This information is out of date by 7 years, DSA is antizionist. Most Zionists were in the North Star caucus and left after the 2019 resolution to align with BDS, but there is more history in the link above. Any claims that DSA is Zionist today is a smear campaign.
How are they acheiving this; what material evidence do you have of this? They are considered a threat by both Dems and GOP, wouldn’t a spoiler party be allowed to operate in the space like the Green party has in the past (which is a known spoiler party)? If that’s the case why the opposition to them?
This information is out of date by 7 years, DSA is antizionist. Most Zionists were in the North Star caucus and left after the 2019 resolution to align with BDS, but there is more history in the link above. Any claims that DSA is Zionist today is a smear campaign.
DSA remains loyal to Harrington’s Democratic Party entryism strategy.
No, it isn’t, National DSA has no official position on entryism, and is not the claim in this post. You can learn about the multiple tendencies here
Decentralized org? Lmao.
What are you trying to say here?
That they are disingenuous, at best.
Are you saying that they are disingenuous about being decentralized? You seem to be operating with incorrect information if that is that case.
No, I’m saying they’re a spoiler party meant to keep parties acceptable to power structures in place.
How are they acheiving this; what material evidence do you have of this? They are considered a threat by both Dems and GOP, wouldn’t a spoiler party be allowed to operate in the space like the Green party has in the past (which is a known spoiler party)? If that’s the case why the opposition to them?
National’s platform is so different from its chapters?