Source is here: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/survey-results/daily/2025/02/20/c33bd/1

That source allows you to see the results according to political affiliation. Pluralities of supporters of the Conservatives, Labour, and Lib Dems think that supporting Ukraine is more important.

The exception is Reform UK, whose supporters think that good relations with the USA are more important than supporting Ukraine.

  • Rogue@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 hours ago

    What would be the point of sucking up to the current iteration of the US? They’ll stab you in the back regardless.

    It’s a clear time to increase unity with Europe. I don’t mean re-open any EU discussions, simply work with them on united response to Russian aggression.

  • constantreadarr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    I recently read an opinion piece by a GB News writer (masochism I guess) in which he said Keir Starmer was out of touch with UK sentiment for prioritising Ukraine over the US. Now, Sir Keir is a woeful prick of a red tory, but its quite nice to have confirmation that GBeebies are badly misinformed on this topic too.

    • SleafordMod@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Many people will claim that the public is on their side, without providing actual evidence. I guess that’s why polling is important.

      Then you have some people who claim the polls are rigged, but I think it’s more likely that the polls are pretty accurate.

    • aramova@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Came to say the same.

      Half of us think the country shits gold and the world will bend over.

      If you had a family member who behaved like we did, it would be time for an intervention.

      Christ, I’d rather see Boris Johnson as our president than what we have, at least he’s Mr Bean level of political stupid. Ours is just vile hate and greed.

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Johnson would be better but his Mr Bean act is totally on purpose. He acts like that so you wouldn’t think him capable of far right cruelty. I’ve read that he even intentionally messes up his hair before he goes in front of cameras.

        • TheEmpireStrikesDak@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 hours ago

          It’s all part of his cleverly crafted persona. Just like him using his middle name. The average Brit doesn’t know that the real man is Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson, who used to burn £50 notes in front of homeless people for fun.

          Remember this guy wanted to invade the Netherlands.

          This time it’s the US that’s 4 years behind. You have your own Dominic Cummings and everything.

  • slakemoth@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    The Uk is between a rock and hard place geopolitically. It seems that joining the eu is political suicide but aligning economically with the Usa means selling off the nhs.

    I guess the best we can hope for is going our own way and hoping for some economic miracle . Maybe we’ll discover some more north sea oil…

  • Saleh@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why is there a “Neither” option? I mean in practice “Neither” could mean to strike a perfect 50/50 balance. Or it could mean to antagonize both of them. Or it could mean “i don’t really care”. So what makes “Neither” a separate and relevant category to “Don’t know”, which could also mean “i don’t know how to prioritize the two” or “i don’t really care” or “what is an US and is it a newer model or older than the Ukraine?”

    • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Trump is a temporary symptom. The problem is that a third of the US sees his evil bullshit and fucking loves it; another third sees his evil bullshit and remains completely apathetic to it and can’t be bothered to so much as waddle over to their mailbox to submit a ballot in opposition to it; and the remaining third is only given a lesser-evil option that comes with some seriously demotivating baggage like fucking genocide.

      And even if it’s less genocide than the other guy, shit like that is always going to make a major dent in that third’s turnout, paving the way for the situation we’re in now.

      Even if Trump is actively being assassinated as I post this (yo, god: pretty pretty please?) some other evil bigot will fill the vacuum. Now, if he gets assassinated too, we might be on to something: sending the message that being an evil oppressive sack of shit comes with a major mortal liability is the short term fix we absolutely need, but we’ve all seriously underestimated the degree of enthusiastic evil in the average voter.

    • uienia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Trump may be temporary, but the oligarch fascists flocking around him have realised how blatant they can act without facing any repercussions, and they will not relinquish this overt control of political power again, regardless of which president wins.