In a universe that continues to baffle even the sharpest minds, new observations from the James Webb Space Telescope are stirring deep scientific unease. Astronomers have ... Continue Reading →

…there are two different ways to measure this cosmic expansion rate, and they don’t agree. One method looks deep into the past by analyzing cosmic microwave background radiation, the faint afterglow of the Big Bang. The other studies Cepheid variable stars in nearby galaxies, whose brightness allows astronomers to map more recent expansion.

You’d expect both methods to give the same answer. Instead, they disagree—by a lot. And this mismatch is what scientists call the Hubble tension…Webb’s data agrees with Hubble’s and completely rules out measurement error as the cause of the discrepancy. It’s now harder than ever to explain away the tension as a statistical fluke. This inconsistency suggests something big might be missing from our understanding of the universe - something beyond current theories involving dark matter, dark energy, or even gravity itself. When the same universe appears to expand at different rates depending on how and where you look, it raises the possibility that our entire cosmological model may need rethinking.

  • kingofras@lemmy.world
    0·
    3 months ago

    I’m with the aboriginals. We’re just an overdeveloped ant hive on a floating rock who accidentally found oil for a brief period. I think what’s over the horizon is meant to be there. Why would a species who barely ever watch the stars anymore, deserve to know what secrets they hold?

    Sorry for the off topic rant, it’s one of those cold evenings

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      0·
      3 months ago

      Why would a species who barely ever watch the stars anymore

      This article is literally about the star-watching done with the enormous telescope that we built and sent to space specifically so that we could watch the stars better

      • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
        0·
        3 months ago

        Me looking at this comments section wondering why people are arguing science vs middle school slam poetry again. Just let people be overly dramatic about stars it’s a time-honored human tradition and not worth arguing about on the internet.

        Rupaul raises her opera glasses to inspect the foolishness

        • Skua@kbin.earth
          0·
          3 months ago

          Hey, this is me being dramatic about stars. I’m just doing it in the opposite direction because I think it’s amazing that so many people solved so many problems solely because we looked up and wanted to understand

  • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    0·
    3 months ago

    Cool.

    Also, what do folks use to block ads on mobile. I’ve been using FF with Ublock Origin, but lately it hasn’t been cutting it.

    • tabris@lemmy.world
      0·
      3 months ago

      DNSNet, it’s a FOSS app on F-Droid, works on pretty much all apps, as it acts like a vpn but runs entirely locally.

    • Lena@gregtech.euEnglish
      0·
      3 months ago

      Brave, yes the CEO is a piece of shit and it has some suspicious crypto stuff but whatever if it keeps the company afloat. The browser itself is good, the best mobile browser I’ve used. Don’t give the company money in any way however.

    • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.netEnglish
      0·
      3 months ago

      I use a pihole when I’m home, and ghostery browser for link handling when I’m out. It’s incredibly basic so not great for a primary browser, but has Adblock and tracking protection, plus auto-declines cookies, so great for link handling. (I could set up a vpn but I’m incredibly lazy)

      I don’t think ghostery browser is still maintained, but because it uses the same lists as their Firefox extension, it still works like a charm.

      Also if you want to keep using Firefox, you can try the ghostery extension as well, assuming you are on android where that’s an option (I’m not which is why I use the browser)

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.caEnglish
      0·
      3 months ago

      The internet is also becoming advertising hell. I go to a website to read a 400 word article or blog post and my browser will take one or two minutes to load as it tries to remove ads, cookie requests, pop-ups, redirects, videos, or any other additions … so that I can spend two minutes reading the content that I want. About 20% of the time, the site breaks or doesn’t even appear, so I skip it and move on after having spent 4 minutes wasting my time.

        • IninewCrow@lemmy.caEnglish
          0·
          3 months ago

          At least two or three times a week my wife will ask me about a website she saw on Facebook … and the site you just showed me is the type of crap that would appear.

          The internet is slowly filling up with nonsense websites with psueodo information that is driving down human intelligence … all in an effort to gain a few pennies in advertising.

    • MMNT@lemmy.ml
      0·
      3 months ago

      Check which blocking lists you have. I use the same and don’t see any ads

    • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
      0·
      3 months ago

      I just use the adguard dns IP as my private dns router. I know it’s not the best way, but it works for me. No ads anywhere on my phone.

  • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    0·
    3 months ago

    Maybe when they were coding the CMB, the simulation designers made a slight error in factoring in the effects of universal expansion. Maybe they even realized the error, but thought, “who is going to build a billion dollar telescope and have it spend years investigating the details of the skybox?”

  • magic_lobster_party@fedia.io
    0·
    3 months ago

    Isn’t this what has been attributed as evidence supporting the timescape model? It’s an alternative explanation for dark energy, in which it argues time is not the same in all places of universe.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      3 months ago

      I don’t think this is considered evidence supporting Timescape yet, but it could be and it is being investigated.

  • voodooattack@lemmy.world
    0·
    3 months ago

    Off topic: no full screen popover showing up to ask me to subscribe/disable adblocker/accept cookies? What is this site and how do I give them money?

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    0·
    3 months ago

    I fully expect scientists of the 25th century to roll our current level of knowledge of the universe in one with flat earth and geocentrism.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      3 months ago

      But how could light pass through nothing? Surely there must exist a lumeniferous aether!

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        0·
        3 months ago

        Exactly. People have been convinced of numerous “scientific” ideas over the centuries that later turned out to be totally bogus. “Dirt creates vermin”.

        And maybe, in a few decades or centuries, they laugh at the notion of Dark Matter. Or what the stupid cavepeople of the 21st century still believed was gravity or speed of light.

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      3 months ago

      I really hope they’re not stupid enough to be so judgemental or we’re gonna be in real trouble in the 25th century.

    • Spawn7586@lemmy.world
      0·
      3 months ago

      I mean, the recent discoveries actually do not dispute most of the previous theories. Most of the time the old theories are fringe cases where some parameters are simplified so you get the new theory that is actually a general case of the classical one. It’s not like our old formulas stop working when we discover new cases…

    • exasperation@lemm.eeEnglish
      0·
      3 months ago

      If you’re interested in this stuff, Thomas Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions describes a lot of how science actually happens, where most normal science builds up accumulated information under an accepted paradigm, but occasionally those old models slowly become untenable with repeated observations that are anomalous or not explained by that existing accepted scientific paradigm. Then a scientific revolution occurs, the old paradigm is cast aside or limited in its scope, while the new paradigm takes over as the generally accepted set of theories. The book is one of the most cited works of the post-war era.

      Geocentrism Heliocentrism didn’t have a clear advantage over Heliocentrism geocentrism, until Kepler made the observation that the planetary orbits were elliptical. (One big objection to geocentrism was that the stars should have some kind of observable parallax if the earth were moving around the sun, but that ended up being explained by learning just how freaking far away the stars are.) Heliocentrism with elliptical orbits, though, laid the groundwork for Newton’s theory of gravitation.

      Later on, Mercury’s anomalous orbit just couldn’t be made to fit Newton’s theory, but astronomers held onto Newton’s theories for decades before Einstein’s general relativity was enough to explain it. Einstein’s own cosmological theories needed to be fit in with the discovery of the cosmic background radiation and our expanding universe, and eventually we got to our current paradigm of the lambda-CDM model, which postulates the existence of dark matter to account for galactic structures, dark energy to account for the acceleration of the expansion of the universe. All along the way, there were discarded theories that just don’t hold up.

      The history of how we got here can help inform how we should speculate about where we might go next. New normal science might try to figure out what dark matter actually is (different theories can be tested by looking for different observations), without actually challenging the overarching lambda-CDM model. Or research into the Hubble Tension might allow enough observation to propose a new model entirely, for a revolution into a new paradigm.

      And of course, Kuhn wrote his hugely influential book in 1962, so many decades of thought have refined and challenged some of those ideas. It’s interesting stuff.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    0·
    3 months ago

    This is really exciting stuff, tbh. It’s kinda amazing that in a world where the frontiers have been settled, most fields have had a century to a thousand years of refinement, there are still areas of science where we have giant gaps in our knowledge, like scientists first discovering gravity, or the circumference of Earth.

    Someone, perhaps someone who is already alive, is going to discover new math or observations that fundamentally change how we see the universe, with far reaching implications on cosmic exploration, travel the birth and death of our universe, and (I’m sure) many commercial applications.