• Omega@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    He was prisoned on corruption charges before, which were just government funds being moved

    • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 hours ago

      What content broke the laws? Can you give more info? BlueSky has been pretty good so far so this surprises me

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      There needs to be some sort of unblockable self-hosted broadcast system where users can spin up their own cloud hosted instance by entering a username and password and choosing one of hundreds of providers for a small fee, or self hosted instance as quickly and easily as installing a single app on an android phone. These with act just like websites, but with a common protocol and API so they can communicate with each other and with clients with no specific add-on. Then, Turkey or whoever could block Turkish ISPs from fulfilling that request, but anyone else could still access the instance in their client as long as their own instance doesn’t block it.

      Hostable on a phone, a windows PC, Linux PC, self-hosted VM, cloud rented VM, whatever. And easily portable from one place to another.

      Sure, uptime and reliability would suffer, EG when PC is turned off, but that’s acceptable to gain resilience against ISP, central services like google and Facebook and twitter, and government interference.

      I have designed a system to do this, using very reliable existing protocols and programming frameworks, I just don’t have the time or money to invest to make it happen.

      • biofaust@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I have discovered the Gemini protocol yesterday.

        Hosting what they call a capsule would be easy and extremely lightweight and I could surf from an index using an app called Lagrange, available on F-Droid.

        Can you explain how your system differs?

      • helopigs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Hah, I designed one as well!

        I think the flow of information has to be fundamentally different.

        In mine, people only receive data directly from people they know and trust in real life. This makes scaling easy, and makes it impossible for centralized entities to broadcast propaganda to everyone at once.

        I described it at freetheinter.net if you’re interested

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, he needs a Mastodon account ASAP.

      BlueSky has the exact same issue as Twitter, corporate control.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      BlueSky would ban his account as well. It was banned in Turkey because of a legal request by the Turkish government. If they don’t comply there are huge legal consequences.

      Would BlueSky, the huge fans of censorship that they are, challenge the decision in court like X are though? Not a chance.

  • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    A little context might have been nice, but then the musk hate and conspiracy theories would be harder to justify:

    X restricted Imamoglu’s account in Turkey complying with a legal request by Turkish authorities who cited national security and public order concerns.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      The context is in the article in the OP. It doesn’t really matter. Elon is notoriously apathetic about the law. He could choose not to comply as he does so very often and realistically face very little in the way of repercussions. But that’s how little he actually cares about free speech.

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The context is extremely important in this one. It changes the sentiment from “Musk is censoring the political opposition because he supports the government” to “Musk complied with the legal demands so as to not have to remove X from the entire country of Turkey, and is fighting the demands in court as he says they are censorship”.

        X is now notoriously law abiding, but also notorious for fighting against government ordered censorship in court. They comply with legal orders so as to not face legal trouble, and then file legal challenges - even going so far as to pay for and help with legal challenges for individuals who the government are censoring.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 hours ago

          It’s not important. Elon did not say “I’m a free speech absolutist within the confines of the law”. Free speech absolutism does not make exceptions for law.

          Further, those legal demands were made by a foreign country with no authority over him or his company. Here’s some helpful context: Elon doesn’t even recognize the local authority but suddenly he bends knee to authority demanded from the other side of the planet? Nah.

          • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            19 hours ago

            It absolutely does when you’re running a business.

            Companies operating in a country need to follow that countries laws, or they can’t operate in that country. Fact.

            Why do you think the GDPR laws were such a big deal worldwide?

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              19 hours ago

              It absolutely does when you’re running a business.

              It absolutely does not. If you’re running a business you simply don’t refer to yourself as a “free speech absolutist” because it’s fucking stupid.

              Companies operating in a country need to follow that countries laws, or they can’t operate in that country. Fact.

              Then a “free speech absolutist” would stop operating in that country. Fact.

              • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                19 hours ago

                So you think the best way for a company to fight a government trying to eliminate free speech from their country is to……checks notes……remove their product that is used by millions from said country?

                Not to take them to court to fight their attempts to stifle free speech, but to just……leave?

                • Ulrich@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  “Free speech absolutism” is not “the best way” to do a God damn thing. This has nothing to do with the “best way” to do anything. It’s about the owner being a pathological fucking liar.

    • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Complying with the incumbent to silence opposition is a political decision. Erdoğan is known for silencing and jailing opposition and anyone with knowledge of Turkish politics is aware of this

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Complying with the incumbent to silence opposition is a political decision.

        No it’s not. Did you even read the linked X Global Affairs post?

        Lack of compliance with these orders can lead to severe sanctions, including throttling of the entire platform in Türkiye. X complied with the court order while we challenge the order in court because we believe keeping the platform accessible in Türkiye is vital to supporting freedom of expression and access to information, particularly following natural disasters and other emergencies.

        It’s not a political decision, it’s a legal one. If they don’t comply then the entire site can legally be banned from the entire country, for example.

        • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Yes I read that and hold that this decision is still highly political. Technically X can choose to simply not exist in Turkey. Obviously they won’t do this and Erdogan knows this, profit is king. This doesn’t change the fact that they are choosing to cow to threats by a dictator. Legal decisions are political and have political implications. Who do you think wrote those laws?

          • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            So you think that instead of complying while fighting the legal order and being able to tell users that what is happening, you think that they should pull the entire site from the country?

            They aren’t “choosing to cow to threats by a dictator” - they are following the law, and fighting the legal order through the courts.

            Come on mate lol. They’re doing the absolute most user and free speech friendly thing they can possibly do given the situation.

            Question - what would you have done in this situation if you owned and ran X?

    • Gsus4@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yeah, he is forced to, but just to be clear, he will bitch for a month if this happens for even more legitimate reasons in any country that is a functioning democracy e.g. UK, Brazil, Biden US, Germany, South Africa…

    • DancingBear@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I used to use it to find out information on local emergencies and stuff but now you have to log in and they don’t allow search or whatever so I never use it… I have a few accounts there but haven’t used them since at least x if not before I should probably mass delete my accounts there next time something happens

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Nazi platform.

    Make sure to stop clicking on Nazi links when people post them. No matter how bad you want to see someone “prank” someone or cry about their perceived persecution.

    We need to stop making a Nazi platform important enough that it hurts democratic politicians when they lose access because of the Nazi in charge of said platform.

      • biofaust@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I know they would comply just as well, as I stated in another comment, because they are a private platform, but actually in this case the presence on Bluesky of the Imamoglu account in perfect condition with 129K followers proves that something else must be the case here.

        Also, X didn’t give a shit about complying in Brazil.

        Nah, Nazi platform does nazi stuff, it’s that simple.

        You can come down the mirror now.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Bluesky blocked his account in turkey btw, just like X did. Bluesky have made no mention of challenging the legal request in court like X have though.

          Iirc the Brazil situation was the first time anything like this had happened since Musk bought Twitter. They definitely didn’t handle it correctly, but they’ve clearly learned since then. Now they comply with legal requests and challenge them through the courts. Would you prefer they just folded every time and didn’t challenge, like all the others? Like Bluesky?

          Good work on calling me a nazi though! I did nazi that coming!!

          • biofaust@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            The fact that Bluesky didn’t post about it doesn’t mean they did not challenge.

            Also, a file on Google Drive is not a petition submitted. There is nowhere a letter signed or stamped as received.

            You know you can pay a law firm for drafting a letter and then not send it, right?

            There are too many conclusions you are coming to without knowing the actual facts.

            I judge what happened for sure.

            And for sure both of them complied, officially asked to or not, to obscuring a political prisoner’s account (and dozens of other activists as well, by the way).

            Also, regarding X, this is old news, from the end of March.

            Also, are you X? Like, the platform, its personification? Because if you are not, then I didn’t call you a nazi. You can go clean your snot from your neckbeard.

            • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              19 hours ago

              So your position is that X aren’t challenging the censorship request in court?

              That’s one hill to die on I guess.

              The X post is from the other day, not March.

      • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        You’ve called the good guys here the nazis and let the actual authoritarians off the hook scott-free.

        Only if you ignore that Twitter is owned by a nazi, and that the person above didn’t say anything about letting, the authoritarian regime in turkey off the hook.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      and if you absolutely must see something on twitter, use xcancel instead.

      its a frontend for the same content, that doesn’t add views or ad revenue to twitter.

    • Jin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I hear often Nazi this Nazi that? I think it has lost meaning. Can you explain what Nazi is? Vs Nazi from like WW2?

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think it has lost meaning.

        It has. Completely. Basically what it means today is “people who disagree with me” and should be regarded as such. Unfortunately the actual nazis will fly under the radar now.

      • dudinax@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Some people wouldn’t know a Nazi if he was sending people to camps without trial, trying to outlaw the political opposition, fomenting a cult of personality, launching coups, oppressing the most vulnerable people, ratcheting up racist attacks, and threatening to attack Denmark.

      • gradual@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        The word ‘nazi’ has 100% lost its meaning.

        Might as well just be saying “I don’t like this person or group of people because they disagree with me.”

        • SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Nazis are opposed to the basic human rights of anyone who isn’t a white hetero, usually a man.

          Nazi sympathisers deserve a bullet in the head. That includes you.

          • gradual@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            I guess we can start adding ‘nazi sympathizer’ to the list of terms that have lost their meaning.

            Remember, you only have people like yourself to blame.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        As a serious answer, Musk is into modern variants of eugenics and some scary techno-authoritarian stuff he shares with Peter Theil and other Silicon Valley royalty.

        Maybe he’s a techno-neonazi? That’s just semantics.

        His alleged Nazi salute is indeed kind of a red herring. But “Nazi” is an reasonable enough descriptor for his beliefs.

              • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                It really isn’t. It’s not even close. You said I had gold medal mental gymnastics, but you’ve just done another gold medal performance.

