• snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Well done meat can counter a number of contamination issues, but can’t undo toxins already created by bacteria in meat that wasn’t kept to a safe temp or a lot of really dangerous stuff like mad cow disease.

      • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Oh boy prion diseases are coming back!

        But I didn’t know that bacteria toxins was a thing but that explains why we don’t keep spoiled meat

        • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Yeah, toxins are often the bigger risk when dealing with bacterial or fungal issues.

          For instance, botulism is caused by the toxin produced by botulinum bacteria. The toxin is a paralytic. The bacteria itself can typically be dealt with by the immune system, but the toxin wreaks havoc on the nervous system.

          That’s also why you should never feed honey to babies; botulinum is commonly found in honey. Babies’ immune systems aren’t equipped to deal with the botulinum bacteria, which allows it to bloom and start producing the toxin after they ingest it. This causes something called Floppy Baby Syndrome, from the baby being paralyzed by botulism toxin.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          It depends on the bacteria, but in short the toxins are bacteria waste and it builds up the more active the bacteria are and how many there are. That is also why you can’t just reheat already cooked food to make it safe again.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Whenever a corporation does something good (for example, make a charitable donation) rest assured it’s been calculated that the positive PR will make it financially worthwhile.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        That’s a wild misrepresentation of how write-offs work.

        If your tax rate is 30% and you make write off a charitable donation of $100, your tax bill goes down $30. Spending 100 dollars to save 30 isn’t the key to riches.

        There’s no way to save money through charitable donations.

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            The implication was that they make donations for the write-offs. That’s not accurate, because it’s never cheaper to make a donation and write it off than it is to just pay the taxes.

      • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        It decreases your tax burden in the same way that giving away all of your money to charity decreases your tax burden.

        And in case people need it cleared up: Donating at a register during checkout also does not help the company on their taxes. Its the same as you donating individually except they get the PR for it.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          Them getting the PR for it is a financial inventive (future sales) even if it doesn’t save them money on their annual balance sheets. It is comparable to advertising.

          • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            Yep but honestly I still don’t think the benefit matches what they spend. Especially true since they often match donations or make their own large donations.

            And after all, if they’re helping money go to charity by advertising it to their customers, I’m fine with them getting a little benefit in return.

        • magnetosphere@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          I hate it when a store asks me to donate at the register. I’m probably spending more than I want to anyway, and I’m sure the store has a bigger budget than I do. I’m like “fuck off, stop guilt tripping me, and donate yourself.”

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Damn, just five minutes ago I saw this link shared in another thread:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swill_milk_scandal

    🤢🤮

    It took us well over a century to establish some sort of framework that makes such horrors almost impossible, but no, regulations are bad 🙄

    Same for workers btw, it’s not just about food security. That’s just easier to sell to a thoroughly egoistic constituency.

    • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      There were no regulations that couldn’t ever n made unrefrigerated raw milk safe in cities at the time. You either sold milk from cows raised in the city itself(which means cramped quarters and disease) or carted it in on a wagon (which means unrefrigerated milk sitting for hours). Adding formalin likely made it safer, it was so dangerous. The scandal thing played like it was what they were feeding cows (we feed cows high protein spent grains today and it’s considered high quality feed), but the reality was milk in cities was always insane.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I feel like there’s at least one country who is going to learn this shit the hard way.

    • atthecoast@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      China has learned it multiple times. The plastic additives in baby formula causing infant deaths…

    • slappypantsgo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      1000% my first thought. These nutjobs who say “just get some fresh air” are coasting upon the millions of dead and buried who paid the price for us to have longer healthier lives. Strict stringent food safety. Mandatory vaccines without exemptions.

    • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Fun fact:

      The precursor to the FDA was created during Theodore Roosevelt’s administration. After the book was published, Roosevelt sent federal investigators to the Chicago slaughterhouses to validate the conditions detailed in the story.

      The investigators reported that the conditions were worse than described in the book. And that was after the slaughterhouse owners got wind that the feds were coming and had everything cleaned from top to bottom.

      Hard to imagine what “worse” looks like because the conditions detailed in the book are truly appalling.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Additional fun fact, The Jungle was meant to highlight the poor working conditions in slaughter houses, but the outrage was related entirely to the poor consideration for the meat that the public was eating.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Not sure if you intended this, but you can absolutely get what you wrote to work with the timing (and same rhyme sounds/pattern, basically) of the first few lyrics of Guns N Roses ‘Welcome to the Jungle’, with minor modifications.

      Welcome to the Jungle,

      where we play dirty games.

      Food safety sure costs a lot,

      so fuck the FDA.

      We are the people who hate fines,

      Whatever they may be.

      If you got no money, honey,

      We got your disease.

      etc.

      (Wonderful that some of the lyrics don’t have to change at all, nor really the chorus, yay internal bleeding.)

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          I mean… the original song’s use of that phrase arguably references a woman basically being forced to give bjs to her dealer in order to get drugs she’s now addicted to…

          All of this is terrible!

          • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            Sad thing, that original song would still apply - but now for safe baby food, carrots, or maybe a sack of flour. A lot of people are going to do things that they never expected to do.

