crosspostato da: https://piefed.social/post/741601
Few topics in cycling inspire as much controversy as helmets. Some people insist they’re essential, calling non-wearers reckless and invoking harsh and violent imagery: “enjoy your traumatic brain injury”. “You’ll regret it when you’re in a hospital with a feeding tube”. You hear suggestions of denying access to public healthcare. On the opposite end, helmet skeptics argue that they’re a distraction. I’ve actually heard people call them “magic hats” that “don’t offer significant protection (if any at all)”. Helmets dehumanize cyclists and send the wrong message. They’re dorky and uncool, rather than fashionable and European.
So what’s the truth about helmets?
Keep Urbanity rolling:
Join our Patreon for early releases, credit at the end of each video, and bonus content: https://www.patreon.com/ohtheurbanity
Contact form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1NeALCmO6ELwJAGPyV46BVbl5JXzjlWl6emH3ZRNiCiw/edit
Subscribe on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCN5CBM1NkqDYAHgS-AbgGHA?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ohurbanity
BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/ohtheurbanity.bsky.social
For professional inquiries, please fill out the following contact form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1NeALCmO6ELwJAGPyV46BVbl5JXzjlWl6emH3ZRNiCiw/edit
References:
- Protection provided
Bicycle helmets – To wear or not to wear? A meta-analyses of the effects of bicycle helmets on injuries (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0001457518301301)
- Risk compensation
Drivers overtaking bicyclists: Objective data on the effects of riding
position, helmet use, vehicle type and apparent gender (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0001457506001540)
Bicycle helmet wearing is associated with closer overtaking by drivers: A response to Olivier and Walter, 2013 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0001457518309928)
Emotional reactions to cycle helmet use (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0001457512001169)
Risk compensation theory and bicycle helmets – Results
from an experiment of cycling speed and short-term effects
of habituation (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1369847816305666)
Risk compensation? – The relationship between helmet use and cycling
speed under naturalistic conditions (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022437517307302)
Bicycle helmets and risky behaviour: A systematic review (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847818305941)
- Level of risk
Sport-related major trauma incidence in young people and adults in England and Wales: a national
registry-based study (https://injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/injuryprev/30/1/60.full.pdf)
Active Living and Injury Risk (https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-2004-819935)
Epidemiology of injury in professional cyclists (https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/44/Suppl_1/i4.2)
- Discouraging cycling
Do the Health Benefits of Cycling Outweigh the Risks? (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2920084/)
Bicycle helmet research [CARRS-Q Monograph Series - Monograph 5] (https://eprints.qut.edu.au/41798/)
The effects of provincial bicycle helmet legislation on
helmet use and bicycle ridership in Canada (https://injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/16/4/219)
Recommend or mandate? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the
effects of mandatory bicycle helmet legislation (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S000145751830397X)
Helmet law makes nonsense of bike hire scheme
- Dehumanization
The effect of safety attire on perceptions of cyclist dehumanisation (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847823001018#b0200)
- Claims bike helmets don’t help
https://www.cnet.com/science/brain-surgeon-theres-no-point-wearing-cycle-helmets/
https://www.rwcpulse.com/blogs/peeking-at-plans/2023/09/25/bike-helmets-01/
- Dutch statistics
https://swov.nl/en/fact-sheet/cyclists
https://www.veiligheid.nl/sites/default/files/2022-06/Rapportage (Snor- en brom)fietsongevallen in Nederland.pdf (English summary included)
Most stupid discussion ever. I remember a couple of years ago when there where motorcycle riders protesting a new helmet law ( I think it was NYC). Dude won the Darwin awards smashing his head and it was concluded that he probably had lived if he had a helmet.
Have a cousin who is a nurse, she mentioned seeing an anti-helmet protest on the news, amongst the protesters were some of here dialysis patients. I guess one way to speed up the transplant queue.
Even if you exclude injuries from automobiles, head injuries are far and away the most common serious injuries people get while cycling. This entire debate is idiotic. Wearing a helmet is such an easy thing to do and has basically zero downsides.
I’m still not gonna
I have seen far enough people died who could have survived if they wore a helmet. I rather keep wearing one. The same thing when in any two wheeled vehicle.
