• Draces@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    This site is maybe the worst echo chamber I’ve ever experienced it’s just one that suites my opinions. Hell even if I agree with the echo chamber but I’m the wrong way it gets rejected aggressively. If you think it’s bots then that seems like a more legitimate complaint but if it’s a repost getting enough upvotes and is not weighted for controversy then it’s actually the terminally online people that know every post suffering with their obsession and not the community at large. I completely disagree with that theory

    • fishos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      So when I wrote about bots, I was describing them as an effect created by a cause. You went and reversed the two and are thinking I blamed bots.

      No.

      What I said was that voting based moderation is a popularity contest. An easy way to win popularity contests is to stuff the ballot. On the internet, you can do this with bots. Ergo, the rise in bots all over the Internet is a consequence of our popularity based algorithms and systems. That type of moderation just doesn’t work. But please, keep misunderstanding people and then blaming others. I’m sure that’ll help.

      If you’re gonna disagree with my idea, at least get it right. You’re not being downvotted heavily for not agreeing with the hive mind in the right way. You’re being downvotted for lacking reading comprehension and going off on a crazy sounding tangent.

      • Draces@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I did not misunderstand your bot theory but good to see you prove my “even if I agree” point lmao

        • fishos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          You ended your comment saying you completely disagree with me after reiterating what I’d just said as if it were your own thought.

          You really need to work on your communication and reading comprehension buddy.

          • Draces@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            If you think it’s bots then that seems like a more legitimate complaint

            An easy way to win popularity contests is to stuff the ballot. On the internet, you can do this with bots

            You really need to work on your communication and reading comprehension buddy.

            Maybe try a mirror bud

            • fishos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Try reading the whole thing and comprehending it as a complex thought with nuance. I’ll wait. Might take you awhile but I’ll wait.

              • Draces@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                On boy are you dense. I agreed if your theory that bots are to blame is correct you have a legitimate complaint I dispute that and you got really confused and angry saying I don’t understand instead of anything of substance. Do you know what projection is?

                • fishos@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  I never said bots were the problem. I said people caring more about popularity is the problem and that once you realize this it’s super easy to program bots to imitate people by up voting/down voting what you want. But yes, call me dense when you’ve misconstrued my argument from day one.

                  Edit: didn’t look like my previous comment posted so I rewrote it. Considering how dense you are tho, maybe two versions will help you finally understand, so I’ll just leave it.

                  • Draces@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    I never said bots were the problem

                    it’s super easy to program bots to imitate people

                    Considering how dense you are tho

                    Hmm…

                • fishos@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Because I never said bots are to blame. People are and once you realize that, programming a bot to do what people can do is super easy.

                  I get offended when people try to tell me I made an argument I never made. But thanks again buddy 👍