Summary

Democratic divisions intensified as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Nancy Pelosi sharply criticized Chuck Schumer for supporting a Republican-led funding bill to avoid a government shutdown.

AOC called Schumer’s decision a “betrayal,” urging Senate Democrats to reject the legislation backed by Trump and Elon Musk. Pelosi called the bill a “devastating assault” on working families.

Schumer defended his stance, arguing a shutdown would empower Trump and Musk further.

The controversy sparked suggestions among Democrats that AOC might challenge Schumer in a primary.

  • Sovereign@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Wasn’t this a CR for the dem’s own spending bill…? So its the same bill the dems had right?

    • burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      the bill has funds for departments and agencies that dont exist anymore and it would give the administration a giant pile of free money with no strings attached

    • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      no but you don’t understand! IF YOU HAD JUST VOTED, WE COULD HAVE HAD TEN CHUCK SCHUMERS TO VOTE FOR THE FASCIST CRAP! so really everything bad that happened is your fault for not voting. how dare you fail the democratic party like this.

  • BostonSamurai@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Dems need to stop pretending Schumer is the only problem, any other dem in his position would have done the same thing including AOC. The party is rotten to the core it’s just a revolving door of sycophants who server wall st and capital. The party is working as intended. Notice how Dems never have power to make actual change, never have the backbone to oppose republicans, and when they have majorities they never use their power for actual progress or at the very least codifying laws like roe v wade ect. They are there to act like an opposition party not actually be one. The working class is perpetually screwed.

    • Triple Iris@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I will never again take AOC or any other “squad” member seriously as long as they proudly call themselves Democrats. Go independent like Bernie or start another party. Until then, if they want to keep giving themselves the same label as Schumer or Fetterman, I’m going to lump them in the same batch of assholes and idiots.

        • Z3k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          Its funny I have suddenly seen the leave the party thing pop up in multiple places at the exact same time.

          Beginning to think it’s AstroTurf to get the noise people out of the way and into 3rd party oblivion

  • WorkshopBubby@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    I have been extremely pro-democrat and it has driven me insane how the far left ONLY ever shits on democrats when they are objectively better than republicans on every single issue. Democrats generally vote in the direction of increased taxes on the rich, more access to healthcare, better safety nets, etc. while republicans are just demons who obstruct all progress for the sake of destroying the world. But after Trumps election, watching the cowardice of the dems actually fucking disgusts me. They might as well be republicans with their lack of response. Just a fucking disgrace. Fuck Cuck Schumer. I will stop defending dems. Trumps election is the official end of both parties. Neither of those parties can be allowed to survive if the US manages to survive this.

    • Saint_La_Croix_Crosse@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Democrats aren’t generally pro taxing the rich or deviating significantly on many issues since Clinton and the 90s. Yes, some of the squad said that they were pro-taxing the rich when they knew that there was no possibility of it being brought to a vote and the Democrats maintained a pretend opposition to the extreme violations of civil rights in the war on terror or ICE deportations. But after Obama, the most extreme and worst excesses of the war on terror were bipartisan, and after Biden all ICE and immigration policies were fully bipartisan (he continued the obviously facetious use of COVID as a terrible, contagious disease to deny asylum seekers, just as Trump did, after saying COVID was over, and continued deportations and putting immigrants in ICE concentration camps, when 4 years prior Democrats could understand that was fascist). That is why the left hates Democrats. Because the two-party system means the Democrats can absorb all opposition to the Republicans, while continuing all of their policies and claiming that wanting any movement to the left/away from fascism is only helping the Republicans. That we should just continue the Republican’s policies, but it is fine because Obama is going to file the paperwork correctly to send Arabs to blacksites or Biden is going to file the paperwork correctly to do ICE deportations at a greater rate than Trump [term 1] or genocide in Gaza. The Democrats are above criticism and should be allowed to do fascist immigration policy or genocide.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    About half the seated Democrats right now need to be primaried hard. How did we have a more coordinated opposition party during Trump’s first term? It’s worse this time around and they are showing absolutely no will to fight.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      what are you supposed to do? The congress controls the budget, literally as defined by the constitution, the executive is currently trying to pretend that isn’t the law. And the supreme court doesn’t exactly seem content about doing anything over it, so it’s not like you can do much as the congress. You literally can’t win here, we have to wait for all the lawsuits to hit for anything to begin happening.

      • obvs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Hmm, yes, it’s almost as if we have a government that isn’t functioning and there seem to be no options that are legal under the current government…

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        what are you supposed to do?

        Schumer went from “we have to be a united front” to “I’m gonna vote for what republicans want!” He pretended to hold the former position for less than a day.

        So uh, not that.

  • Plurrbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    As she should, and Every. Single. Member! Do better “America” or should I say “The illegal 1% trash”.

