• cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    It might not be possible to spend this amount of money for one simple reason. Germany has a so called “debt break” which means, that, in theory, Germany isn’t allowed to increase its debt. This is written in the construction, so to change this you need 2/3 of the parliament to agree. Now comes the real problem, our leftist party and the AfD make up over 2/3 of the parliament so it isn’t possible without them and both parties don’t want to increase military spending.

    • Reviever@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is about the Emergency Defense Fund.

      This is unrelated to the “Schuldenbremse”. But still, some are trying to block this.

      The new “Bundestag” won’t be in until 24th March. Until then the old one still has the power. So if they do it before AfD and Linke don’t have that much power.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Are you talking about money though? The German military is in rut for years under Merkel, and the number of German military personnel is quite low. It is France, Poland and UK who have the largest number of active personnel in Europe. What Germany will do is fund them instead.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      History, for Germany or the rest of us, is not cyclical. I wish those in charge of America understood that.

      I for one want Germany armed to the teeth

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Reported for misinformation, they patched that exploit. Now you have to manually justify wars before having your civil war to form the “totally democratic” EU in 1938, like some kind of Italian.