long as the person playing the movie owns it and isn’t charging anyone to watch, it’s legal.

        • Cort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think they’re drawing a distinction between personal use and commercial exhibition.

          If you own a legal copy you can use it for personal uses like a projector on a wall. But you couldn’t charge admission fees to your little movie theater. iirc there’s some weird laws for commercial venues based on the square footage, where restaurants and bars under like 500sqft. have more leeway in what music/tv/movies they can play without obtaining a commercial license for the media

          • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I guess the MPAA isn’t as ruthless as the music one (forgot their acronym). I recently found out you can’t even perform karaoke over the internet legally, even if you’re not charging admission, unless you get a license for the songs you’re performing. Same with doing covers unless it’s live.

            That’s some straight bullshit, imo.

  • Chocrates@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Lol will the greedy AI companies be the ones that fix the broken copyright system in America?

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, the broken legal system will give them a pass and pat on the back.

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    that legal argument doesn’t fly in the u.s…

    but if you wanna buy a ruling that says downloading isn’t piracy, go for it.

    • Arcka@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      What’s the precedent and current consensus for caselaw? I remember that Capitol v. Thomas kicked off the notion of “making available” as an infringement of the distribution right, but I haven’t followed everything that came after.