This lawyer got so much free advertising out of this. He’s probably got clients booked out for years now.
NGL this is sick af and I would NOT fuck with this law firm.
Is dragon fursona correct? I would think is more accurate to say dragon scalesona, no?
I’ve got some serious doubts about the character of anyone who presents themselves as a purple dragon.
https://dragons.fandom.com/wiki/Purple_Dragon_(Dungeons_%26_Dragons)
The Purple Dragon (Dungeons & Dragons) is a type of dragon in the Dungeons & Dragons universe. It is an evil-aligned chromatic dragon.
Purple dragons, often confused with deep dragons, are possibly the least well known of the chromatic dragon family. Most surface creatures have no knowledge of the existence of purple dragons. Many of those that have heard of purple dragons dismiss such stories as myth or misconception. After all, in the darkness below the earth, who can say whether a dragon’s scales are purple or black?
Black dragons rarely live far underground. The deeper explorers descend, the more likely they are to encounter a purple dragon than a black. People who live permanently in the deep hollows of the earth know purple dragons as an all-too-real and a much feared threat.
A purple dragon is a talented manipulator of other creatures. It achieves control through lies, misdirection, and direct mental domination. A purple dragon might seek control for any number of reasons, including sheer delight in bandying its power about, a desire to form a bulwark of allies and thralls for security, or curiosity about newly discovered tunnels or crevices leading to unknown areas deeper below, for which recruiting bands of disposable explorers might serve its purposes.
Don’t bullshit around with people’s legal representation. You’re a professional with a responsibility to the client and the profession. Take your shit seriously.
You know, with all the crap going on in the U.S. right now I’m ok with the watermark
Yeah, no need to resort to linking to Reason.com articles.
That’s their domain
Based on the Reddit thread I linked to, they have two (which do not host the same website).
There’s also https://firebreathingdragonlawyers.com/
Both of them are only a month old.
$ whois dragonlawyerspc.com|grep "^Creation" Creation Date: 2025-03-30T17:01:47Z $ whois firebreathingdragonlawyers.com|grep "^Creation" Creation Date: 2025-03-30T08:14:12Z $EDIT: Also, if either domain had lapsed and was simply re-registered at that point, archive.org’s Wayback Machine had never indexed it prior to that point.
Check the links in their footer
Our platform integrates AI to lower the cost of legal services
Yeah, very much not what I want from my lawyers, thank you
Wait until they turn up to court wearing it.
Good. Some places should keep their dignity.
Yeah but the article is about the American court system
My God that is absurd looking. I can understand like a little logo in the right hand corner or something. But the whole page? And every time they’re their name is listed it’s bolded purple and capitalized? Wow
“We do not have a standard document format, but please do not make your filing look like Time Cube, it’s not very professional” -the judge, probably
Oh, the literal wording is freaking great.
Use of this dragon cartoon logo is not only distracting, it is juvenile and impertinent. The Court is not a cartoon. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 1) is STRICKEN. Plaintiff is directed to file an amended complaint, containing the same allegations as the original complaint, without the cartoon dragon by no later than May 5, 2025.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall not file any other documents with the cartoon dragon or other inappropriate content.
Judge is having none of this bullshit.
I can understand like a little logo in the right hand corner or something.
There is also a little logo in the right-hand bottom corner.
Right? It’s like they did reasonable and then just blew past it
Sure, but when the government does it, it’s fine: https://www.dcma.mil/News/Article-View/Article/3258274/opsec-history-from-ancient-origins-to-modern-challenges/
Damn, I’m usually an uptight fuck and think furries often bring this aspect of their identity into places where it isn’t appropriate, but I think the judge has a stick up their ass here and 100% agree with drag. The judicial branch is a joke when this fucking chode gets to treat the highest court in the land as his fascist rubber stamp, but these people get their complaint stricken by a magistrate judge for a cute, harmless cartoon of a dragon.
I mean, not really. This is weird shit to put in a legal document and is pretty pointless. It’s also just hard to read due to contrast issues (which can be particularly relevant depending on any disabilities of interested parties, etc.). Like I’m pretty sure there is text on there that does not meet WCAG guidelines.
It’s definitely not appropriate for a court document. I’d go farther and say putting anything to dramatically draw attention to oneself in a court document is inappropriate. That’s simply not what court documents are for. They should strive to be as mundane, uninteresting, an impartial as possible.
There are a lot of absolutely terrible judges out there, which I’ll never dare to excuse. But this particular instance isn’t anywhere on that level. The judge is merely saying to cut this bullshit out and resubmit it without it.
From the records:
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 1) is STRICKEN. Plaintiff is directed to file an amended complaint, containing the same allegations as the original complaint, without the cartoon dragon by no later than May 5, 2025.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall not file any other documents with the cartoon dragon or other inappropriate content.
Reddit’s lawyer forum had some discussion:
https://old.reddit.com/r/Lawyertalk/comments/1ka9oc1/lets_all_start_filing_pleadings_with_a_giant/
The trial court ordered them to refile without the cartoon dragon, but did not order them to refile without a cartoon dragon.
This needs to be regulated. Like allowable D&D dragon type scales to years in practice
So, are chromatic dragons allowed at all, or just metallic? Or maybe just gold, for the lawful aspect.
Circuit split. Ninth Circuit allows chromatic obvi but Fifth has said only metallic
The judge missed the opportunity to put the order on paper with a sick dinosaur watermark
Go to his website. https://dragonlawyerspc.com/
Our platform integrates AI to lower the cost of legal services
Millennials who grew up on anime are hitting the age of finishing their law degrees and I couldn’t be prouder
Sorry to tell you but I’m a millennial in law school right now and all my classmates are zoomers. 😬
Millenials?
Three or four years of study at a law school accredited by the American Bar Association (ABA)Oct 20, 2022 https://www.purduegloballawschool.edu/ How Long Does It Take to Become a Lawyer in … That’s five years of education followed by maybe 2 years of work on the job training) which works out a lot cheaper.Mar 23, 2025 https://www.reddit.com/ US Lawyers, why is Law school so long in the US …
Does this person think 40 year olds are just finishing their law degrees? Or is this evidence of a bot with data only dating up to 2013?
Ones who grew up on anime so I’m assuming the young end of millennials
Are you aware just how long anime has been around? There are boomers who grew up on anime. Astro Boy is from the 60s.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall not file any other documents with the cartoon dragon or other inappropriate content.
Sorry
Removed by mod
Nah, they addressed that in the thread — I only grabbed a subset. Said that they’d need a more-dignified dragon to address that.
