• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    You can take this a step further and ask why we have this aggregation of wealth at all. Private wealth consolidation is a form of malinvestment resulting from a handful of individuals who are told they can effectively loot the economy unchecked.

    Taxation “solves” the problem by clawing back some of that malinvestment. But if you recognize it as malinvestment from the outset, you can see arguments against having these private aggregators of wealth at all.

    Instead of taxes, why not simply impose a maximum income? In baseball, you’d call it a salary cap.

    • MoonlightFox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Of course, but we are as a society so far away from that. It requires a bigger cultural shift than we are anywhere near. Even the thought of an inheritance tax is very unpopular.

      Yes, even as a very social democratic country with a highly educated populace, we can be pretty stupid about taxes.

      Also most really rich people have their wealth in assets and make their money as gains on those assets. So it does not really tax the most important people, except maybe some C-suites.