This reminds me of both the Ford Pinto recall story, and all the Ayn Rand nonsense adventure novels.
A sensible AI safety bill would be like:
The person or organization outsourcing the work to AI is responsible for the damages it causes, including death, injuries, wrongful arrests, financial damages, and discriminatory practices. In case of the AI vendors advertising the models as “infallible”, perfect, then they can be also held responsible for the damages.
But techbros don’t believe in responsibility, or it is only for the plebs, towards them.
This reminds me of both the Ford Pinto recall story, and all the Ayn Rand nonsense adventure novels.
A sensible AI safety bill would be like:
The person or organization outsourcing the work to AI is responsible for the damages it causes, including death, injuries, wrongful arrests, financial damages, and discriminatory practices. In case of the AI vendors advertising the models as “infallible”, perfect, then they can be also held responsible for the damages.
But techbros don’t believe in responsibility, or it is only for the plebs, towards them.