Now, you’re going to pretend that anything but immediate concession is moving the goalposts.
I’ll remind you that it was never in contest that trump disputed the election results. Just your bullshit assertion that his disputes delayed the results of the 2020 elections.
Let’s start with recounts, then move on to lawsuits.
There were two states that had recounts in 2020, Georgia and Wisconsin.
Georgia’s recount concluded on November 19. The election was called 12 days prior, on November 7. It did not delay the election results.
Wisconsin’s recount concluded on November 29. It also did not delay the election results.
Every single lawsuit listed by the source you provided:
Donald J. Trump for President Inc. v. Hobbs was filed on November 7, the same day the election was called for Biden. It clearly did not succeed in delaying the results. Here’s a source for that. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=366
Stokke v. Cegavske, Finally one that was filed before the election was called. This one was filed on November 5. There is nothing in the document you linked nor in this link: https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=352 that indicates in any way that any injunction of any sort was put in place to delay or cease any count. It did not delay the results.
https://web.mit.edu/healthyelections/www/final-reports/recounts-election-contests.html
Now, you’re going to pretend that anything but immediate concession is moving the goalposts.
I’ll remind you that it was never in contest that trump disputed the election results. Just your bullshit assertion that his disputes delayed the results of the 2020 elections.
Let’s start with recounts, then move on to lawsuits.
There were two states that had recounts in 2020, Georgia and Wisconsin.
Georgia’s recount concluded on November 19. The election was called 12 days prior, on November 7. It did not delay the election results.
Wisconsin’s recount concluded on November 29. It also did not delay the election results.
Every single lawsuit listed by the source you provided:
Donald J. Trump for President Inc. v. Hobbs was filed on November 7, the same day the election was called for Biden. It clearly did not succeed in delaying the results. Here’s a source for that. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=366
Arizona Republican Party v. Fontes was filed on November 12, 5 days after the election had been called. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=376
Ward v. Jackson was November 30. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=408
Stevenson v. Ducey was December 4. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=416
Burk v. Ducey, December 7. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=422
Wood v. Raffensperger, November 25. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=417
Trump v. Raffensperger, December 4. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=414
Pearson v. Kemp, November 25. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=401
Boland v. Raffensperger, November 30. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=403
King v. Whitmer, November 25. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=410
Johnson v. Benson III, November 26. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=411
Johnson v. Benson II, November 15. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=384
Costantino v. Detroit, November 9. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=367
Stokke v. Cegavske, Finally one that was filed before the election was called. This one was filed on November 5. There is nothing in the document you linked nor in this link: https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=352 that indicates in any way that any injunction of any sort was put in place to delay or cease any count. It did not delay the results.
Law v. Whitmer, November 17. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=387
Rodimer v. Gloria, November 19. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=390
Becker v. Cannizzaro, November 18. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=389
Ziccarelli v. Allegheny County Board of Elections I, November 12. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=378
Ziccarelli v. Allegheny County Board of Elections II, November 16. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=385
Ziccarelli v. Westmoreland County Board of Elections, November 18. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=391
Donald J. Trump for President Inc. v. Bucks County Bd. of Elections, November 9. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=369
In re: Canvass of Absentee and Mail-In Ballots of November 3, 2020 General Election V, November 10. https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=383
Your source is factual and reliable. But it does not say what you falsely claim it does.
I called it. You’re moving the goalpost…
Here’s your original assertion:
Your source does not support it, and I explained at length how.
You didn’t even read one word of my reply.