• Therobohour@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    58 minutes ago

    That’s 0% surprising. FB had always been about making girls feel bad. It’s in its sorce code

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Goddam I had to read that headline 3 times before I understood the implication!
    That is outright disgusting, and such practices ought to be outlawed.
    Or as Trump would say, very cool and very legal way to make money.

  • Epzillon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Happy I got AdNauseam after uBlock Origin. Deleted my facebook a year ago, shit is an AI slopfest built upon the greed and manipulation of every part of the chain. Defcon 31 has a good talk that brings this up. “Disenshittify or die” by Cory Doctrow, cann recommend to watch.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I support the use of AdNauseam. Not sure if there are any more extreme alternatives, I now choose to be actively hostile towards advertising/tracking rather than just passively blocking it.

  • hopesdead@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    This type of advertising isn’t new. There is that famous (although the claims from the father have been questioned) New York Times article written by Charles Duhigg in 2012. A father of a teenage girl in Minnesota got upset for receiving coupons from Target for infant care related products. As the story goes, he later learned his daughter was in fact pregnant. It turns out Target was using some predictive algorithm to identify would-be mothers and straight up sending them coupons for infant care products. It seems ever since this article was published that they stopped doing this in such a direct manner. Again, there have people who questioned the validity of the claims for this specific story, but Target did confirm they were doing this.

    • El_Scapacabra@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      My doctor’s office (allegedly) handed my info to a plastic surgery clinic so they could send me a “happy 40th birthday, now fix your sagging bullshit!”-email the literal day I turned 40.

      Needless to say that put a damper on things.

      People have been doing evil shit for money since the invention of money. These days it’s just automated.

      • nomy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        37 minutes ago

        I’d call my former Dr’s office and flip my shit. Them giving out your info may have been a HIPAA violation. You should really follow up and harass the fuck out of them.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I think I read somewhere that that was apocryphal, but it strikes me as 100% plausible. It doesn’t even have to be a matter of “write a system that detects pregnant women via their purchase history and send them coupons for maternity stuff” I think Amazon’s Frequently Bought Together feature could get it done. The same algorithm that suggests a tacklebox and some lures when you have a fishing pole in your shopping cart might recommend diapers and formula to those who buy maternity pants.

      • vegetvs@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 hour ago

        That’s a fallacy. Teenagers are the victims here. So I’m obviously blaming greedy corporations, lack of good parenting and proper regulation from authorities.

    • Someone8765210932@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Ok, but the genie is already out of the bottle. Arguing like this is kinda pointless.

      I don’t think it will be possible to get them off social media (or the internet in general), so you need to find ways to make it work.

      E.g. minors can not be advertised to, no algorithmic content, no doom-scrolling, and heightened data protection. I think teenager should get access to as much as possible to reduce the “risk” of them trying to go around it. “Their” version of social media might even be the superior one in the end.

      If the world wasn’t on fire at the moment, people could calmly discuss possible solutions and propose laws in every country to actually protect their children from e.g. the stuff mentioned in the linked article. Sadly, this isn’t going to happen …

      • theblips@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        58 minutes ago

        How isn’t it possible? Just don’t give them phones, it’s not that complicated

        • brandon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          32 minutes ago

          You can walk into any Walmart in America and buy a cheap smartphone for $30.

          This approach is even less effective than “just don’t give them drugs”.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            19 minutes ago

            Ok, but you also need a data plan to go along w/ it (or regular visits to top up; is that still a thing?), plus hide it from parents, or you’re going to have a bad time.

            Drugs are a different story. You can often get drugs from friends (free to start), can buy them a little at a time, and you don’t need to stash any at home. For a phone to be useful, it needs to be readily accessible, which means you’ll have it with you everywhere.

            It’s possible, but it’s going to take a fair amount of work to hide a phone from a parent who’s paying even a little bit of attention.

            The real problem here is parents. Parents need to step up and do a better job. Source: am a parent.

      • andallthat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        The thing is that social media have an oversized influence that makes a calm discussion of possible solutions very hard to have. When the US recognized the implications of letting a foreign power exert so much control over their people, they tried banning TikTok, or breaking it up so their US operation would be under US control.

        Facebook should also be split and its EU operation purchased by a European company, that could then spend more time implementing the other changes you mention (doom-scrolling, data protection) and less time lobbying to get all these pesky EU regulations removed.

        And yes, it does feel heartbreaking to count the US as a threat to national security, but China has never threatened to annex Greenland with military force, so what would have been paranoia and extreme anti-americanism last year is now the sensible, level-headed thing to do.

    • andallthat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Not just teenagers. Facebook and quite a few others should outright be banned. Not only they are scientifically proven to be a mental health catastrophe and a political threat to democracy, it’s also pretty clear now that both these things are part of their design, not bugs or unintended emerging properties.

