Today, Congressman Shri Thanedar (MI-13) introduced articles of impeachment against Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, citing a sweeping abuse of power, flagrant violations of the Constitution, and acts of tyranny that undermine American democracy and threaten the rule of law.

“Donald Trump has repeatedly demonstrated that he is unfit to serve as President and represents a clear and present danger to our nation’s constitution and our democracy,” said Rep. Thanedar. “His unlawful actions have subverted the justice system, violated the separation of powers, and placed personal power and self-interest above public service. We cannot wait for more damage to be done. Congress must act.”

The resolution includes seven articles of impeachment outlining a range of constitutional violations.

  • Kacarott@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Can someone ELI5 what impeachment even achieves, and why it seemed to do nothing last time? Is it just a badge of dishonour?

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      An impeachment conviction results in removal from office. The previous impeachment proceedings did not result in a conviction.

    • j0ester@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It really makes no sense. Even if you succeed an impeachment, you can just get re-elected next term - as long as you didn’t use your two terms.

      • rekabis@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        as long as you didn’t use your two terms.

        And even this is looking increasingly irrelevant. Trump has another 3¾ years to ensure nothing is in his way for a 3rd, 4th, or even more terms. And with Republicans working to ensure a permanent Republican ascendancy, even voting will become a performative act; a thin veneer of legitimacy papering over useless theatrics and a predetermined outcome.

          • rekabis@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            They will fail.

            Like all the other things they have “failed at” with almost zero consequences? Like ignoring judicial orders and deporting American citizens and dismantling the government and shredding the constitution and all that other anti-democratic crap?

            Sure, buddy. And I have some premium sand for you to bury your head into.

    • Washedupcynic@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Impeachment is a formal process used to formally accuse a public official, including the president, of misconduct while in office. It’s a legislative action, not a court trial, and is the first step in the process of potentially removing the official from office and disqualifying them from holding future office. The House of Representatives initiates impeachment proceedings by drafting and voting on “articles of impeachment,” which are essentially charges of misconduct. If enough people in the house vote to impeach, they kick it over to the senate to have a trial. It takes 2/3 or 66% of the senate to convict before he can be removed from office. The last 2 times the house was able to vote on the articles of impeachment. When it got kicked to the senate the last 2 times, there weren’t enough votes to convict. This is because republican senators were more interested in protecting the republican party than they were the country. Most of us would rather lawfully remove Trump from office. The constitution is still important and many of us still believe in it. Even if it’s not successful, it still has a purpose. The people that vote no on impeachment are going on public record to aid an abet his crimes, potentially opening themselves up to legal consequences once trump is gone. Also, exhausting all avenues of the law makes civil disobedience more legitimate should things get bad enough to come to that.

    • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you want to just lay there and keep watching our country burn while doing nothing that’s your choice. I’ll keep doing what little I can to help those who are working on fighting this tyrant.

      • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You haven’t gotten it yet, huh?

        Congress is powerless. The Judicial is powerless.

        This will do nothing but knock yourselves out, I’ve seen this show before.

        • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          As much as I hate it, I agree.
          We all saw how far those two impeachments he got before went.

        • hikeandbike@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          imo, we have to fight on all fronts. While some may argue that it’s a waste of time, I believe the work for short term reform is still important. Even if the long-term goal is something more. While I hold a more revolutionary ideology, I’ve comrades who are doing what they can in the existing system.

        • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Why not both? The amount of time and effort required for me to support a likely unsuccessful impeachment attempt is negligible, but it does make me feel just a smidge better.

  • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Good. Now everyone needs to call, email, or visit with their reps to get this passed - assuming they can force a vote. It will only take 4 republicans crossing the aisle in the house to impeach him yet again. Then we need to hound our Senators to get a conviction. That will be the hardest part because it’ll take about 20 republicans to join all the democrats and independents to convict him.

  • Absaroka@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Good. They should keep doing this for everything he does illegally.

    Even if it won’t amount to anything, we’re getting Republicans on the record as saying they support Trump.

    Makes it tough for the inevitable “I didn’t side with Trump” statements we’ll hear when he is finally gone.

  • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s a waste for a D to bring Impeachment charges. Unless Rs do it, it will never pass and will always seem politically motivated.

    • Spezi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Even if a republican would do this, the Magats would claim it’s a secret democrat.

      • Bristingr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Weird how they only did it today when a primary challenger announced they were running.

        They could have done this anytime before today but waited until their seat was at stake.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Just pure coincidence that they drafted this up on the same day. Almost like they know people aren’t interested in a politician who doesn’t represent them.

          Wanna take bets that the challenger loses and the impeachment goes nowhere, so nothing happens to this seat?

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        My house is on fire, but I’m standing on the sidewalk spitting at it. At least I’m “actually trying to do something”, right?

    • squozenode@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Of course it’s politically motivated, trump is a shit political leader.

      He’s done exactly 2 things I agree with, kill the useless penny, and say he’ll pass a “congress can’t trade stocks” law.

    • Zenith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I think every single D should do it, all of them should have ALREADY condemned his high crimes. They’re cowards

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Gotta start removing more Republicans from power, too. Use that 14th amendment to clear most of them out.

    • Kyrrrr@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      What does it waste? Every Republican, moderate, and undecided gets to see who actually wants impeachment. No stepping around it we’ll know who could have ended this and voted to keep him. what can a Democrat do that isn’t going to look politically motivated? Defeatist arguments are exactly what trump needs to become emperor

      • Bristingr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Johnson can just table it without a vote. You’re not gonna get anyone on record with it.

      • SlyLycan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Rather than shame someone who is changing, maybe encourage it. It’s easier to get people on board the train if people are friendly rather than passing negative judgment.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The totally free, and ad free, app called “5 Calls” will help you with that. It provides you their phone number, and a script. You can setup reminders to call daily, weekly, or I suppose monthly.

      • Psythik@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Won’t they catch on that you’re just reading from a script if enough people are using this app, and thus calling in and saying the same thing over and over again?

        • Flames5123@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The fact that people are calling is what matters. It doesn’t matter if they are following a script. It’s a person that is taking their time to call in support/opposition to something.

          • Sinthesis@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            ^This. If you make the effort to call, you are very likely to vote in the next election. You won’t be able to talk to your representative directly but the aides will relay the volume of calls coming in to them.

            • Raltoid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yeah representatives don’t rerally care if they get a thousand emails an hour 24/7, because that’s easy to do with bots. But if they have to constantly ignore calls or temporarily hire more people to handle the volume, they’ll take note. At least the better ones.

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The immunity regarding official acts pertains to judicial proceedings. An impeachment is a legislative proceeding. While it uses judicial terms like “trial” it is not the same thing and can not directly result in criminal conviction or sentencing.

  • Wren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hasn’t this happened already? I could swear I’ve seen another article or two a while back saying someone was doing this same thing.