• TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    Okay, let’s just be clear here: Signal isn’t just another “private app”; the amount of information they have about your communications is zero (0) with the exception that I believe they can see if you have an account and the last time you connected to the server. Governments absolutely do rely on Signal. This fuck-up was strictly due to the fact that they’re incompetent morons just randomly inviting people to group chats and shit with no guardrails. If I had to guess, they’d probably want to fork the Signal app and make it so that you can only invite people with some form of clearance, but this last thing is total speculation on my part. I’m sure there’s some way to sanely do this. The part about Signal being secure is just objectively true; it’s audited like absolute crazy, both the FOSS app and the protocol. I would trust it more than whatever the US government could homebrew, even.

    • fake_meows@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      This fuck-up was strictly due to the fact that they’re incompetent morons just randomly inviting people to group chats and shit with no guardrails.

      No.

      These fuckwits were handling classified and top secret information in the open on their cell phones.

      It doesn’t matter what specific app they used. This is not about the technology. You missed the point.

    • darkdemize@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Let’s also be clear: Signal, regardless of their encryption standards, is not an approved system for any kind of classified information. Leaks of this nature have the potential to cost people’s lives. Every single person in that group chat would have known this. Many of them have original classification authority.

      Further, not only was the platform not approved for the information, the messages were set to disappear after some time. This is a violation of government record keeping laws and FOIA standards. This wasn’t an oopsie.

      • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        I mean we put a fox news anchor in charge, and if he’s even half as dumb as he looks, well that’s pretty fucking dumb. I doubt he understands, or if he does, doesn’t care. Just shameful. But hey, at least the libs are getting owned.

      • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        The mere fact it was possible to invite a random journalist to the chat is ridiculous. That shouldn’t be an option in a secure environment.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      There’s been a few articles recently about Session authors starting with Signal protocol, and then continuing without clear understanding what they do, thus that Session shouldn’t be used.

      Matrix is a compromise, it’s not as much about security as it is about just modern FOSS chat.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        Matrix is a compromise, it’s not as much about security as it is about just modern FOSS chat.

        Pray tell. Granted again that Element doesn’t yet support forward secrecy, but describe what you see as specifically wrong with Matrix, please.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          but describe what you see as specifically wrong with Matrix, please.

          Federated with huge load on servers. I’d prefer something like old Skype with auth servers part interacting via activitypub or something like that.

          • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            Do you see anything wrong with it security-wise? The wording of your previous comment has me confused where you fall on this.