• Tiresia@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Calories aren’t metric. 1 calorie is 4.184 Joules.

    Also, a calorie is only 0.99857% of the energy needed to raise a gram of water (without gas dissolved in it) from freezing to boiling at 101325 Pascal of gas pressure, not 1% as the OOP states. 101325 Pascal perhaps being better known by the non-metric unit “1 atmosphere”.

  • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The only thing that really grinds my gears with metric enthusiasts is their inability to use the system they say they love. I can’t tell you how many times I see these chucklefucks say something is “400 millimeters” when there is a fucking measurement for that. Just say “4 decimeters”, god damn double plus bad ignorant asses.

    • rbos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yep. Those numbers on the periodic table tell you how many grams one mole is. I think one of them is the average isotopic valie and the other is the ideal value.

  • Zedd @lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Fahrenheit is good for exactly one thing: temperature for humans. It’s about the smallest difference in temperature that a human can feel. Anything 0F or below is too fucking cold for humans. Anything 100F or above is too fucking hot for humans. So instead of basing the temperature on what water does out of 100, Fahrenheit bases on how a human feels. Stupid for science, great for humans.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        “my system is the best and i will never change my mind”

        – person who has only ever been exposed to the one system

    • bjorney@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s not any better than Celsius though - you are only saying that because you are familiar with Fahrenheit.

      Celsius

      • 0 - freezing
      • 10 - cold
      • 20 - room temp
      • 30 - hot
      • 40 - miserably hot
      • 100 - boiling
      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Nah, the higher resolution of Fahrenheit is simply better for measuring and communicating ambient temperatures.

        • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The higher resolution of Fahrenheit is wasted on the absolutely subjective experience of ambient temperatures, especially when taking humidity into the equation. At least there is a feelable difference between 20 and 22 °C.

      • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I think the larger granularity is better when talking about specifically the feeling of air temperature, if for no other reason than it keeps it to whole numbers for the sake of conversation. 76f is a pretty common temperature where I live for a lot of the year. Saying 24c is technically inaccurate, that’s noticeably colder at 75f. Saying 24.4c in a regular conversation is psychotic.

        • richieadler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          We know that anything resembling knowledge in the mouth of an USian can result in bullying by the nearest jock. It’s reason enough to be afraid.

        • wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Saying 24.4c in a regular conversation is psychotic.

          Doing so is accurate, which many neurodivergent people lean toward, and generally don’t appreciate being called “psychotic”, FYI. Maybe tune that hyperbole —and no, “retarded” isn’t an acceptable alternative, either.

    • Asetru@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      This assumes for whatever reasons that non-scientists could not have any reason to ever calculate anything with temperature.

      If you use °C for a week or two, you’ll get used to what numbers are hot and which ones are cold. But if you ever calculate anything in imperial units for a week or two, you’ll still want to bite your table.

    • wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Anything 0F or below is too fucking cold for humans. Anything 100F or above is too fucking hot for humans.

      … Tell me you’re a privileged US resident w/o using those words. 😶

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      No, that’s ridiculous and arbitrary. 100 degrees Fahrenheit is already way past too fucking hot and zero is far below too fucking cold. Zero to thirty degrees Celsius is a solid cold-to-hot range. 100°C to boil water, a very common human activity, makes far more sense than 212°F, too.