Here’s the thing…yes, wearing a helmet is less safe than having bike infrastructure. No doubt about it.
But I don’t fucking HAVE safe bike infrastructure. Also, I am very involved in bike safety advocacy, so I’m not exactly just shirking all safety responsibility onto a silly hat and expecting things to be fine.
We can throw off the dualistic thinking for a second and acknowledge that, yes, helmets are a very imperfect solution that puts the onus of protection onto riders. Also, it’ll save your goddamn life.
If I didn’t wear a helmet, I never would have gotten married and my kiddo would never have been born. I’d have died on a sidewalk (or in an ambulance) on the side of a residential street on a multi-use path where a dumbass teenager was going 35mph the wrong way on an electric scooter at night.
This video is a great example of a seemingly simple topic having more nuance than you might expect.
When I was a teenager I had a bad wipe out cycling off road doing about 30mph that resulted on me landing on my head. I was knocked out, swallowed my tongue, and if it wasn’t for my friends stopping myself from choking to death I would have been dead, as it was I had a concussion and an overnight stay in hospital. But if I had not been wearing a helmet I would have been dead on impact. I think its pretty telling that all my friends invested in helmets after that.
Even in non car areas you can fall from relatively low speeds and have a bad time.
What I do not like is that a significant number of other road users are more likely to see you as less human for helmet wearing than not: https://road.cc/content/news/cyclists-wearing-helmets-seen-less-human-301661 This has a negative impact on how they treat you on road.
Ever since I learned in motorcycle training that having your head go into a immovable surface (curb, tree, etc) at just 10mph can easily kill you, I wear one while skiing and bicycling. Just like seatbelts in a car, I don’t feel safe enough anymore without wearing one. I’ve always worn ‘heavy’ helmets for the motorcycles anyway, so the lighter ones for bikes and skiing are barely noticeable.
Yeah, the truth is, there are a lot of opinions out there but the vast majority of people are absolutely clueless about how vulnerable human brains are. We have to learn everything the hard way.
If you can wear shoes, you can wear a helmet. It’s not that hard.
@lgsp I’m a fan of requiring them over 25kmph. Yes this is largely unenforcable, so no one will be fined. But it still gives the message that if you go fast you should wear one.
But it also gets out of the way of people riding to the corner store for milk
This shouldn’t even be a question.
Two bicycle accidents here, both involving cars who couldn’t be bothered to look around them when circulating. In both cases the helmet saved my life.
When I see hipsters on their brake less fixie with no helmets to make sure their hair don’t get messed up, it makes me shiver. It’s such a simple thing to do that brings a maximum of protection.
It depends on your city.
In the Netherlands you’d probably be laughed at for wearing a helmet.
The bicycle infrastructure makes it so safe here, kids cycle alone to school across busy roads from the age of like 7
I recommend watching the YT channel Not-Just-Bikes it’s fascinating and I wish more counties were built like the Netherlands
As a BMX flatland rider (not in traffic), I’ve found that helmets cause the rider to be unnaturally top heavy, which affects the abilities of the rider to perform a lot of tricks, particularly the many one wheel tricks the sport has to offer.
If anything, in BMX flatland, elbow pads, knee pads, shin guards, and perhaps gloves, offer the most necessary protection for the sport. Pretty much all flatland riders ditched helmets back in the 90’s for the very reason I mentioned, it affects the balance while performing complex tricks.
Now as far as regular road commuting, even though I’m not one to wear a helmet, I would tend to recommend a helmet for the average rider. Vehicles are big and heavy, and plenty of drivers out there don’t pay nearly enough attention to bicycles or pedestrians.
And that in itself brings up another question:
If bicycle riders should wear helmets, then shouldn’t pedestrians also wear helmets…?
I’m sorry, a 10oz helmet will not make a 150-200lbs person “unnaturally top heavy” and all those other pads protect body parts that can be repaired. The brain is a one time deal. Wear a helmet, always.
Clearly you’ve never rode flatland then. Flatlanders don’t fall on their heads, they fall on their knees and elbows, and sometimes the top tube smacks their shins.
