• ugtug@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Satellite internet is simply never going to best the throughput and stability of fiber. Just another corrupt action so this administration can line their pockets.

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    There is absolutely no reason the US government shouldn’t be launching their own public satellite internet.

    Look at North Korea. People get killed for smuggling in flash drives with western media into the country. We could be streaming it from uninterruptible satellites. We could be fighting the global information war on a level most other countries could only dream of.

    On the domestic end, if we get Internet access to every corner of the country, it opens up remote work to every American. That could bring an incredible economic boost to impoverished rural areas.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Trump shut down Radio Free Asia. And Radio Free Europe, and Voice of America. I don’t think he cares about getting the message out there.

      And as far as a public Internet? Have you met the US? We can’t deliver electricity or water without someone making a profit on each unit of energy or water delivered. It’s unamerican. Why would satellite Internet be any different?

    • F_OFF_Reddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah amigo, I get that’d be amazing but you think the government would want highly educated populace here and everywhere? and with free access to all kinds of information?

      Yeah right…

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Starlink makes sense on the top of mountain. If you have electricity from the grid, you should get fiber.

      • Fondots@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I think that’s kind of the point they’re making

        There’s no good reason why they can’t run fiber to your home if you already have power lines and such going to your house. The utility poles, roads, and all the other infrastructure is there already, they mostly just need to send some guys in cherry pickers out to actually go run the fiber and hook it up to your home, and odds are they even already have guys out in the area servicing the old phone and/or cable lines that are probably also running to your house. They just don’t want to spend the money (that the government gave them years ago to do specifically that)

        The only good reason not to have at least the option of running fiber to your house is if you’re otherwise off the grid.

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Everyone who has power by grid has all the hard infrastructure in-place for fiber to their home. The only thing blocking it is corporate-political corruption

        • Legume5534@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Everyone who has power by grid has all the hard infrastructure in-place for fiber to their home.

          That’s absolutely false.

  • whaleiam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Can starling even come close to the speed of fiber? I’m getting a gibabit a second for 50 bucks a month

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      It’s not meant for that and won’t really ever compete well against it if fiber can be run there cost effectively, although there are odd situations even in cities where it’s useful.

      Like maybe there’s a warehouse in some part of a big city that somehow wasn’t connected and the utilities wants 50k to connect it.

      Realistically we can’t run fiber everywhere, but there’s many millions of more homes out there that could be but aren’t, and the telcos keep taking money to do the upgrades and do jack all.

    • Legume5534@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’ve seen about 250mbps down on a friend’s terminal. You can probably get faster.

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Nowhere close. Wireless anything needs to share a band across multiple devices. With fiber, you can either have an exclusive run to the service provider or, at the very least, to a connection point shared with some neighbors.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Regardless of the obvious moneygrab corruption, It’s not like the fiber program was ever going to work in the first place as long as private ISP’s were involved.

    Fiber backbone got installed along 25 miles of rural county highway out in the valley my parents live in. The company paid to do it marks the area as “service coming soon”.
    That was in 2018. The fiber is still dark with all the distribution boxes empty and not hooked up to anything, the only other options being $110/mo DSL in a very few select spots, a local mountaintop microwave wireless service that is basically turned off from November until April, or Starlink… and I’m guessing it’ll forever remain that way until the coming collapse of the USA.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    As someone that lives in the rural US and has no option for internet besides Starlink, I’d much rather have fiber. Starlink isn’t bad, but it’s garbage compared to fiber.

    Plus I don’t want to give Elmo my money. I really wish I had other options.

    • blakenong@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 hours ago

      You’re lucky you get any channels besides Fox News. Keep complaining and you’ll go back to dialup ;) ;) ;)

          • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Not even that really, you just don’t get outside communication. That type of area is getting rarer (especially after satellite TV and internet) but in some places, like for example some parts of backwoods Louisiana where I grew up, you were really just cut off. You were lucky to have a phone line. We would drive most of an hour to town to get a bunch of blockbuster tapes to keep us entertained during the week.

            Some of those places have been a bit modernized, but in a lot of areas like that across the southern and midwest USA I would not be at all surprised to hear that satellite TV and internet are still the only options available.

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Fun fact: dialup is much better than cable in many countries.

        Edit: oh no thats cat3 on DSL. Not dialup

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I think the bigger headline should be the huge conflict of interest between Musk being a megadonor and “advisor” / leader of DOGE (depending on if you ask Trump or his minions) and being the CEO of Starlink owner SpaceX.

    Add it to the list including lease of Starlink services and kits to the FAA.

  • WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It sucks to even be in partial agreement with the broligarchs, but as a rural American, I have zero sympathy for this fuckhead or anyone else involved in the broadband fund.

    The government has been pouring money into broadband expansion for decades, and for decades, internet providers have been sopping up that money while doing exactly nothing to actually earn it.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      They’ve been doing the exact same thing in Canada.

      Give us money to expand! Billions later, or we got 5 new houses connected and spent the rest upgrading other shit not for rural people.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s not all a story of failure, because there are numerous rural areas that have fiber now that did not before those programs. Some states have added on programs that boost the fiber adoption, like letting local phone and power companies roll out fiber on utility poles along the power lines. For example, I’m in a rural area and have 2 good options for fiber for about $50/mo with higher tier plans available.

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I mean, we could tell them to pay back the money, or force them to make upgrades. But, its easier to just award contracts to starlink.

      • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 hours ago

        We certainly can’t make them pay the money back. That could affect executive bonuses and stock plans as well corporate stock buybacks to drive up stock prices! Won’t you think of the executives! /s