      • ToastedRavioli@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        51 minutes ago

        Facebook actively contributed to the genocide in Myanmar, and did basically nothing about it because they didnt want to hire more moderators that spoke the language, so that they could adequately remove pro-genocidal content

  • Grimtuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Be aware that the companies would have paid Facebook handsomely to identify users in this way. The world we live in has a sickness with greed for money at its heart.

  • admin@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    How did they come up with this idea? Did the algorithm suggest this pattern, or did someone in marketing come up with it?

      • chellomere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Translation of article from behind paywall: The Facebook CEO’s enormous yacht has been anchored in a Norwegian fjord near the Swedish border.

        Now DN can reveal that several Sami villages have been offered compensation for not saying no to a “prominent person” going on a luxury helicopter skiing trip in the mountains.

        • They wanted to buy our silence, says a representative of a Sami village.

        At least three villages were contacted in March by a company that arranges helicopter skiing trips. The Sami villages have been offered compensation, ahead of a very secret group of tourists arriving to ski in the Swedish mountains in April. A Norwegian village team has also received a similar offer.

        • We understood that it was something special. The organizers were very keen for us to say yes, even though this is before the calving season when the ewes are pregnant and all the reindeer are very fragile after a tough winter, says a representative of a Sami village.

        Helicopter skiing in untouched lands, known as heliskiing, has been criticized by reindeer owners for destroying nature and disturbing the reindeer – and the issue has been raised by the Norrbotten County Administrative Board to the government.

        According to sources from several Sami villages, the plans for this particular April visit were somewhat out of the ordinary.

        The Sami villages, which use helicopters in their reindeer husbandry, were offered six hours of helicopter use by the organizer – which corresponds to around 50,000 kronor.

        On April 1, one of the largest private luxury yachts in existence arrived in Bodö, Norway – something that caused a stir in the Norwegian media.

        It is owned by Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of the Facebook company Meta, who is one of the richest people in the world. He is one of the billionaires who has tried to approach US President Donald Trump by, among other things, donating money.

  • faltryka@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    At some point we need to start criminalizing shit like this and actually holding people accountable.

    • venusaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s so much bigger than this. It starts young. iPad kids. Strict gender roles. Sexualization of children. Learning from parents who have been conditioned by capitalism, sexism and more. We got little girls that want skincare products and teens talking about plastic surgery. It’s bad.

      Agreed though. Punish people for ruining society. I think I read a while ago that France had required social media posts to flag when images have been altered. We need more laws like this too.

      • hopesdead@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Sexualization of children.

        I hate to say it, but something is changing the physicality of age groups. At least I think that is what is happening. I swear there are teenagers today who look like adults in their 20s and young adults who don’t look over 18. I get scared seeing a conventionally attractive person (by stereotypical standards), wondering if I’m being a creep because I can’t identify their age group. Hell, I work among some people who easily can be mistaken for being under 18. Thankfully I know the company has a hiring minimum of 18.

        EDIT: My point, that I should have stated, was if you surveyed a random sampling of a American suburban neighborhood, it might not be easy to identify age groups anymore.

        • JacksonLamb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 hours ago

          It has always been this way. When you get old, 15 year olds and 19 year olds start to all look the same.

          Similarly, to teenagers a 40 year old and a 60 year old look the same. Old.

        • venusaur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 hours ago

          It’s hard to say if it’s one of those things that older gens say is different with newer gens even though it the same. I will say though, the convergence of sexualization of children and infantilization of adults have been narrowing the gap and maybe one is winning over the other.

      • ABCDE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 hours ago

        And mass sharing of images/videos which has made it so much easier to connect people, specifically in one case I saw today of someone on Telegram sharing child porn. How do you even put the cat back in the box?

      • Little8Lost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 hours ago

        As little kids we got like no genderbased education from our parents. When we moved our grandmother got a lot more control and dumped blue boyish stuff on my brother and forbid the girly things. Has never worn a dress since and now is still not willing to wear one

        (it could be that us older sisters influenced that he wants to wear dresses too)

        • venusaur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Bummer. Happens to almost all men in the US. Maybe less now, but this new red pill generation is wild.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I need context to understand your story. How old was your brother when you moved? How often was he wearing dresses before the move? How quickly did it stop? And how old is he now?

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Oh you mean fines? Sure here’s some money $$. Meanwhile AD rev is $$$$$. Just the cost of doing business! Hahahaa

      • thejml@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Thus far, they’d basically be right. Any fines are simply chocked up to “cost of doing business” expenses and since no one wants to either make solid laws against this stuff OR hold them accountable for current ones, they’ll just keep at it.

          • stoy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 hours ago

            That depends on if it is a dayfine or not.

            A fine of €500 for speeding will only really affect poor people, 30 dayfines which value is dictated by the wealth of the individual is a better system.