• Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    My neighbors daughter had one of those water guns. I told her if she shoots at me, I’ll get the hose and retaliate. She grinned, shot at me, and ran away laughing.

    I talked to her dad, he nodded, and when she came back for more mischief, she got wet.

  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Idk,

    Shouting “Hey, don’t do that” loud and clear may be more effective.

    • kid may have thought they where alone and will get jumped from getting caught.

    • May alert the parents their kid is up to mischief.

    • Doesn’t potentially start an escalation war with neighbors

    • Doesn’t carry the small risk of the child falling or otherwise getting hurt with you as an easy blame.

    Think of it like this: Does the kid now understand the “evil” of their actions to try be better next time. Or will they feel vindicated by their parents support against your “evil”

    • bob@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Or will they feel vindicated by their parents support against your “evil”

      Then that’s a parental problem, not a problem caused by the action.

    • scrion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’re right, but this is fuck around and find out territory. I would want the escalation to make it clear where I stand with my cat.

  • cynar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    As a parent, if my kid did that, I’d likely side with the neighbour. I would put it (very loosely) in the category of “natural consequence” punishments.

    It fits the crime, it discourages the crime, it forces empathy with the cat, and it does no real harm.

    • wuphysics87@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I like that approach. But when the parent only has their kid’s half of the story, it’s understandable why they would be pissed. I think most of us would be. Why did they do that to my kid? I’d want answers amd I wouldn’t be happy about it.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I suspect most kids who would throw water at a cat like that would not be very good liars about it. Also, adults tend not to dump water on kids for no reason. I would definitely take the time to pick apart what happened, before going full papa bear mode.

        I might be pissed, but my instinct would be to find out who I should be pissed at first, before going on the war path.

        • wuphysics87@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I agree with you personal. I meant more that people are irrational and if dad comes out back and the kid is soaked and crying, the kids most likely going to say idk she did this to me for no reason

    • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is my favorite answer. I’d argue that he got less than the natural consequences of his actions. In nature, when one assaults another, even with something as harmless as water, it’s usually reasonable to interpret it as a threat, the response to which is usually violence. That kid is lucky he didn’t get a face full of claws. I’ve gotten a lot worse from gently touching cats that, as it turned out, didn’t want to be touched. Boundaries are important.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Natural consequences doesn’t mean “law of the jungle” here. It just means linking cause and effect in a proportionate manner.

        I tend to use a lot of “natural consequence parenting”. Basically, the response should flow from the cause. If you throw water over your friend, you can’t then complain if they throw water over you. You learn that, while it’s fun when expected, it can be deeply unpleasant when unexpected.

        It’s a lot more effective than random generic punishments. The trick is shielding them from excessive results, while allowing proportional ones to play out. E.g. swinging on a chair will get a warning, but often not stopped. When they fall, there’s an “I told you so” before/with the cuddle. If there is a risk of a more serious injury however, e.g. the corner of a table where their head may hit, then I step in and stop things.

        • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t have kids but this is pretty much how my dad raised me. It made me really respect when he gave me a hard no for something, it meant “no really the risk majorly outweighs the reward” and even if I didn’t understand it at the time I trusted it. I got a lot of I told you so after varying seriousness of injuries lol. Eventually I learned that the soft warning meant I was going to have a lot of fun but I needed to be ready for if it went sideways. Now I’ve got a pretty healthy sense of my own limits and when to start gauging risk/reward

          • cynar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s basically the goal I’m aiming for. It’s also worth remembering to always give an (age appropriate) explanation with the “no”. If you’re using a hard no, then there is something they don’t yet understand. Explaining it lets them integrate that knowledge into their future risk management.

            The only downside is their confidence is high enough to terrify me! The job of containing and shaping that confidence, without damaging it gives me plenty of grey hairs.

        • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It’s not really about the proportion. The rest you have right. Things (good or bad) may happen as a result of your behavior (good or bad). Those things are natural consequences. We talk about it a lot in the context of punishing behavior, but natural consequences can also reinforce behavior. Of course, if we design those consequences, they’re no longer natural.

        • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          As a native social media pedant, I’d just like to take a moment to split hairs and point out that’s the literal definition of that phrase.

          With all that said, I’m glad you’ve taken that approach. They’re very lucky to have you. I wish I could’ve had more adults like that in my life as a child. Here’s to you and your contribution to supporting the next generation. May they pass on those values, too.

          • cynar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s why I clarified. There’s 2 ways to read the phrase, one a lot harsher than the other.

            It seems to be working well. It also results in me being surprised a lot of the time. I’m ready to deal with a scuffed knee, or a bruised ego. Instead they either get back up and try again, or just pull it off. At that point I need to mentally correct for their new capabilities.

            The key thing is, I’m not looking after a small pet, I’m training a future adult. They need to both instinctively understand how the world works, while packing as much awesomeness and magic into the formative years as possible. Letting them learn and practice is a big part of that.

    • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think it depends a bit on where the cat is. If my cat is in somebody’s yard and the owner does not like it, it’s perfectly fine to spray my cat with water. In fact I do the same to my neighbours cat to prevent cat fights. If my cat is on neutral territory, I would be more pissed.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Agreed, there are 1001 context points that could change things around, one way, or the other.

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Everyone here balancing the ethics of getting wet like it’s assault.

    Water melts snowflakes and wicked witches, everyone else need not worry.

    All living things should be used to being wet either all the time or somewhat regularly. To think beyond that, wow, society has its teeth in you and you are lost.

    • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It is assault, though.

      Kid acted maliciously towards the cat. It’s not like the kid accidentally knocked a bottle of water and some of it splashed the cat. No. There was a conscious decision to torment the cat by deliberately throwing water over it.

      Punishment fits the crime here.

      • Godric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Or the cat could secretly be a wicked witch, who then vows to make an evil AI to contact aliens in order to slay all humans in revenge. Who knows what monstrous things could happen as a consequence of getting a cat wet???

        • saltesc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I never thought of it that way.

          battle snare drum to a montage of buying Super Soakers, ending with a one-liner to camera…

          …It’s time to get some pussies wet… and witches. But mainly the pussies because the aliens. Damn it, I ruined the one-liner.

    • solarvector@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I agree with the “don’t be shitty to animals” sentiment, but I’m honestly a little surprised no one else has bothered to consider how shitty that cat might be. If it was always shitting in your yard, picking fights your cat or dog, using your bird feeder as a cat feeder, and tearing up your flower beds, then a cup of water is a pretty benign deterrent that still has a chance of being effective.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        If they’re caught in the act, sure. A great cat training tool is a spray bottle of water. But from the story it sounds like the cat wasn’t doing anything at the time, so even if it is a nuisance animal, no correlation is made with an act and a punishment. Not true on the kid, he got something right when he did his malicious action, so if he has any intelligence he might connect the two and not do it again.

      • y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Lol minus the birdfeeder thing you just described dogs.

        Cats bury their shit, tend to avoid dogs / fights with bigger animals, and I’ve never seen one dig up a flowerbed.

        • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Cats bury their shit

          In your flower bed, which is how they get torn up. Then when you go to fix them: smelly shit

          tend to avoid dogs / fights with bigger animals

          That’s cute, cats in my area love fighting everything

    • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Exactly. There are endangered birds and amphibians who call my garden home. I do not want cats going in there and killing them for sport.

      Get a catio! Don’t destroy native wildlife.

  • Surp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    You can tell the people in here thinking it’s ok to retaliate like that are people that live alone with cats or in their parents basement with cats. I have cats and children. Y’all this isn’t the way to go about this.

    • WanakaTree@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Seriously my first thought if I saw this all occurring and my kid came complaining to me about it is I’d just say “well this is how the cat feels”