    “Public servants cannot and will not use their public status to increase their own personal wealth”

    SAID NO GOVERNMENT MEMBER EVER! They are not “for the people” they have more money than most will see and clearly they only care about themselves! Fuck ALL OF THE GOVERNMENT MEMBERS and actually clean the fucking swamp from greed and idiocracy! We deserve better!

    • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      She would have to be in the senate to take over senate leadership in the short term. For his seat itself, there’s been house members - including moderates - starting to support the idea her primarying him when his term is up in 2028

      Several members — including moderates — have begun voicing support for a primary challenge to Schumer, floating Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) as possible candidates, three House Democrats said.

      https://www.axios.com/2025/03/14/house-democrats-angry-chuck-schumer-shutdown

    • PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Spinelessness is the chief defining quality of the entire Democratic Party. There are very few individual exceptions and those people need to start a new party. The US needs a real progressive party. The establishment Dems have made it very clear they won’t support a true progressive candidate, so what’s the point of bending the knee to these fuckers any longer?

      • formulaBonk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        And honestly now is the time to do it. I have absolutely zero faith we will have honest elections in the next couple decades so splitting the funding between neo lib corpocrats and an actual progressive party for the people will not affect the crooked elections under trump since they won’t win anyway. The time for progress is NOW

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Its hard to decide if they are spineless or complicit. Not that it amounts to much of a difference in the end.

    • Dimmer@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      This idea had some merit two years ago but it’s too late. And trump proved that you can take over a party if your tribe is popular enough.

    • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      What a colossally terrible idea that is completely detached from where the average American is politically these days.

      • hansolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        As someone that never trusted either party, this is the one way to get my vote.

        The Dems are 80% dusty skeletons desperate to simply stay in office. They don’t do a single thing in the interest of the people, otherwise this whole thing wouldn’t be an issue. F them and F the GOP twice as hard. They are very much also a part of how we all ended up here.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Most Americans are so deeply fed up with both parties, that they just tune the fuck out. Republicans are evil and Democrats are feckless. Americans have been starved for any kind of meaningful change since the year 2000. The whiplash politics we currently all are living through is a direct consequence of that.

          Americans wanted significant change from the status quo, so they went away from Clintonism to Bush. Then they wanted significant change (hope and change, remember that?) so they went Obama. Then they wanted significant change so they went Trump. Then again, wanted significant change, and they went Biden. And yet again, whiplash, and we get Trump.

          Americans are desperate for change and have no way to express that through the currently available options.

        • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          You’re asking to turn apathetic voters into 3rd party voters. I don’t think you realize what that means.

          • hansolo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            Oh no, I’m asking apathetic voters to be so apathetic that brands no longer matter either.

              • hansolo@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 days ago

                I would go into the game theory and political theory of this, but I fear you wouldn’t understand that either.

                It’s OK, if it happens, things would be so beyond fucked to get us to that point that it’s less of a “third party” and more of a “survivors” scenario.

        • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          I mean yes I would love to see it but what I’m also saying is that yes, the public is not going to support it

          • Allonzee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            You’re right about the public, but that also means there is no hope and no one should care or try.

            If the people will only vote neoliberal or fascist, theres nothing to be done other than store food and water and hope you aren’t noticed until complete societal collapse. There is no possible path to a decent society when both choices are fine with the poor dying to enrich their bribers.

            I think after 24 years of holding my nose and voting Neoliberal, telling myself the lesser evil will somehow lead to salvation, and fighting for Sanders on 2 campaigns, I’m done participating. Harris was my last gasp of appealing to this cesspool’s nonexistent sense of decency. I’m not going to endorse or signify the Neoliberals new meet in the middle low next cycle, where they call for “more humane” concentration camps as compromise. My hands are dirty enough voting for the good cop in this corpo fascist good cop/bad cop routine all this time.

            George Carlin called it, the people suck so things really can’t get better. We’re a garbage people that largely despise the idea of an equitable society. Better collapse than perpetuating that. Not like people who only vote for which tribe to hurt deserve more.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        This is TDD we’re talking about. One of the louder more prominent blue maga screechers. Who still hasn’t realized or just doesn’t care that they were made a fool of and used. That has massive dreams and whose failures are even larger than those dreams. Blasting themselves in the foot all the way down.

        TDD is third party ride or die. They know that that is where it’s at. They’re only 7% away from breaking 10% in national elections that’s so close! Only another 40 to 50% for them to win an election. That’s practically nothing! Why would anyone want to reclaim the Democratic party. Use it’s brand recognition and reputation with the average person build strength and coalition. It’s got cooties! /S

        That’s the level of logic you’ll get in any responses from them.

        • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          I mostly make my point to the benefit of onlookers (hopefully benefit lol) so I appreciate the context! Didn’t realize this dude had a reputation .

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        What a colossally terrible idea that is completely detached from where the average American is politically these days.

