Summary

Barack Obama sharply criticized Donald Trump’s presidency during a speech at Hamilton College, condemning attacks on the press, immigration crackdowns, and threats to civil liberties.

He called it “unimaginable” that Trump’s actions—such as barring the AP and threatening law firms—would have been tolerated under past presidents.

Obama warned that Trump’s behavior, though “goofy,” poses real danger, and he labeled Trump a “wannabe dictator.”

He also referenced former Trump aide John Kelly’s “fascist” remark and urged Americans not to mistake chaos for leadership.

    • Demdaru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 hours ago

      If you thought the country needed you and you thought you could really help our nation, is there even a one percent chance you’d consider running?

      “Just between us, and the readers of this magazine — there’s zero chance,” Mrs. Obama replied.

      Yeah, can’t say I am surprised. I mean, she saw what that did to her husband. Not sure how it looks from USA pov, but from outside, the man visually aged two decades during his cadency.

  • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Obama allowed the Republicans to viciously kick him around for eight years, yet he never stopped trying to appease them. He should have ruthlessly prosecuted the crimes of the illegitimate Bush administration, and showed the proto-Nazi Republican party that treason would not be tolerated. If he had, there never would have been the environment for MAGA to rise. But he failed us, like all those corporate, Republican-Lite Demopublicans.

    Now he’s still playing the same old game, like most of them, pretending that its business as usual, and letting HitlerPig get away with being Putin’s muscle, as he actively, gleefully destroys America, right in front of our faces, ss he plays golf. Nero fiddling while Rome burns.

    How long do we have to tolerate obvious TREASON before we stop it? Do we have to wait until the entire Democratic free world has collapsed, billions of people have died, and Sociopathic Oligarchs are sitting on top of the pile, smoking cigars and drinking expensive scotch, and gloating about their success, before we can finally admit what we already know right now, BEFORE the carnage - that the destruction of Democracy was their plan all along?

    It’s time for some coalition of respected leaders, including military, to step up and end this madness decisively. There are a lot of potential tipping points (a war against NATO allies, leaving NATO, an alliance with Russia/ China/ N Korea, attacking Canada/Mexico, giving away Alaska and/or Taiwan, a draft, disappearing American citizens without due process, designating citizens as terrorists for exercising free speech, etc), but the one bright red line that can NEVER be crossed, is elections. If HitlerPig suspends elections for ANY reason at all, it will become time to literally execute the entire MAGA leadership. That is precisely why the Founding Fathers created the 2nd Amendment, and we should honor them by applying it as they intended.

    • melfie@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      He should’ve also jailed the oligarchs responsible for the 2008 crash, but as revealed in Wikileaks, his cabinet was selected in an email from Citigroup. Obama is also a war criminal with all of the civilians killed in his many drone strikes. Everyone was excited about the first black president, but he was just more of the same, except with more melanin. Along with helping the decline of the American healthcare system by slobbing the knobs of the insurance oligarchs with ACA, the economic prospects of an entire generation were ruined. The broken trust during his presidency was largely responsible for the USA going from its first black president to its first orange one.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I can’t argue with this at all. Obama was huge disappointment.

        I can’t say i was surprised. When i saw him at that giant rally after his election, with everyone going wild at how much things were going to get better, I just knew it was going to be more of the same neo-liberal, Republican Lite bullshit we’d had for the Clinton administration. I doubted it would seem much different than the Bush administration. Throughout his campaign, with the slogan of Hope & Change, it seemed like he leaned much harder on the Hope than the Change.

        His constant appeasement with Republicans when he had the majority in Congress really pissed me off. He consistently deferred to them, altering legislation to suit them, hoping it would draw their votes, and they kicked him in the balls every time. You’d think he’d learn after the first couple, but he didn’t, but he still gave into them over and over, without anything in return but disdain.

        And he really blew it with Obamacare, which was a perfect example of his appeasement strategy. It was an improvement on a broken system, but just because the tub drains a little quicker doesn’t make it fixed. He could have created a new system, but he adopted Romney’s system and dropped the public option, all to attract Republican votes, and they all voted No anyway, thanks to McConnell.

        If you are going to create and pass Republican legislation, just become a Republican and be done with it.

  • Lit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Just call him for what he is, A russia agent, Krasnov Trump.

    And stop calling them Presidents, they are public servant. re-label the term to “Head Public Servant”.
    So that everyone is reminded everyday who they are supposed to serve.

  • demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Barrack gave us trump when he let home owners eat shit and the bankers walk free. Even Bush was going to give home owners some reprieve, and asked Obama if he wanted to proceed and Obama told him " there is only one president at a time". When he came in to power, he bailed out the banks.

    • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      He campaigned explicitly on a platform of change and then proceeded to install a cast of deeply entrenched establishment figures to shore up the establishment at the expense of common people. Classic switcheroo.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh my god shut the fuck up about it being “unimaginable”. They published the playbook online for anyone to see in 2020. They said they would follow the playbook. They are now following the playbook. They are completing sections of the playbook as written. They will continue to complete sections of the playbook as written, until they are either done executing the playbook, or removed from power somehow. None of this is a surprise. You are not allowed to be surprised by this.

    • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is a straw man. Obama was not saying that nobody knew what project 2025 was planning. He’s saying that prior presidents could never have gotten away with behaving in ways that Trump behaves, and doing things that Trump does.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    he labeled Trump a “wannabe dictator.”

    Sure wish Democrats would quit downplaying the threat.

    • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Exactly. I just posted this in another thread…

      • He is setting tariffs on his own, a power designated solely to Congress by the Constitution.

      • He is having masked police kidnap people off the streets without warrants and shipping them to an overseas gulag without trial or even charges.

      • He is illegally refusing to distribute money allocated by Congress to certain states in order to punish them for not doing his bidding.

      • And when the courts have ordered him to stop doing the above, he has willfully ignored those court orders with no repercussions.

      Exactly what more needs to happen for this to be a dictatorship?

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I agree. It’s absolutely fucking infuriating.

      “Aggressively and rapidly installing himself as a dictator” would still be understating a bit.

  • elatedCatfish@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Would love to vote for this Obama guy if he has the chance to run again. Do it, Republicans. No balls.

    • fake_meows@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s the funny part: if Trump and the supreme court somehow finagle a new legal loophole for the constitution, then Obama will get elected.

  • jimjam5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    If any President in recent history should return for a third term, I’d vote for Obama again in a heartbeat.

    • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Obama was “boring”, that is exactly what you want in a president. Just sitting there doing his job, not trying to get on TV or the news every damn day.

      Although if you did want to look closer, he was very engaging to listen to. So, not boring in that sense.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 hours ago

        No, that’s exactly what I don’t want in a President. Sitting there, doing their job and not trying to get onto the TV news every day is perfect for, say, an EPA grant administrator. But the drafters of the Constitution fucked up by making the President both the head of government, and the head of state. The former should be an administrator, and the latter needs to be a leader. It’s not the framers’ fault, the world just didn’t have a lot of experience with huge democracies back then. The trouble is that “huge” is too much for the human mind, and abstract thinking doesn’t come naturally to us. A worrying proportion of the population can’t do it at all. Instead, we conceptualize our nation through a parasocial relationship with the leader. In that role, the President should be on TV, and in the news every day, influencing the citizens.

        The UK has its own problems, but at least their system splits the job. They have a head of state, King Charles, whom everybody can relate to as the embodiment of the nation, more or less aside from political disagreements. (This role was far more effective when Queen Elizabeth was on the throne, to be sure.) They also have a head of government, the Prime Minister, who attends to making things run. Each can focus on their particular role. But we don’t have that luxury in the US, and Obama needed to continue the energy of the campaign even after taking office.

      • kipo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Don’t forget that Obama was also a war criminal, just like the other US presidents in recent history.

      • WarmRegards@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes, the boring drone-striker-in-chief who’s crowning achievement was the half-measure ACA (notably a Republican plan). Were you folks just checked out during those 8 years or not alive yet?

        This is all cult of personality bullshit.

        • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          It sounds like you were the one checked-out, I guess if news isn’t fed to you, you have no idea how to find out what happened.

          https://washingtonmonthly.com/2017/01/03/obamas-top-50-accomplishments-revisited/

          His presidency did largely coincide with the timing of when drone strikes were starting to be possible to do.

          https://www.businessinsider.com/president-obamas-super-aggressive-drone-war-in-one-graphic-2013-12

          Would it be better to have used soldiers or missiles for those attacks instead? If you had the choice between sending people to do that job and some of them dying, or sending expensive missiles and killing a bunch of extra people, what’s the downside of drones comparatively?

          Really, the main downside of his presidency is that he did such a good job, it pissed off racist people.

          • WarmRegards@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 hours ago

            You sure typed a lot to not refute one thing I said. Your only argument is, “Well, we HAD to kill those people somehow!” Very telling.

            • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              20 hours ago

              Who is “we”? I have nothing to do with the states.

              And yes, those wars were indeed still gonna continue happening at that moment in time, no matter who got elected. And some of those words I typed were links you maybe didn’t click, cuz they very much do refute your points. And include how many wars he wound down and/or ended during his time.

        • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          I certainly didn’t specifically mean you as an individual. But I have a hard time believing you actually thought I did…

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      it lowkey became inevitable when the democrats didn’t make blocking trump from ever being president their #1 focus

      • freely1333@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Became inevitable when democrats ran Biden the first time… anyone with two brain cells could tell a Biden that doesn’t deliver some absolutely insane legislation was done. He even ran on being a one term president. He needed to stay on that path hard and allow a real primary group to form so there were competing ideas out against Trump. Saying everything is great in the face of massive inflation isn’t really going to cut it.

      • longjohnjohnson@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        They wanted to beat him again in another election. I’m pretty sure Biden had the DOJ drag their feet specifically so he could beat him again in another election.

        • orcrist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          It was said that the DOJ did that on their own. From inside sources, I think believable. But Biden didn’t fight them.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Pretty sure the reasoning was that biden was only barely able to beat trump in 2020 and wouldn’t be able to beat anyone else.

          • longjohnjohnson@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yup, and now the world suffers because of democrats unwillingness to say or do anything that might give the impression that they’re making anything even remotely a political attack.