BREAKING - Tiktok has now SHUT DOWN SERVICES in the United States, noting “A law banning Tiktok has been enacted in the U.S. Unfortunately, that means you can’t use TikTok for now. We are fortunate that President Trump has indicated that he will work with us on a solution to reinstate Tiktok once he takes office. Please stay tuned!”

@technology@beehaw.org @news@beehaw.org @usnews@beehaw.org @programming@beehaw.org @technology@lemmy.world @news@lemmy.world #technology @worldnews@lemmy.ml @technology@lemmy.ml

  • friendbot@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    I just don’t see how this move and the timing was not orchestrated to manipulate uninformed TikTok users into supporting Trump. The explicit callout to Trump in the message… I have been fearing the next presidency and this was a blow.

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      On one hand, yeah, on the other hand Biden literally signed the law banning it. If Democrats didn’t want Tik Tok being banned to be associated with them and to give Republicans an easy, obvious win by unbanning a wildly popular app, then they could have just… not done that. This was just completely an unforced error on the part of the Democrats.

      • OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Or instead of targeting tiktok specifically, they could have chosen to pass a data privacy law and actually did something worthwhile instead of pointless, unpopular grandstanding. Haha just kidding, they would never do anything to reduce even slightly shareholder value.

          • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            As long as it’s completely legal for American companies to sell the data that’s allegedly so sensitive to anyone they please, the law does nothing except allow the president to target apps selectively. If it’s the propagandizing via the algorithm that’s such a huge concern, that’s still completely legal too.

            Democrats shutting down TikTok over a do nothing bill is probably the stupidest shit they could have done with Biden’s last year in office.

        • themurphy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          It’s never been about data privacy. Never.

          It’s always been about control. Always?

          Snape: “Always.”

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Accurate perspective but another one is this was a very successful social engineering of US politics by its global adversaries.

        Dems have been been trying to pull back the moment they released they got played but its to late. Above messaging is additional salt in the wound.

        • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          How did they “[get] played”? Like the poster you replied too said, it was a completely unforced error on their part. It feels like they tried to jump on the right-wing “China bad” bandwagon and it bit them in the arse.

          • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            19 days ago

            Its pure speculation but i suspect china may have purposely pushed for the tiktok is spyware narrative and fueled the china bad bandwagon themselves.

            They made it a real privacy nightmare but also by made sure western leaders know it is a privacy nightmare.

            Something i noted is that European parlement and many individual European govs have in recent years put up laws banning tiktok for gov officials and all staff but not the general public/citizens.

            • spit_evil_olive_tips@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              19 days ago

              Its pure speculation but

              you know you can just…stop typing after that, right?

              i suspect china may have purposely pushed for the tiktok is spyware narrative and fueled the china bad bandwagon themselves.

              you’re making the same racist assumption that underlies the TikTok ban itself - that Chinese people are inherently nefarious, untrustworthy, always hatching schemes and plots and subterfuge.

              the US does not need to be “tricked” into passing laws that are rooted in anti-Chinese bigotry. it’s basically a national pastime.

              • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                19 days ago

                Lol, This implies that Chinese citizens somehow have a say in what their government elite desires. I don’t think they are much different then anyone else.

                If it makes you feel better the US puts just as much energy into manipulating other countries as other countries do into them. And may i remind you of the chat control Europe routinely tries to sneak in a ban encryption for all its citizens without them noticing. my original comment addressed “global adversaries”, i only mentioned china replying to a comment specify about china. So not racist, I am anti any centralized power structure because power always corrupts.

                The fact is that governments have always (amongst other things) been rooted in a centralized resource and population control. The big problem as i would call it is that the emergent complexity of global politics makes the dynamics so complex not a single person, not even a president is capable of knowing more then the micro-environment they exist within. This is precisely why states feel a need to create extensive bureaucracies and specialized agencies which historically have a tendency to evolve into centralized powered structures themselves and power always corrupts.

                No nations, No borders, No gods, No masters