        Or… hear me out… It was a colossally terrible idea to not do this after the ratfucking of 2016. Or the ratfucking 0f 2020. Or the ratfucking of 2024. It was a colossally terrible idea to leave the clearly incapable managers of the Democratic party in place, and in lieu of replacing them, which doesn’t appear possible, to identify and adopt strategies that go around them.

        We’ve done orders of magnitude more damage to ourselves by continuing to support Democrats when Democrats do not support us, in anything other than meaningless performative bullshit.

        Getting off heroine is hard. Alcoholism detox can kill you. But not dealing with either of those things isn’t a solution to the problem.

        The Democrats are not your freinds. They aren’t even your allies. They are a tool preventing you from having access to power and to prevent us collectively from making the kinds of changes that can kill fascist movements in the crib by not allowing the legitimate conditions that permit grievance politics to persist.

        By occupying the space where real change, where an authentic attempt to better the lives of people would be, Democrats are a tool to prevent the addressing of the fundamental problems we have in society. Leaving these issues unaddressed give fascists legitimate grievances to co-opt into these kinds of racist and fascist movements.

        • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Trump would’ve won 2020. You do realize that right?

          Vote in primaries. Kick out the pelosis and schumers. Give the reins to the AOC’s. If that’s not possible it only proves there is no political appetite among Americans for progressive politics, which is our loss.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            Okay so just keep doing the things that haven’t worked in the past?

            I just want to be clear what your argument is. You want the strategy to be the same thing that people have been trying to do for 25 years?

              • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 days ago

                Republicans voted out their corporate overlords for fascists and racists.

                Democrats failed to do so. Now the Democrats can’t win an election to save their life.

                🤔

                • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 days ago

                  can’t win an election to save their life

                  3 of the last 5 presidential terms had a Democrat in office. 3 of the last 5 presidents were democrats period. They just barely lost their first popular vote since 2004. They won the 3 before that as well.

                  Democrats have taken control of either or both chambers on a consistent basis. They have not had some notable run of losses. In fact it’s the GOP that is struggling to keep its majorities even in favorable electoral conditions.

                  The majority of the country is represented or otherwise governed by democrats and have been for…20 years now I believe?

                  So what exactly are you talking about?

        • CitricBase@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          You’re not arguing against Democrats, you are arguing against basic math. Here is a primer for why going third party is a complete non-starter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7tWHJfhiyo

          The way forward is to transform the Democratic party from the inside out. It’s not impossible, Trump did it to the entire Republican party in the span of less than a decade. Vote in PRIMARY elections.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            To be clear, you are repeating the same argument that has been being repeated, for effectively 25 years. This is exactly the same argument being made in the year 2000 when the Democrats rolled over on Bush V Gore.

            If you want any one to take this argument seriously at this point, you need to tell me how the last 25 years of evidence showing that this approach to politics doesn’t work, will work this time. Because to be clear, your exact strategy is the theory of change thats been in application. And the result was the rise of fascism globally.

            Give me a reason to take this argument, thats been repeated and repeated, again and again, seriously, when the data we have shows that pushing for change from within the DNC isn’t working.

            Your strategy is quite literally the only strategy thats been attempted, and what we got for it was the rise of fascism. So whats different this time? Why should we take you seriously?

          • Rhaedas@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            Good video on the problem with system we’re stuck with (the only ones who can change it are the ones who benefit from it). Another interesting related video is this one about the history of parties and once again you see that while sometimes extra party movements pop up, they always get absorbed into one of the two big ones.

            It’s math. Until we change how we elect, it will always be this way. And just like you mention changing the Democratic party from within, so do we have to change how we vote from the lower to the higher. Some states have started better systems, and the more than do, the more likely it can be worked into the federal level.

            • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              Until we change how we elect

              I mean, you don’t legitimately think that we can do that in the current system do you?

              Like, try and see the contradiction in your thinking.

              • Rhaedas@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 days ago

                It’s not contradiction, you’re talking about something different. I’m talking about First Past The Post elections vs. other systems that allow more than two parties to be competitive.

            • CitricBase@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              Yes, I agree, any kind of ranked choice voting system would help to end the two-party duopoly. If you are lucky enough to have your state consider a ballot measure to introduce such a system, do everything in your power to help it pass.

              Unfortunately, it will not be easy; for obvious reasons, there are many powerful political forces opposing such reform. Here is a page showing how well such measures have done in recent elections: https://ballotpedia.org/History_of_ranked-choice_voting_(RCV)_ballot_measures

              By the way, if you liked the CGP Grey Animal Kingdom video, it continues as a short series: https://www.cgpgrey.com/politics-in-the-animal-kingdom/

  • MithranArkanere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Apparently it’s only “compromise” when it aligns with corporate interests. When it’s about the benefit of the people, it somehow becomes “extremism”.