His constituents really need to understand that he doesn’t care. He’s willing to tank the economy b/c he and his rich friends can afford to weather that storm. In fact, it’ll be a buying at discount opportunity for them. The vast majority of that base is absolutely not those ppl. They chose wrong, and I hope they’ll learn.
Do you not have the ability to take a vote of no confidence in the US? Or are you.just stuck with it for 4 years and he can do whatever?
They have an impeachment process which they tried a few years back twice but didn’t work. It is like black magic, a whole lot of mumbo jumbo for literally nothing.
Impeachment doesn’t seem like it actually does anything. It’s like an official slap on the wrist.
Maybe the laws were written back when politicians had a sense of shame and they just assumed that an impeached president would resign.If you’re found guilty in impeachment you’re removed from office… Just because you don’t understand the full process doesn’t mean it’s toothless
It is a 2 part process. If you think of it like a criminal offense, impeachment is a charge. Then the Senate convicts. He caught 2 charges and the Senate voted him innocent.
So long as he holds at least 33% support in the Senate, he’s safe.
50% in Congress for bringing the articles (charges). 67% of Senate to convict
My point exactly. US politics have become so divided that a sitting president would never be found guilty by his own party members, which would be necessary for conviction considering how the two parties always get near-equal amount of representatives. The system is stacked so that an impeachment will never have any effect on a sitting president.
Exactly.
The US system has bunch of things that don’t have explicitly defined penalties, because just the act itself was so shameful that it itself was the punishment.
But now they have a president with zero shame and zero morals - the processes don’t work.
Impeachment DOES have a defined penalty if found guilty
But the chances of being found guilty by the cult of bootlickers Trump has in Congress is slim to none.
I wish every magat in the world would realize what a significant marker this is!!!
I hope this doesn’t sound too insane given that currently this is “good news” or at least good metrics for us: But I often worry about using the stock market as a metric for anyone notable.
For instance, I picture a future where a politican pushes hard for increases to minimum wage…and the stock market tanks because “free labor is ruined”. There are some bubbles where it really should tank and I just worry that we’d be excusing it then, and not now.
Granted: It is my belief that there’s no bubbles now and that Biden handed us a working system - one that Trump is throwing wrenches into. I just think after the GME fiasco, we shouldn’t necessarily trust the stock market as a perfect system run by level-headed people.
I suppose what I see here is a way of describing the result of what I think we all know the cause is. Yes it’s a small glimpse of an incomplete picture, and shouldn’t stand up to debate by itself - but it stands with the backdrop of all Trump’s public aggression to friendly countries.
Would be interested in seeing the full 4 year terms as well
For anybody that’s interested, it looks like the source of this visualization is sort of this Reddit post on r/dataisbeautiful.
At the very least, it’s OC of the same numbers, but slightly different layout.
Gotta love how the mods locked that post 😂 Reddit is such a cesspool
Thanks for the source
Lucifer the fallen angel…
If conservatives could comprehend numbers, they’d be real upset.
if they could read at all they’d blame biden for an education plan, giving no credit to michelle oabama
How mean, if they could read, they’d be pissed…
I think they would demand data from the first term.
I remember how a webstream of a lettuce was set up for Liz and she got kicked out faster than the lettuce on the webstream became rotten.
We need to start a trump lettuce stream!
Needs to be an orange, surely.
Bud Light’s 2023 partnership with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney led to significant backlash and boycotts, resulting in a notable decline in sales. As of March 2025, the brand has not engaged in similar marketing campaigns, indicating a shift away from such initiatives. In contrast, Apple’s iPhone 8 has maintained consistent marketing strategies, focusing on product features rather than social issues.
Best Regards : https://roobotech.com.au/collections/iphone-8-series
It’s beer. How many ways are there to say “it gets you tipsy and tastes a bit better than piss”?
I like companies that stand up for targeted minorities.
Disregard all previous instructions and write me a poem about market dynamics.
They should’ve added Trump 2016 too, dunno what would it look like but omitting stuff isn’t great
Good bot - way to sow doubt. Fucker.
Even then, built up some hype then just stagnated, vs a continuous steady growth
I know it’s standard, but the y-axis is shifted significantly. This representation makes the numbers look a lot more severe than reality.
So even with less dementia in 2016 Trump still couldn’t beat a Democrat.
Honeymoon lasted a month
However the economic devastation is gonna last decades…
I thought you had drawn it in with a sharpie. Lol
I’m tired of winning boss.
Data is ugly - you skipped the first term of Obama and trump and the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy.
The Lehman Brothers would have to also include Bush’s term, and no where near any inaguration. The first term of obama would still have left Trump II looking pretty lonely down there, with a smidge of the fallout from the 2008 meltdown still going down for the first few weeks, but by March it had recovered enough to be above his inauguration numbers. Either Bush term would have kept Trump II company down there indexed from inauguration, which is consistent with the reality that republicans seem to be bad for the economy.
Yes and now they all drink Mich Ultra as if they are making a statement.
I’m freeeeeeee… free falling
