The downside of everything being federated is that it’s really easy to listen in. Make sure to keep yourself anonymous online!

  • dumbass@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Pretty sure hexbear was one, the original admin bailed as soon as Trump got elected and they were really big on the don’t vote trend.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    There are also instances that most likely exist just to suck up data for AI/LLM training. People were up in arms about it happening on Reddit and trying to torch their comments when here they’re giving it away for free and there are less bots because it’s a newer platform.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    I use NoScript and uBlock. For this page, there are eighteen different scripts that want to run, but I only allow the two that seem necessary for basic functionality.

    Apart from using Tor and allowing zero scripts to run, we have little hope of even pseudo-anonymity on the internet, and increasingly in our every-day lives.

    We, as a people, tolerate the surveillance state as long as they increase the surveillance incrementally over generations, distract us with shiny toys, and keep us fighting amongst ourselves over irrelevant subjects.

    • madame_gaymes@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Just know that various governments have been confirmed to be running their own Tor nodes and monitoring traffic. To the point where they can de-anonymize some stuff in the right conditions.

      https://medium.com/@paradigmintelligence/a-brief-history-of-government-surveillance-targeting-tor-5def5298aa7d

      Then you have the whole KAX17 thing.

      https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/2021/12/was-threat-actor-kax17-de-anonymizing-the-tor-network

      All this to say, take extra precautions and don’t get complacent just 'cause you’re using Tor. It’s kinda like how most car accidents happen within a mile of your home, because you’ve driven it so many times you some times check out and go into auto-pilot. Some people assume Tor is the end-all, and it is not unfortunately.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        What else are you going to use? Also Tor is highly resistant to attacks and it is very hard to trace traffic even if you control a sizable amount of the network. I think using Tor for random stuff once and a while is good as it mixes in junk with sensitive stuff.

        I think the actual risk for a single low priority individual is low. However, run a node of you can. Also install the snowflake extension

        • madame_gaymes@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          I didn’t say don’t use it, I am just making a note for those that don’t know Tor and expect it to be the 1 tool to rule them it all.

          Yes, some of the attacks I mentioned have been mitigated, but that’s no reason to assume it is 100% foolproof. Clearly, it wasn’t before.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            The browser is much weaker than the network itself. Stay up to date with security patches and run Tor in a live environment like Tails OS

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        That attack type is mitigated both through protocol updates and network management.

        It hasn’t been a problem for several years.

        That isn’t to say that you should trust TOR completely, just that you don’t have to worry about sybil attacks on the network.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Im not scared. Ill lay it all out. im Hubert Manne. Thats H-U-B-E-R-T and I live at 1397 Prince Ave, Athens, GA 30606. My ssn is 123-45-6789. Are you bro enough, to come at me?

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Probably, there are also bots on lemmy already bcz it’s grown quite a bit. They are definitely trying to direct the conversation as well.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    If you are doing anything that’s publicly visible, you’re not anonymous.

  • jqubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I don’t think they really need to run an instance to conduct surveillance on the Fediverse. Maybe it makes things easier, but a lot of this is public anyway. Just because Google isn’t putting a lot of this in search results yet doesn’t mean it can’t be scraped by people who are interested in scraping it.

    • LostXOR@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yeah but the traffic from scraping other instances is going to get noticed real quickly, whereas a small instance federating with everyone else isn’t really suspicious.

      • towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Doesn’t even have to be an instance.
        Custom code that runs the pubsub protocol… Without publishing anything.
        Everything is open.
        Unless instance admins find the pubsub instance suspicious and defederate it, at which point it won’t be able to receive posts/comments

    • delusion@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      Svenska
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Running free instances is a) way easier if you’re a government, and b) gives you important moderation control.

      Also, a government running an instance that allows and promotes material that is very critical of said government could very well happen. It might sound contradictory, but allows for future control over “problematic” movements, if the need ever occurs.

  • 74 183.84@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Thats why you make an account with no info attached to you. And run a vpn. Not fool proof, but better than nothing

    • Maiq@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Remember to avoid the ask lemmy posts like:

      Whats your favorite pets name, what street did you grow up on, do you like cut or uncut, etc…

      • 74 183.84@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Depends on my mood. Ive never had uncut but am curious. I’m half cut (shaft-wise direction)

    • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Something like Tor, and a proper education in keeping identities compartmentalized would be more appropriate for a use-case where someone is trying to maintain anonymity. VPN is mostly only good for a bit of wifi security and piracy.

      • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        IP address won’t report back to your home country, reputable VPN providers will fight to protect your anonymity because they know once they accommodate law enforcement their business will tank.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    I consider Lemmy to be more pseudonymous. Which is to say, I am practically anonymous to most users, but it wouldn’t take much for someone with resources to pester my instance into giving up my IP.

    The content of my posts, comments, and votes is intentionally public information.

    • LostXOR@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yeah that’s true; real anonymity would be something like 4chan where users aren’t distinguishable. Here you can tell who people are, but not necessarily find out their real life identity.