It’s the stunt riders that do ramping and other tricks that leave the ground that risk crashing on their head. Flatlanders stay on the ground. Well, minus the occasional bunny hop.
Like I said, basically the entire BMX flatland community has already agreed on this back in the 90’s. Go ahead and find me even one single flatland rider these days that wears a helmet. The last video clip I saw of flatlanders wearing helmets is from 1985.
Go ahead, look up professional BMX flatland competition. None of the pros wear helmets, and it’s not in any of their rules. For the very reason I mentioned, it affects delicate balance.
Look up Jomopro and Voodoo Jam…
Literally nobody in BMX flatland wears a helmet anymore. If they did, then the pro competitions would require it.
Experienced flatlanders know better, helmets just distract the rider and throw off the rider’s natural flow, and actually make it even more likely to wreck.
Flatland ≠ Traffic
@over_clox @lgsp no, motorised vehicles shouldn’t be able to hit pedestrians and cyclists. Mostly because their is a right to walk, not drive a car.
There are a lot of things that shouldn’t be, but we gotta face the facts. There are way too many ignorant drivers that either barely know how to drive, might be just plain assholes, or just staring at their phone instead of the road…
Ignoring electric bicycles and high speed riding/racing bicycles, I’m not sure if I see the activity of riding a bicycle any more or less dangerous than walking, unless of course the bike rider doesn’t have good balance or awareness of their surroundings, which could apply to either bicyclists or pedestrians.
Both bicyclists and pedestrians share pretty much the same risks when traveling near vehicle occupied roads. If anything, I feel that pedestrians are generally more at risk. They are smaller in the visual field of vehicle drivers, they move slower, and they’re not wearing reflectors or protective gear.
The average comfortable cruising pace on a bicycle tends to be around 12 miles per hour. Most bicycles are pretty agile and quick to control. I mean, compare the stopping distance of a ~4000 pound vehicle going 12 miles per hour to the stopping distance of a ~200 pound rider plus their bike, to the speed and stopping distance of a ~175 pound pedestrian on foot…
So, if anything, pedestrians are more in danger, at least the way I see it.
@over_clox The key bit there being, why are cars allowed on things that were safe for pedestrians?
No, the key bit there is why do pedestrians cross the road? To get to the other side, same as bicyclists.
@over_clox at grade crossings should be rare ;)
I actually had to look up ‘grade crossing’ to even understand what you were getting at.
Rare? Hah, it happens every single day here! Not saying it should though, also not saying that trains should have a right to just fucking park on the tracks here and block traffic either, but they do.
But… What does that have anything to do with crossing the road or highway, either on foot or on bicycle?
@over_clox Yes, the concept is from rail, but it applies to all crossings/intersections.
The point is we lost a lot when we decided that it was okay for death machines to have right of way all around us. We shouldn’t accept it as normal.
Oh that’s so hilarious that I forgot to laugh…
How the hell does any cyclist or pedestrian get across the road to get to the store or to their friend’s house, or to work even?
@over_clox why are cars allowed there. That is the way arountd I’m push
Having used my helmet multiple times it’s fairly obvious to me they actually performa a useful function. As far as I’m concerned the only controversy is whether they should mandatory or not (and I don’t think they should). But otherwise, if you choose to wear one I think you ARE doing yourself a favor wearing one.
For me, the truth is I barely notice I’m wearing a helmet, and cars barely notice me as a cyclist even exists.
So even if a helmet only does half of what it claims to do, I’ll take that chance in an accident with a giant metal box on the road.
Biking is safe whether or not you wear a helmet. The life-extending advantages of biking outpace the life-shortening risks either way. If wearing a helmet makes you more comfortable and you bike more, then that makes a bigger difference than the helmet itself.
Conclusions
On average, the estimated health benefits of cycling were substantially larger than the risks relative to car driving for individuals shifting their mode of transport.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2920084/
Even without a helmet, cycling is a safe, beneficial activity. Helmets offer significant protection if you fall off your bike or crash it (though much less if a car hits you) but the absolute rates of injury are small enough that this is a personal judgement call.
I would be dead a few times if not for my bike helmet.
I really like Oh The Urbanity; been watching them since perhaps early on in the pandemic. Not Just Bikes also