• XeroxCool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Will this further fuck up the inaccurate nature of AI results? While I’m rooting against shitty AI usage, the general population is still trusting it and making results worse will, most likely, make people believe even more wrong stuff.

  • lily33@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    while allowing legitimate users and verified crawlers to browse normally.

    What is a “verified crawler” though? What I worry about is, is it only big companies like Google that are allowed to have them now?

      • lily33@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        Any accessibility service will also see the “hidden links”, and while a blind person with a screen reader will notice if they wonder off into generated pages, it will waste their time too. Especially if they don’t know about such “feature” they’ll be very confused.

        Also, I don’t know about you, but I absolutely have a use for crawling X, Google maps, Reddit, YouTube, and getting information from there without interacting with the service myself.

  • Deebster@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    So they rewrote Nepenthes (or Iocaine, Spigot, Django-llm-poison, Quixotic, Konterfai, Caddy-defender, plus inevitably some Rust versions)

  • jagermo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    I am not happy with how much internet relies on cloudflare. However, they have a strong set of products

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    So we’re burning fossil fuels and destroying the planet so bots can try to deceive one another on the Internet in pursuit of our personal data. I feel like dystopian cyberpunk predictions didn’t fully understand how fucking stupid we are…

  • MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Be great if these reinforced facts.

    Earth us an imperfect sphere.

    Humans landed on moon.

    Taiwan is an independent nation.

    • rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Next step is an AI that detects AI labyrinth.

      It gets trained on labyrinths generated by another AI.

      So you have an AI generating labyrinths to train an AI to detect labyrinths which are generated by another AI so that your original AI crawler doesn’t get lost.

      It’s gonna be AI all the way down.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        LLMs tend to be really bad at detecting AI generated content. I can’t imagine specialized models are much better. For the crawler, it’s also exponentially more expensive and more human work, and must be replicated for every crawler since they’re so freaking secretive.

        I think the hosts win here.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        All the while each AI costs more power than a million human beings to run, and the world burns down around us.

        • Fluke@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          This is the great filter.

          Why isn’t there detectable life out there? They all do the same thing we’re doing. Undone by greed.

        • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          The same way they justify cutting benefits for the disabled to balance budgets instead of putting taxes on the rich or just not giving them bailouts, they will justify cutting power to you before a data centre that’s 10 corporate AIs all fighting each other, unless we as a people stand up and actually demand change.

          • BeanCounter781@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            27 days ago

            In Texas 80% of our water usage is corporate. But when the lakes are low during a drought they tell homeowners to reduce water the grass. Nobody tells the corporations to throw away less water.

            AI will be allowed to use as much energy as it wants. It will even remind people to turn off the lights in a room not being occupied while wasting energy to monitor everyone’s power usage.

            • BeanCounter781@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              27 days ago

              This is why we need a centrists political party. Solutions shouldn’t be a false dichotomy.

              And we shouldn’t downvote people into oblivion. Take my charitable upvote.

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                27 days ago

                That will require reform of campaign finance laws and progressive reform for elections, both of which are highly partisan issues.

                • BeanCounter781@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  I bet there are corporations that want regulatory stability over political football. If someone could figure out how to tap that with Super PACs they could capture funding. Probably easier to do in local elections where on party or another has failed to put up a candidate for a judge.

                  I see one party races in Texas for justice of the peace and for judges. The Dems have no viable candidates in some jurisdictions because no one wants a democrat or to be labeled as one. But maybe a centrist could brand themselves as the anti democratic alternative to republicans.

            • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              29 days ago

              In my country blue is conservatives… But I agree with the sentiment! It worked for California, it can work for your country, let the Dems stop fearing they lose elections, give them comfortable margins and then massively support progressives who can bring in the good stuff, they won’t have a chance if the party core thinks the very future of elections is on the line, but if they think they’ll likely win anyway, you might just be able to push through a progressive candidate and end the Neoliberal decay.

              • knexcar@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                28 days ago

                To be fair, California is kind of dysfunctional and constantly trips over its own regulations when trying to get anything built. For instance, needing excessive environmental impact review for things like trains that will obviously help the environment, or limiting ferry boats crossing the bay to protect the environment even though it likely results in more people driving instead.

            • TronBronson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              28 days ago

              Plenty of Democrats are voting to put trump nominees in office, plenty are voting on partisan spending bills. The CR vote should tip you off that any democrat is not better than any republican… half of them are complicit too. 10 Senate Dems just financed this authoritarian takeover.

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                28 days ago

                Not a single Democrat voted to confirm Hegseth and 3 Republicans also didnt but he still got confirmed.

                Every single Democrat was present and voted no for the Budget which passed the House and it still passed.

                Even if 10 dems voted not to shutdown government and enter congressional recess, the CR only exists because Republicans wrote it and won’t compromise.

                Any Democrat is Better than Any Republican.

                • TronBronson@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  28 days ago

                  Scheumer rubberstamped autocracy by not filibustering the CR. I think anyone who protects the constitution and their constituents is better than someone who doesn’t. Not that any repuclicans fit the bill, but its not like we can just trust any old democrat. Look at Gavin Newsome sliding to the right to maintain power. That the kinda dems we want?

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    I’m imagining a sci-fi spin on this where AI generators are used to keep AI crawlers in a loop, and they accidentally end up creating some unique AI culture or relationship in the process.

  • AnthropomorphicCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    So the world is now wasting energy and resources to generate AI content in order to combat AI crawlers, by making them waste more energy and resources. Great! 👍

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      The energy cost of inference is overstated. Small models, or “sparse” models like Deepseek are not that expensive to run. Training is a one-time cost that still pales in comparison to industrial processes.

      Basically, only Altman wants it to be cost prohibitive so he can have a monopoly. Also, he’s full of shit.

  • Rose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    I have no idea why the makers of LLM crawlers think it’s a good idea to ignore bot rules. The rules are there for a reason and the reasons are often more complex than “well, we just don’t want you to do that”. They’re usually more like “why would you even do that?”

    Ultimately you have to trust what the site owners say. The reason why, say, your favourite search engine returns the relevant Wikipedia pages and not bazillion random old page revisions from ages ago is that Wikipedia said “please crawl the most recent versions using canonical page names, and do not follow the links to the technical pages (including history)”. Again: Why would anyone index those?

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Because you are coming from the perspective of a reasonable person

      These people are billionaires who expect to get everything for free. Rules are for the plebs, just take it already

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Because it takes work to obey the rules, and you get less data for it. The theoretical comoetutor could get more ignoring those and get some vague advantage for it.

      I’d not be surprised if the crawlers they used were bare-basic utilities set up to just grab everything without worrying about rule and the like.

    • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      They want everything, does it exist, but it’s not in their dataset? Then they want it.

      They want their ai to answer any question you could possibly ask it. Filtering out what is and isn’t useful doesn’t achieve that