• Draces@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I did not misunderstand your bot theory but good to see you prove my “even if I agree” point lmao

    • fishos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      You ended your comment saying you completely disagree with me after reiterating what I’d just said as if it were your own thought.

      You really need to work on your communication and reading comprehension buddy.

      • Draces@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you think it’s bots then that seems like a more legitimate complaint

        An easy way to win popularity contests is to stuff the ballot. On the internet, you can do this with bots

        You really need to work on your communication and reading comprehension buddy.

        Maybe try a mirror bud

        • fishos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Try reading the whole thing and comprehending it as a complex thought with nuance. I’ll wait. Might take you awhile but I’ll wait.

          • Draces@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            On boy are you dense. I agreed if your theory that bots are to blame is correct you have a legitimate complaint I dispute that and you got really confused and angry saying I don’t understand instead of anything of substance. Do you know what projection is?

            • fishos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              I never said bots were the problem. I said people caring more about popularity is the problem and that once you realize this it’s super easy to program bots to imitate people by up voting/down voting what you want. But yes, call me dense when you’ve misconstrued my argument from day one.

              Edit: didn’t look like my previous comment posted so I rewrote it. Considering how dense you are tho, maybe two versions will help you finally understand, so I’ll just leave it.

              • Draces@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                I never said bots were the problem

                it’s super easy to program bots to imitate people

                Considering how dense you are tho

                Hmm…

            • fishos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Because I never said bots are to blame. People are and once you realize that, programming a bot to do what people can do is super easy.

              I get offended when people try to tell me I made an argument I never made. But thanks again buddy 👍