• Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Hot air balloon pilot here: We do, indeed.

      This is a “Cloudhopper”. It’s a hot air balloon with no basket: The pilot straps a propane tank to his back and wears a climbing harness. As you can see, the pilot is, effectively, walking on water with the assistance of the balloon.

      Cloudhoppers are about 20,000 to 35,000 cubic feet, 40-50 feet in diameter. They are about 1/3 to 1/2 the size of most of the balloons you might see at a fair or festival.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Absolutely, but the scale of the balloons is a bit off. Nobody would be walking shoulder to shoulder like this. For a normal-ish 170lb/77kg individual your personal balloon would have to be a little under 6.5 meters across assuming it were filled with helium.

      Yes, I did the math.

      • afronaut@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        What if the balloons were long and vertical like the ones in Dune? That could allow them to walk closer to one another.

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I addressed that in another comment here. The long and short of it (very long, as it happens) is that the volume you’d need is still the same. So your elongated balloon would have to be well beyond what most people would consider to be ridiculously tall. 325.5 meters tall, in fact, given the 0.75 meter diameter I assumed to start with. I figure most people could probably stand in a 0.75m circle provided they didn’t wave their arms around a bunch.

      • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Ok but hear me out

        One really BIG balloon with rope systems you could hook on to so multiple people could walk around under the same balloon area.

        • BootyBuccaneer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Revolutionary. I hear hot air is really good for inflating things. I wonder if you could use some sort of flame thrower to keep the balloon afloat.

        • Hoimo@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          If everyone is connected to the same balloon anyway, you could even do without the balloon and build a structure over the water to hang your ropes from.

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        You could use hydrogen, which is less dense than helium. Then if it catches on fire like the Hindenburg you’d already be in the water.

        • perestroika@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          It wouldn’t help. The thing that gives you lift is the mass of displaced air. Difference from the (lack of) mass of the lifting gas is minimal.

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            It would, but less than the density difference, since you’ve removed weight from the balloon thus gravity has less of a pull on the balloon. My wife (a PE in thermodynamics) was the one that verified that comment before I posted it, hence why I didn’t say it would increase lift by the difference in density.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        You did the basic math, with your spherical balloon. What about giant cylinders? Then you could really pack it in.

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Sure. You could do a cylinder of three quarters of a meter across which seems like a reasonable footprint for someone to stand in. That’d only have to be, uh, 325.5 meters tall to have the same volume.

            • ReanuKeeves@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Your asshole “buddy” constantly throwing sharp objects at your balloon causing you to be wet all the time and laughing as you ask your mom if she can mend your massive cylinder for the 13th time this month

              • MrPistachios@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                I’ll just compress more helium and make the balloon metal so its stronger and holds more in a smaller space

                • sushibowl@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I think holding more helium in a smaller space is the opposite of what you want. The lifting force is equal to the weight of the air being displaced, so you want as little stuff as possible in as big a volume as possible.

                  Maybe if you went the other way round and compressed the atmosphere?

                • ReanuKeeves@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Your buddy has figured out that all they need to do is snip the ropes on your cylinder which will make it fly away and now you gotta ask your mom to buy you a new cylinder until your whole family is broke and homeless

        • You could use spherical balloons with really long, but different length, strings for each person. Of course you’d have to avoid tangling your balloons together while walking around like that and given wind can vary with elevation…

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          This I am fairly certain we do not have the technology to achieve. Anything vacuum filled that large would need to have walls so thick so as to completely negate any buoyancy effect. I don’t know of any modern material that would simultaneously be rigid, strong, and light enough.

          • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Cool sci-fi concept tho

            What other sorts of random issues would be solved by this super material :opens notepad: I mean, everything, right? It would have to be so strong, so light and so economical. You could make actual BattleMechs from it that wouldn’t just sink into every surface they walk on. Shit, Dyson Spheres I guess.

            …so why would we use weird balloon floaties? Isn’t it fun how technology answers it’s own questions?

      • Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Note that you wouldn’t need 77 kg worth of bouyancy from the balloon. The shoes would provide some lift, more if you made them out of some type of foam.

    • Suburbanl3g3nd@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      There’s an episode of Nathan For You where he uses giant balloons to help someone who weighed too much to ride a horse normally. Great show

  • YoiksAndAway@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    There are two people water-walking without balloons behind the two women on the left. Time travelers? Aliens? The JFK assassins? We deserve the truth!

  • MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I love that the balloons are far too small. Like they didn’t understand the elements and buoyancy well enough to know the balloons have to be much larger. Not like we have negative mass particles.

          • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Well, air weighs a little bit more than 1 kilogram per cubic meter, and those balloons look a little bit smaller than a cubic meter

            • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              What about hydrogen plasma as hot as the surface of the sun, contained in a weightless force field? The 'balloon is simply a decorative wrapper? Remember, it’s the future year 2025!

    • sroos@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Well, I guess they figured it’d take another 100 years to calculate that correctly, so they just winged it for the picture.

    • wizzor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Obviously they were assuming balloons were filled with supervacuum. We have had 100 years and not invented even that.

      Truly we have failed our ancestors.

    • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m pretty sure scientists back then could have told you that these balloons are too small. The person(s) who drew that picture most likely wasn’t a scientist, which is why it looks how it looks.

  • nectar45@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I actually went to that timeline! And its more complex than you think because well yes, there technology is far cooler and more whimsical, abd yes there world is more socialistic, has more free time, better prices and less of a late stage capitalism nightmare…

    But you should just see how many racial slurs those people used just this morning and half of those women cant vote and have polio.

    Also I am pretty sure left-handed people got hunted to extinction for some reason

    Timeline hopping is a mixed bag

        • nectar45@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah I will NOT be staying here, the fallout-like timeline was better which is saying something

      • nectar45@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Well I went to a timeline where Reddit managed to organize a nuclear attack against Russia and it backfired HARD, a timeline where we never moved on from the 90s which sounds awesome and it was but the uncriticized ultra-consumption of those times eventually laid waste to the world, a world where JK Rowling succeded at making TERFs the mainstream feminism wave, a timeline where X is the ONLY major website left in the world and its as awful as it sounds, a timeline where being a CIS man was illegal, a timeline where Musk is president, a timeline where pernanently horny sentient sex-robots rule over humanity and a timeline where the soviet union defeated the United States during the cold war so “President” Putin is the most powerful man in the world.

        So yeah…I think there is a problem with my dimensional hopper, it only sends me to “dark” timelines

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      And you don’t have an issue with the carriage, with three people on it, where the only balloon is on the horse?

      Whoever made this was an artist and sucked at physics

      • Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The carriage could be on a barge and is just being pulled by the horse. How is the horse getting traction? And why is that man using a cane on water! The small balloons could just be artistic license for the drawing.

    • angrystego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I’d be ok with splashing. I want this!

      Edit: Perhaps the shoes have keels or fins at the bottom and they use a skating-like motion to move around.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      They’re on a carriage that’s like pontooned at the bottom, being pulled by the horse and driver who each have their own balloons.

      edit oh wait d’you mean the ones in the back right my bad dk about them

      • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Back right?

        I see two in the back left and two more in the back middle without balloons. The two in the back right are the carriage passengers.