hellostick@lemm.ee to Linux@lemmy.ml · 13 days agoVirt-Manager, use deb version of flatpak version??message-squaremessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1message-squareVirt-Manager, use deb version of flatpak version??hellostick@lemm.ee to Linux@lemmy.ml · 13 days agomessage-square5fedilink
minus-squareliliumstar@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·13 days agoI would use the native version. For something like this, it makes sense that it should have less restricted/sandboxed access to the underlying system.
minus-squarealteredEnvoy@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·13 days agoHmm, wouldn’t the virt manager just be a frontend and communicate with the virtd socket though?
I would use the native version. For something like this, it makes sense that it should have less restricted/sandboxed access to the underlying system.
Hmm, wouldn’t the virt manager just be a frontend and communicate with the virtd socket though?