You sit down to relax, put on your favorite show, and settle in for a night of binge-watching. But while you’re watching your TV… your TV is watching you.

Smart TVs take constant snapshots of everything you watch. Sometimes hundreds of snapshots a second.

Welcome to the future of “entertainment.”

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    At this point I’m just going to assume George Orwell was a time traveler. He’s been right about everything so far.

  • shiroininja@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    So does your isp, and uses that for targeted ads. My pihole is constantly blocking a domain ran by xfinity that collects data for their targeted ad service

  • FG_3479@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    The built-in OS on smart TVs almost always sucks. The built-in OS on our LG is slower, has less apps, and has less support for HDR and higher resolutions than our Fire stick.

    Just don’t use it and instead plug in a Fire stick, turn off its tracking, then sideload apps like BeeTV and HDO Box.

    I know Amazon has a bad rep from a privacy standpoint but the Fire stick is super cheap compared to its competition and lets you turn off the tracking in one page of the settings menu.

    • hootmcgoot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      The article says the TVs still capture input and do recognition from external sources so using an external device is not helping.

      Edit: Unless your tv is not connected to the internet.

      • orb360@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        The TV can still connect via weave, Amazon sidewalk, or other mesh networks through your neighbors doorbell or thermostat or whatever… Even if you never connect it, it could still report. Have to open it up and destroy the antennas.

  • aceshigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I just don’t own a tv. Getting rid of my entertainment and gaming systems and most of social media was my answer to internal peace. I don’t have streaming either.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Sometimes hundreds of snapshots a second.

    That’s a pretty neat FPS for a tv.

    • beveradb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yeah I’m calling bullshit on that quote, I’d like to see proof of any smart TV having beefy enough hardware to record anything at 100fps+, and even then what would be the point? Nothing played back on the screen will even have a frame rate and 60fps… I’m sure this is a lazy article mistake

      • Breezy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        If they were recording so much couldnt tv makers be held liable for recording another companies property.

    • Camelbeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      The article states that’s what the privacy policy sais samsung can sample every 500ms and LG every 10ms. It doesn’t really mean they are, but it’s definitely possible. A very basic way of detecting content is to take a 1000 pixels evenly spaced out over the screen and store the color values. That gives you something you can match against a database. You don’t need to process a 4K screenshot for this.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    No it’s not.

    Still got an old Panasonic plasma from 2010 and it’s going strong.

    But I am aware of the “wonders” of post-purchase monetization, which is how they’re printing out so many of these cutting edge OLED big screens for surprisingly low initial purchase prices

  • acchariya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Just create a black hole network at your house and connect all ‘smart’ appliances to that. Block all traffic at the router level. This prevents them trying to connect to open mesh networks and also provides the benefit of cataloging all the traffic

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I’ve never allowed my TV to have an active route to the internet since I bought it in 2019, it’s exclusively fed over HDMI by gaming consoles and an Apple TV.

    The thing is, HDMI 1.4 added HEC, so what’s to prevent media players from serving as an Ethernet switch and providing an internet connection to TVs.

    • TFO Winder@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      HEC feature enables IP-based applications over HDMI and provides a bidirectional Ethernet communication at 100 Mbit/s

      I think the bandwidth is too slow for HD/4K Streams.

      I am sure the 100 Mbit/s must also be theoretical maximum, i would be impressed if practical cables supports even half the orignal specs

  • atlien51@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    What 4K TV can I buy that doesn’t do this guys help? Or should I stick to monitors???