• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 hours ago

    That’s the crazy part, unless they’re “outlawed” billionaires should try and improve people’s lives since it means they would have more money to spend on the crap those billionaires are selling! It’s hard to sell stuff on Amazon if everyone is struggling to afford housing and food.

    • Prehensile_cloaca @lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      9 hours ago

      UPS just laid off 20K workers on the expectation that Amazon deliveries will be way down.

      Container ships are down 60%. More than any month during the pandemic.

      Trump is imploding the entire economy.

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Better to rule in Hell than serve in Heaven.

      They could work to remove the destitution and desperation of working people. But if their workers weren’t in such dire straits, then they wouldn’t have so much power over them. Workers with good pay and a healthy work-life balance also have more time to pursue unionization and other political activities. Even if improving the lives of the people would objectively increase the wealth of the ultra-rich, it would still decrease their power. And ultimately, the only reason people ever obtain that level of wealth is because they desire power more than anything else. People who aren’t power-hungry monsters cash out and retire early long before they reach billionaire status.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Workers with good pay and a healthy work-life balance are unlikely to pursue unions. That’s the stuff unions are trying to achieve.