            We are going to live an cursed existence. 💩

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Love the cover:
      The Jungle Upton Sinclair

      [Incidentally and entirely off-topic, it reminds me of the book(s) I’m reading right now: Josiah Bancroft’s Tower of Babel tetralogy - urban steampunk jungle, vertically]

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    But RandLover1988 on YouTube told me businesses have to sell good things otherwise competitors will come in and they’ll go bankrupt, unless there are too many regulations and too much socialism, which is why he got banned for saying the N-word on YouTube. /s

  • psivchaz@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    My favorite “we had to regulate this” is coal mining. You see, the larger a coal mine tunnel, the more work and time it takes. So smaller tunnels will be more profitable. So in some places they preferred smaller women and children, so they could make make smaller, easier tunnels. This one I only ever found one source on, but supposedly one mine owner noticed that snags on clothing were slowing things down in the narrow tunnels so he insisted on sending them in nude. Nothing more capitalist than naked coal mining children.

    • Gloomy@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I realy would like to fact check you on this, but i will definitely not search for “naked coal mining children”. “Trust me bro” will have to do it for this one.

      • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        That miners often worked naked or partially naked is definitely true. That children, men and women worked together in mines is also true. If it’s legally allowed, then it’s going to happen basically.

        That there were owners who preferred children/women over men, is probably false. They will have tended to do different jobs in the mines, but I can’t recall having ever read anything about a mine that preferred to not employ any male miners.

        That the workers worked naked because of owner mandates is also going to be false, because those miners used to be paid according to how much they extracted, so there was no reason for the owner to have such a mandate. Instead it was the workers their own choice: some clothes hinder them in their work (heat, snagging, dust) + the job eats up clothes + they have to pay for their own clothes = they’re not going to be wearing many clothes at work.

    • arrow74@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      The fact that these fucks were not regularly dragged from their mansions and beaten to death blows my mind

      • Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        That’s because you view things like this as isolated acts done by a few people. But don’t forget, only 1/3 of US voters tried to stop a man who openly declared himself a fascist, had already had a direct hand in the spread of a world wide plague that killed millions.
        The “they didn’t know what they were getting into” excuse is no longer valid. And yet 2/3 of voters were fine with him being reelected . The reason those people weren’t dragged from their mansions and beaten to death was because of all the other monsters who were protecting them. The people who weren’t committing atrocities themselves, but benefited from it enough to help it keep happening.

      • neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        You’re not dragging Trump out and beating him to death. So why expect of your ancestors what you can’t do today?

        I’m not shaming nor advocating btw, just explaining.

      • BearGun@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        as humans, our arguably greatest trait is the ability to adapt to almost any circumstance. unfortunately that also often makes us accept unacceptable living conditions because changing them involves too high of a personal cost.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Someone somewhere recently pointed out that fascism tends to rear its ugly head every 100 years because everyone that experienced it last time has to be dead before it can happen again.

    Americans specifically have had it generally good for so long that anyone incapable of picking up and absorbing information from a history book, which is most Americans, simply don’t know how bad it used to be. So they fucking sleepwalk into fascism or allowing regulations to be rolled back.

    You’d think that having a written language to chronicle all our mistakes would ensure that we moved forward without repeatedly making those mistakes, but the catch is the majority of people have to read the fucking words for that to matter.

    • BlackSheep@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Hence, the defunding of education, and specifically critical thinking. That is by design. You can’t easily control the population when they can read and think for themselves.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Exactly. Critical Thinking is the literally the most imoportant skill you cn learn. Critical Thinking is what allows people to recognize nonsensical propaganda immediately upon hearing it, and reject it.

        It worked for me back in the late 80s, when Rush Limbaugh got started. He had a very entertaining delivery, but I was easily rejecting his unsourced bullshit and blatant lies, while people were calling in praising him for “opening their eyes.” Dude, he’s entertaining, I get that, but that doesn’t mean he isn’t lying to you.

        • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          I was 12 or so when my dad started listening to Limbaugh. I had zero clue about politics, but I could tell the guy was a scumbag. So glad he’s dead. I danced a jig in my cubicle when I found out.

          • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            He used to support tobacco companies, was a tobacco cancer denier, and wanted to end the embargo with Cuba so he could get their cigars cheaper. His cigar habit ended up killing him prematurely.

            He deserved the cancer that killed him, but I wish his death had been so much worse.

    • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      but the catch is the majority of people have to read the fucking words for that to matter.

      Hell, I’d even settle for more people watching classic movies and TV shows. People need to maintain some link to the past to see the mindset of those who lived through fascism, wars, etc. and absorb what a society that rejects those ideas looks like.

      Culture is a big part of our collective memory, and a society that can’t look back will just reinvent the same problems.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        It would be cool if someone made a “transported through time” miniseries that showed exactly what living in that period with those problems was like. I think it could be very popular.

        • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Watch the show Connections. It was made by the BBC in 1978 and does exactly this, but more science focused. The show holds up really well.

        • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          I can see that being an isekai manga. Say, by the person who did Spice & Wolf?

          Oh, by the way, check out Barefoot Gen. It was written by a person who was a boy when the atomic bombs hit Japan. It covers the post-war period, including the corruption and day-to-day life of a shattered Japan.

    • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I think it would help to have history-oriented comics and manga in schools. I learned to enjoy history, in no small part on account of Larry Gonick’s Cartoon History of the Universe series. Making things approachable is how people progress from knowing nothing to being a college graduate.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      When I told my parents how we got things like the 40 hour work week they were fucking mortified. Something seemingly so inconsequential, many people died for.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Yup.

        People died to give workers rights and now we’re electing anti-worker presidents and giving those rights away. It’s sickening.