• aggelalex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    This is the primary reason why people aren’t having children imo. This and that the system isn’t contributing enough

  • BillCheddar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Now you see why billionaire capitalists want as many people to have children as possible.

    They want slaves by any means necessary.

  • insanemantis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    And if you can’t take care of your kids or protect them

    The billionaires will just kidnap and eat them

    God I hate this timeline with a blind rage

    • possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 minutes ago

      Fosters aren’t cannibals, well, most of them at least. What they will do is kidnap them and place them with a foster family who is being paid to turn your child into a profitable slave asset for capitalism.

  • UnpoppedCorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    This is what it means to be responsible. It’s no longer just about you, but something more. Some people find that suffocating. Others find it liberating.

    • PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Very true, and in a pretty surprising turn, most folks really only know how they respond once they get there.

      But to the point, the biggest cause of variance between the two is just available resources. Responsibility spans the dial between powerful lived experience of wholesome capability and crippling mortal burden from which no escape but death is available. I’d say that dial is twisted more by support / resources / precarity than by individual characteristics, certainly more than an individual’s willingness to “rise to the occasion” or similar.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    True, but it’s not a having kids problem. It’s a capitalism problem, as usual.

    The same case could be made for hobbies. You need money for hobbies, so they trap you in the system.

    Destroy capitalism and suddenly having kids is great (relatively speaking, subject to personal preferences).

    • emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      There’s a reason the right wing is always trying to ban birth control/abortion, push those trashy ‘16 and pregnant’ shows, complain about teen pregnancy rates being down, want to legalize child marriage and child labor. Kids are just one way that capitalism traps you into being dependent on the system and desperate. For those in the US health insurance is another. And over-reliance on cars. They love to put a recurring cost on anything that’s necessary to maintaining your survival/quality of life, because then you’re dependent on perpetuating the system.

    • CriticalThought@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The same case could be made for hobbies. You need money for hobbies, so they trap you in the system.

      I don’t think this is quite right. If you want to make changes in your life, you’re free to abandon your hobbies in ways that you are not free to abandon your children.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think OOP is referring specifically to the cultural pressures everywhere telling you that you need to have kids. The people pushing that the most are conservatives who are straight up puppets for billionaires

        • UnequalExchange@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Also more soldiers to send off on needless wars like the Vietnam War, Korean War, Iran War , Afghan War, etc…

          All the wars Injust mentioned didnt substantially change any of the lives of the peoples of the countries that participated in them.

          Vietnam is still a somewhat socialistic state, North Korea and South Korea still exist till today, Iran is still ruled miliarily by the IRGC and parliamentarily by the Iranian clerical elites, and the Afghanis still dont care at all about nato and are rulled by the Taliban…

          Just more soldiers into thhe needless meat grinders, and more slaves and consumers to do the bidding of the richest people in society.

          There will be more and more needless wars with dozens of innocent , impressionable adults thrown into the different meat grinders. There will be mroe and more people turned into personal toys for the rich or into their slaves and consumers …

          It is not until the average person gets fed up and knowledgable about how this circular and awful system fucks them , their loved ones, their communities and the kids of their communities over and says "No More! " will we see a substantial change to be subsubstantiated.

      • John@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        A hobby that makes money is a job, once you start to depend on it it starts being stressful and stops being a hobby. I’ve been through that cycle a couple of times.

      • adamhepner@szmer.info
        link
        fedilink
        Polski
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve completed sailing course recently, and I’m still in awe that one of activities that the instructors do in their spare time is handling the private yachts between ports, like bringing one from Greece to Spain. Seems like an awesome side gig.

    • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Destroy capitalism and suddenly having kids is great

      Depends on the system. The reason why capitalism has proliferated is it allows selfishness, which is part of human nature. Honestly, is there a better economic system, which also rewards selfishness like capitalism?

      • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The main reason why capitalism has proliferated is because capitalists slaughtered everyone who opposed it at first. Millions killed across all of Europe, simply for defending their homes and common land from being taken by the Church and aristocracy.

