• HatchetHaro@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    i mean, “habit” is a weird word for it. i’d call it more of a trend. “brain rot” seems like an adequate description.

    it comes from streamer culture where streamers would refer to their audience as “chat” because the chat box is the main way for viewers to interact with whoever they are watching.

    • bzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      I guess memes are brain rot. This feels like a get off my lawn comment.

      Just because it’s a relatively new meme/saying that derives from streamer culture, doesn’t make it brain rot.

      • Chocobofangirl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        It’s also the most unbiased word for referring to a group in a gender neutral way I’ve seen lol most others have implications of status (gentlepersons, folks), are still technically gendered (guys, not to mention this implies relatively young people too), or overbroad (everybody is well, everybody. Chat implies you’re addressing your community or a small group since they’re the ones who would be talking to you).

        • MHLoppy@fedia.ioOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          Wait “folks” has a status implication? IS NO WORD SIMPLY UNPROBLEMATIC!? IS NOTHING SACRED FROM THIS LINGUISTIC HELL

          • HatchetHaro@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            the way i see it, “folks” can refer to a more traditional group of people, most likely rural, and you wouldn’t call nobles or people of other high status “folks”.

            but also i doubt people think it is problematic; it’s just a quirk of the English language that “chat” emerged basically out of nowhere with the closest analogue being “audience”.

            • WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              the way i see it, “folks” can refer to a more traditional group of people, most likely rural, and you wouldn’t call nobles or people of other high status “folks”.

              But you’d call nobles or high status people “chat”?