Welcome to FPTP

Musk and team (including his possible puppet trump)

Are fully expecting this. 2016 to 2020 was an eye opener for the wealthy who wanted control. They saw an incompetent trump support group not suffer due to slow or non response from the 3 branch system.

So they got competent arseholes to back him and plan to win this civil war before the rest od the US even recognises it as a civil war.

All the US checks and balances are non existant when the curruption uses it to slow down opposition.

Honestly consumers are not told. We are encouraged and the price of energy is the greatest encouragement.

Advertisers have the same encouragement. But their motivation is based on how effective the advertising is to the company.

Its not like anyone is arrested for not reducing use.

And with under 16m signatures. That debate will result in a no. Unfortunaly no government is going to do this with out evidence of a clear majority of support.

A very huge fan base of Jeremy Clarkson can argue that he should not be called a cunt. So yeah that would fail.

Not even sure the most supportive brexiter would say the same of farage. You only have to look at his smile. And you feel the urge to throw milkshake at it. So yeah.

Its only a defence. If she has no history of diagnosable attacks.

I am no expert on epilepsy . But know young diagnosis is far from exclusive. So it is entirly possible this was her first attack. Or even the first attack she recognised as such. (IE not happening when she was asleep or otherwise unable to identify).

But if she has ever had an event she should suspect makes her unfit to drive. She is required to tell the DVLA and not drive.

But that recognition requirement is hard to define. Drivers are not expected to be medical experts. So in general unless a doc has told her. It would be hard to proove she is aware of any risk.

T1d myself. Diagnosed long before I was able to drive. I now do not drive because my condition is not safe to do so. But was in the situation for almost 30 years. Where I was required to testify my stability to drive every few years. And could be held responsible if I did so falsely.

No. At no point is lackmof evidence proving someone innocent ever acceptable to debate at a trail.

And I the lead up to the trail. It is not something even the defence or prosecution is likely to consider. As neither is able to consider it as argument. Or make decisions on taking the case based on such.

Tory MPs need to revese there rectal cranium insersion. And recognise ethics is not a subject, they have any fucking right to raise atm.

We need to sharply and rapidly stop producing CO2 immediately

Can I recommend a new law requiring billionaires the travel only by trebuchet. May solve more issues then just CO2

Also signed. Now at 126k plus. So debate is to be considered.

Unfortunately it needs the votes to make it a threat to the future of the government. So multiple millions. Before any gov can consider these things to be significant.

100k is about 0.15% of the population. These things are set up to be ignored. 10% is likely the minimum needed to scare a government into action. Assuming no clear evidence of higher numbers opposed to it.

it would be difficult to accept this one without evidence.

Sorta not the point. We are talking about the person being accused. So reasonable doubt is in her defence.

It is down to the prosecution to either prove this is false. Or prove she had reason to know it was unsafe for her to drive.

Now the fun part.

Where the prosecution aregues being a cunt is a legally protected privilege. So telling folks not to be is offensive.

At some point ideally. But how can we protect politicians from this offence. Becomes a major news event.

This could be such an interesting trial.

First the procecution will need to prove that the majority of readers will feel harrased or offended by the word cunt.

So this shuuld lead to a discussion of meaning.

At this ppinr we can hope the defence points out.

Procecuting someone for expressinf a non violent request to be good to humanity. Definatly counts.

A shitty fascist civilisation, is still civilisation. It will end as something close to a fuedal one. Where the billionaires prevent the serfs from doing anything to improve things.

Century is a long time. Those who voted for this crap will not live to suffer.

Many poor nations are suffering today. And will likely collapse into failed states during those voters lifetimes.

So yes there is a difference between rich or poor. As living in the wealthy we get to not make your decendents suffer. These voters forget some are already suffering and are happy to ignore it. As I said wealthy nations will be the last to suffer. And suffer the least.

More then billionaires. But way way less then those the west has stripped of resources and competative ability since the 1800s.

Problem with that is it translates to.

Fuck the poor nations. Let the rich voters fuck um over with climate catastraphies while they close their borders to tefugees.

Wealthy nations have the least to fear.

Might happen vs predicted to happen.

May seem like a small difference. But its really not. It changes possible to probable.

That said. The prediction is based on no changes. So you know full well this is being jumped on by right-wing media that have other reasons for arguing the change.

IE its about rich not wanting to pay the taxes needed to support the future p opulation. So arguing for anti immigration as a cost saving that won’t effect them.

Yeah but that definition of spritual.

Looks to some like a group of potential cult members. That just need conversion.

I always considered the sci-fi def of AI to be the incorrect one. Once sentience appears. The intelligence is no longer artificial.

Seems to me the systems we have now that try to (badly) fake it, are real AI. And any created intelligence would be a Digital Intelligence or even just Created Intelligence.

The trump teams efficency expert. Openly suggested the US overthrow the UKs elected government. To free the UK people.

What the fuck right do they have to question anything representatives of that government says. And why the hell would the UK media feel they deserve any attenbtion.