                E: but thank you for pointing out my typo

                • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  His gesture is as much of a “Nazi salute” as Elon Musks. They’re either both Nazi salutes, or neither are. No other option.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Tim Waltz does not have eugenics-adjacent beliefs.

            Also, I think you may have misinterpreted what “red herring” means.

            • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              I didn’t misinterpret that, I was simply pointing out that it wasn’t a nazi salute unless you also think Tim Waltz is a nazi.

              • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                And you are bringing up a red herring (salutes) that doesn’t matter, because, well, I don’t know. But that’s the whole point of the saying.

              • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                Yes notice the crisp snappy way waltz did it? With fingers together, and twice so there is no way to doubt what it was? Ohhh wait sorry that was elons.

                • Gsus4@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Yeah, elon’s not a nazi…

                  …he just wanted to send out a message of hope and support to nazis round the world by siegheiling twice on stage behind the seal of the United States…yeah…

        • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Note how Jin, the Nazi Defender (not a Nazi themselves, they just defend people who are justifiably called Nazis) won’t respond to your answer.

          One feature from Reddit I liked was the ability to tag people. Or maybe that was the reddit enhancement suite. But Jin would’ve earned himself a big red “Nazi Defender” tag.

          • stopdropandprole@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            you can also tag people on Lemmy, or at least I can. look for the About User menu then “Add Tag” or “Tag user” from their profile

            • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              Hmm… I definitely don’t see an About user menu or Add Tag or Tag User on their profile. Maybe it has something to do with your lemmy browser.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Nah its much simpler label than that.

            “Troll”

            The topic doesn’t matter, it more about fishing for provocation. In this case I couldn’t help myself, but… you know, don’t feed the trolls.

          • Merva@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            You are the one being all sensitive and whiney about people calling out Musk. You need to grow up and learn people aren’t beholden to your disingenous bullshit.

            • Jin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              simple asked what the difference was and if there was anything substantial. Jews and other still use x or Tesla , people are being aggressive if you talk about it.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you perform a Nazi salute, you’re a Nazi.

        Musk performed TWO Nazi salutes on national television during a presidential inauguration.

        Musk owns X.

        Anymore questions? Do I need to illustrate with crayons?

        • Jin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Some would say a Roman salute 🫡 So anything else substantial? That can’t be interpreted as something else?

          • biofaust@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            Italian here, Roman actually.

            The Roman salute has not origin in ancient history.

            It was formalized by Gabriele D’Annunzio, a sick fascist poet and writer, as a salute for his proto-fascist troops with which he occupied Fiume in modern-day Croatia, having been inspired this painting.

            So yea, the roman salute is a fascist salute, invented by a fascist, for a fascist occurrence and to call it roman is a disservice to Rome and history in general.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ekrem is Kemalist, which is very similar to a literal Nazi, but in the current world I’ll even agree he’s kinda better than many other variants.

      • LupertEverett@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Ah yes, the guy who had no ill will towards anybody, tried to unify people to the best of his ability, and provided cheaper food for the poor… is a Nazi!

        Holy shit, the sheer stupidity needed to come up with such a take!

        • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.bascul.in
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          The dude is trying to delete Mustafa Kemal’s name everywhere, claiming he is a kemalist is the equivelant of calling Stalin a nazi,

          • muhyb@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            It is from a point of view of political science. He hates Ataturk but that doesn’t prevent him to use his methods.

            • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.bascul.in
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              he isnt comparable the toenail of Mustafa Kemal. All he does is selling off state properties and factories, polar opposite of what Ataturk did.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          I know, it’s basically impossible to be a politician in Turkey and not some kind of that.

          If you look at most Sunni societies, their political ideology optimal point is simple - behead all the infidels, take all that belongs to Muslims, and that’d be all that Muslims claim, and institute Sharia law.

          Young Turks and Kemal managed to transform that into a viable nationalist ideology. To be centered on Turks instead of Sunnis.

          No secular regime in a Middle-Eastern Muslim country after them has managed to achieve that.

          So - Erdogan’s Muslim part in ideology is about equating Muslim and Ottoman, not about returning to the initially described system.

        • rolling@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Ah yes, I can see how you can see the guy who used religion all his political career to his advantage and shat on the constitution just so he can stay in power longer, as a Kemalist.

          /s

          • LupertEverett@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            Like legit, the guy hates Ataturk’s guts, yet these idiots claim that he is a Kemalist.

            I want what they are smoking. Must be some pretty good shit.

    • Gsus4@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think elon called Lula a dictator…and called the UK a dictatorship. That makes it even more obvious what he’s doing.

        • Gsus4@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Yes, but that’s not a dictator fetish (ok, it is, but it is a different one)… He knows dictators are a bad thing to be, because he calls the people he doesn’t like one. But he never calls out actual dictators, he actually makes deals with them and helps them. That says he likes and respects that model of governance, even if he knows it is deeply unpopular and deeply disrespects functioning democracies. And uses it to rouse his stans.