Without any flashy marketing campaigns or social media fanfare, Valve rolled out a routine Steam Client update containing a very simple line in the patch notes: “Improved Steam Client startup performance.”

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Steam is great at being fetter free and no bells and whistles service. They just do what the customers want rather than being pro-greedy milkers who push customers to accept what they don’t want.

    • Sustolic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      At least on arch and on my hardware it is the difference of ~2s and ~8s, launching 4x as fast is substantial.

      Still not using it over heroic tho.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Even if Steam was slower, it’s a better platform. When I go to a game’s store page on Steam I learn literally everything about it. Literally everything I need to know. Because there’s user reviews. Because there’s a link to the forums.

    EGS doesn’t have user input. They don’t even include as many vids/screenshots. It’s all very low effort and I have to go elsewhere to figure things out about the product.

  • Almacca@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Launch times don’t matter to me. I never shut Steam down, and I almost never open EGS. What an odd metric to boast about, anyway. Launch time is the least of EGS’ problems.

    • Derpgon@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      In what world does that matter? Do you start Steam 50 times a day? Website, sure, you open thousands a day, but Steam? You open it once maximum twice a day.

  • AngryRedHerring@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    As Steam has been extremely slow to launch for quite some time now, anybody want to take a stab at why it took an Epic Games taunt for them to take care of it?

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      You think they only waited for epic to drop an update as if they monitor them from the inside?

      That’s a next level conspiracy theory lol

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Could be you have it set to start up when you boot your computer, as it’s pretty quick to “launch” when it’s actually already running but hidden in the system tray. I have it set to be manually launched on mine and yeah 10 seconds sounds about right for what I’m used to (haven’t restarted since the update).

      • AngryRedHerring@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ah. So there you go. And it will go down in history written in stone and people will still be talking about it 100 years from now

    • codydodd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      In my opinion, respectfully disagreed. So many professional engineers i work with or hire now forget how to code. We now allow LLMs but you must read every single line and be able to audit and explain your stack as if you read every line. And we don’t allow them for anything larger than simple functions. They are attrociously inefficient. Yet so many execs and devs think they are super intelligent. Hence why we need to call out vibe coding.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    My “Hello, World!” script boots approximately 18000x faster than the Epic launcher.

    The difference in features between the two is about the same as it is between Steam and the Epic launcher.

    • adhdsergio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Technically correct, practically wrong, they are both gaming store bloat apps but steam is a steaming (!) pile of a webshite that takes longer to load than some games (for me at least) and uses 700mb of ram/vram.

      • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Technically correct, practically wrong

        This is exactly the point made with the ridiculous Hello World-example. It’s a parody of the original post. Epic is technically correct, but practically wrong.

  • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Who the fuck cares if the fast launcher is a piece of crap with a fraction of features needed for a good library and storefront?