        After resistance was crushed, and people no longer owned anything, they had no choice but to work as slaves for capitalists. Ever since then, they have constantly been pitting us against each other, and we’ve had no choice but to play their game, since otherwise it’s homelessness or death.

        People tend to be a whole lot less selfish if they don’t need to struggle for survival, and if they’re not brainwashed into thinking it has to be this way from early childhood.

        In every single study and poll, results consistently show that close to nobody supports capitalism, and nearly everyone is perfectly willing to share fairly, so that we can all live well.

        Selfishness is not human nature. At least not for the majority of people. Cooperation, sharing, and helping others are. It might not be obvious, because capitalists have been forcefully beating it out of us for the last 500 years.

        But it doesn’t matter. Capitalists hold all the power, as they’ve always had, and will sooner die than let any meaningful change take place. Governments would rather order the military to shoot protesters than listen to any anti-capitalist points.

        We’re not allowed to question anything about capitalism. It’s the worst, most destructive religion anyone has ever come up with and forced onto others, built on the most asinine dogmas possible.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    In general, serious commitments of any kind limit your life choices. “Entrapment” is when someone else tricks you into it.

    • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, but she’s right in that employers definitely exploit that sometimes. They know you can’t just walk away from a raw deal on a whim because while you may be willing to risk yourself, they’re keenly aware that most aren’t willing to risk their children’s food and shelter

          • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            They know you can’t just walk away from a raw deal on a whim because while you may be willing to risk yourself, they’re keenly aware that most aren’t willing to risk their children’s food and shelter

            yeah, backwater shit all over

    • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Thank you. Every choice in life limits other choices. Yes when you have children, you then have to care for them. What lifestyle you must live is up to you though. The ones that must keep up with whoever is the ‘in group’ are always going to have a harder time than those to learn to go for what they really want and need in life and not what a TikTok tells them they do.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah being a “dink” or even just solo and childless/free used to be a ticket to easy street, now it’s just regular street.

      • UnequalExchange@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I feel as if this further justifies universal access to voluntary birth control, abortions, and sterilizations globally.

        Because all because someone and their parrtner(s) have a breeding kink that doesnt mean thatt they have the time, psyche , or money to raise a child. Esoecially in today’s world where living paycheque to paycheque is the default for most people. So that means all humans have gained the right to delay producing children , even forever, cause how do we know if things will improve economically? Things probably wont improve. The majority of humanity has seemed to be OK with this current ‘paycheque-to-paycheque’ status quo for decades…so…

    • myyass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I get down voted a lot on this subject but people really have no idea what goes on in schools. It’s like I had teachers tell me don’t get into teaching, I’m stubborn, and well yeah they were right. In an ideal world, it would be great. The reality is you have good days and you have the where’s the 4L bottle of vodka that was posted today.

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The only people who seem to like the school system are the administrators and board members. Everybody else from the students to the parents to the teachers finds it terrible.

    • waterwasamistake@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      See thats another reason why i don’t have kids, its an mlm. After i am done with the hamsterwheel, my kids can jump in and would be caught up in it to care for me? No thanks.

      People working with the old know very well that having kids will not guarantee you actual help when you are old, which often is just dew to circumstance and not even malice.

      There are some positives to having kids, most of them emotional but they are objectivly a very bad deal in all other aspects.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      And if you think that is a good reason to have kids you should never be even close to one. The only worse reason I could imagine is “their kidneys will be compatible when I need one”

      • Prior_Industry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        I didn’t mention kids though did I, that is your own assumption of what I meant.

        My comment is on entering a “system” which you feel entrapped by. Old age, unless you are very lucky is going to lead to the exact same result as this person is bemoaning about parenthood. The irony being you often enter a kid like state yourself, dependent on others turning up for you.

        But if you want to know, I agree that you should not have the kids with the expectation they are going to have to care for you.