• circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s more expensive for a worse game than V or VI, both of which can be had for the price of dirt.

    Not surprising.

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Civ6 still isn’t in a state that I’m happy with playing it over civ 5, or even civ4. What makes them think I’d give civ7 the time of day?

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think a lot of people are waiting for the first Civ7 expansion pack to be released, whenever that may be.

    Civ 6 without R+F, GS feels like a completely different game. As an example, in vanilla you can expand anywhere right up to someone’s borders whereas with the expansion straying too far from your territory you could just lose it to influential pressure from neighbouring cities.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think a lot of people are waiting for the first Civ7 expansion pack to be released

      I’m waiting for the last Civ7 expansion pack to be released.

  • Omega@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I haven’t tried civ7 yet but I really like humankind, the only 4x game that I actually finished thrice. If only Humankind didn’t die, maybe it would have had more content added.

  • Evotech@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I mean, each of these games are just the same as the previous but with less content more or less?

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They do make changes throughout the series, but every new game is a complete reset to a basic game so they can sell you all the DLC and expansions to make it into a full game.

  • Vytle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The game is lietarlly half cooked, and they clearly wanted to sell the other half piecemeal as DLC.

    The game literally only has 3 eras. Every other civ game has 6.

    But don’t worry, they’re adding Mount Everest.

    What a fucking joke

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That felt like Civ 5.

      Playing it on launch, it was so bare.

      Playing the Complete version, it was finally fun to play.

  • cholesterol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m sure I’ll move on at some point, but I’m currently running maybe 30 mods on civ 6, and they are mostly QoL. Parts of both gameplay and UI are just poorly thought out even to this day. So I was expecting the new game to be released in a state I’d dislike. It might take longer to improve than I thought, though.

  • absquatulate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Isn’t this the rule with every civ launch? They’re all somewhat half-baked on launch (although 7 admittedly looks quite a bit less baked than the others).

    That said, I feel Civ formula seems to be in decline. To me Call To Power was peak civ ( yeah, fight me ), but while 3,4 and 5 were great “second-bests”, I couldn’t really get into 6 and I’m not really planning on playing 7 ( not with this 3-age format anyway ).

    • octobob@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      At a certain point they’re beating a dead horse. Outside of graphical updates (which I thought the cartoon-y look of the leaders in civ 6 was a huge downgrade), the core gameplay is still mostly the same throughout the series.

      I watched a video on civ 7 and it seems like they really tried to shake up a lot in the game, I think for this reason that they needed to try something fresh to stay relevant. But really this is to its detriment rather than benefit.

      I’m not sure if the three age thing is to “even the playfield” on those marathon long sessions when one civ runs away with the ball so to speak, but really that’s one of my favorite parts of the series. Like it’s awesome to take out some cavemen with navy seals or launch nukes when everyone is cowering in fear. If everything gets massively reset, then why even try to get ahead? I’ve not played the game so there could be more nuance but that’s my general impression.

    • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah releasing an unfinished game without any exciting new changes and adding more dlc each iteration has been killing new civ releases and burning many long term fans who get hyped for a new civ. Paradox, Ubisoft, MicroProse, etc pull the same predatory monetization shit and when the price tag is 70 USD their half baked, missing ingredients cake just doesn’t look appetizing to most.

  • AarynBlack@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Everyone knows you don’t buy a Civ game the first few years it’s out.

    As far as I’m concerned, they are still in the beta test for at least the next 2 years, then MAYBE I’ll think about grabbing it.

    • Higgs boson@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I own 6 but still havent played it much.5, on the other hand, I still play a few hours a week.

        • Higgs boson@dubvee.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          But… I already have it, though. I just never play it because I am pretty happy with 5 and it runs better on my macbook.

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Same with Paradox games. 4X in general is just really hard to get right on release because of how many interlinking systems there are, so waiting for balance updates at a minimum is never a bad idea.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    From what I’ve seen, Civ 7 is trying too hard to be Humankind. I don’t really want try it.

    • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean, the ages thing grew on me. It was way too common in other civs to just snowball early and dominate the rest. Any modern civilization was just bad, because by the time they got online it was over.

      • MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It also speeds up the games a bit. I simply do not have the time as a full adult to sink 10+ hours into a single game. I have actually finished every game of Civ 7 I’ve played so far, which has never happened with any prior Civ installments at my current playtime.

      • CarnivorousCouch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, I am enjoying the age mechanic as a new approach to the formula. It’s not without its flaws, but in previous Civs after a certain point I just stopped playing/didn’t finish games when the outcome was clear. I’m doing that less now.

        • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Honestly the flaws I have the biggest complaints about is the God awful UI.

          Incorrect tool tips, no drag and drop, no ui for city connectivity, no renaming cities, disappearing entities.

          It’s genuinely painful at times.

  • shiroininja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Holy shit, 5 is 15 years old now?! It still feels new. How old is 3?! Because that is my first civ

    • Gremour@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      My first was Civ1 and I’ve played hell out of bith 1 and 3. Perhaps feel the same about 3 as you about 5.