• group_hug@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Aren’t these all launched into orbit by space X?

    Great idea, but I don’t see it going anywhere when their competitor can throttle their growth.

  • antianarchist@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Keep on dreaming and wait for another 5-8y until this is actually comparable in terms of bandwidth and latency to Starlink in certain regions. You need a fuckton of satellites up there. Building is one thing. Having a payload slot on a carrier is the way more difficult part and one reason starlink was built so quickly. Their launch capacity is just insane. And if you don’t have your own space crafts, you just wait for a slot.

    • klankin@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Didn’t read the article but they could be doing elliptical orbits.

      Much more stable orbit (so longer lasting), but way less useful for equatorial countries.

  • Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Ottawa-based Telesat says its low-Earth-orbit broadband satellite network will enter service in early 2028 and be available to allied nations, including Ukraine.”

    Fuck ya! Go Canada!

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    Telesat Lightspeed main focus is enterprise and defense clients though, they don’t plan to expand into direct consumer service which would require a larger deployment.

    Still nice to have an alternative to Starlink for that purpose though.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Getting Canadian governments services off Musk’s platform (and out of his income stream) is a win by itself.

    • BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s LEO so they’ll burn up after not too long. But that’s not good either- because all those toxic chemicals and components are left in the atmosphere.

      • klankin@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        If fiber companies used 1% of the money we throw at them to actually build fiber, sattelite internet would never need to exist.

        Its the most centralised, short term, low speed, expansive option possible and we are choosing it.

        • BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Fibre doesn’t work in airplanes or remote areas. Ukraine can’t use fibre in its very long range drones (they do for the short range ones).

          There different use cases. That said, I still agree with you, we should have more fibre.

          • klankin@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I agree-ish, wartime is something else, but if we have fiber up in Hudson bay we really don’t need-need starlink anywhere in 2026 (other than where we’ve dragged our feet getting fiber).

            airplanes could use an elliptical sattelite for their high speed, low latency requirments. Personally though any connection more than a high orbit satellite provides is a nice to have, but not safety critical by any means.

            Plus LEO is just intentionally wasteful, I wouldn’t be surprised if starlibk was a money hole without its military contracts.