• rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    LOL private chat with 8 people.

    You don’t even need a Derek, all you have to do is have one of the 8 perceive that they are being wronged. One’s mate makes googly eyes at another, next thing you know, it’s all public.

    Never post anything anywhere if it ever getting out will fuck you.

    Nothing is private and you should strive to be the kind of person that doesn’t say shit about other people behind their backs.

  • Letsdothisok@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Wow. Derrick is a dirty pu–y. Screw you, Derrick, you don’t even know us. This is why no one likes you, Derrick.

  • 3DMVR@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    I would never feel bad about that, have you ever had girls show you their gcs? I’m traumatized

  • AidsKitty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Be careful who you trust and only post things online that you wouldn’t mind everyone in your life seeing. Never trust the internet.

  • SoupBrick@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    I really thought this was going to be a satire post about the Yemen bombing Signal chat group leak based off the reddit title.

  • peregrin5@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I thought this was going to be satire about the Atlantic editor being accidentally included in war room group chats. Lol.

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        “Hmmm should I expose all the offensive photoshops and derogatory things they did said about specific people?” No that’s not narcissist by itself.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          They hurt everyone else involved intentionally do to a sense of self richeousness. It’s a textbook definition of narcicism.

          If someone calls the person they are going through a breakup with a self richeous dingbat who likes to tear down everyone around them in a private chat it’s not a nice thing to do. It also didn’t hurt that person until Derek brought it to their attention in an attempt to hurt the speaker while upsetting/hurting the person who was called names. Especially digging up things from years ago. These people aren’t running for office, they are kids dealing with life in a place of privacy. The number of people I’ve heard call soneone a little dicked asshole who isn’t good in bed is around 50. Never once would I think spreading that information to them or their friends group would be for the greater good. The person is hurt and lashing out. It’s often best to let them recover and sort out their own situation. If they were making plans to harm someone that’s another story, but that isn’t what happened here it appears.

          • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            I don’t know about you, but I am very reluctant to insult others, even in private conversations, even if they might deserve it

            I always try to approach things constructively, because in the end, those patterns and thoughts bleed out into the world and your behaviour

            And do keep in mind, even from the poster’s side of the story, it sounds pretty darn bad, and people have a tendency to downplay their side’s wrongdoings and elevate the other side’s. Chances are, it was probably quite bad

            If there’s people in my life that go around talking badly about other like that, even in private… yeah, I’d want to stay the hell away from them too. It’s just a massive warming sign, and you’re going to be the target sooner or later. And you don’t want a coordinated group acting in bad faith against you

          • someguy3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            At the point of sharing photos and Photoshopping someone to ridicule them, this isn’t an offhand comment said in frustration. This is planned and executed ridicule and mockery. He’s exposing the people for who they are because he thought their “friends” should know who they are and what they are doing. Not for the intent of “hurting everyone else involved intentionally due to a sense of self righteousness”. Whether you agree with what he thought or not, it’s not narcissism (by itself).

            It’s also super bizarre that you want privacy for them when they are fucking sharing photos (the context reading they were private) and sharing “raunchy texts”. Where was the privacy for their victims huh? They deserve what they got.

            • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              At the point of sharing photos and Photoshopping someone to ridicule them, this isn’t an offhand comment said in frustration. This is planned and executed ridicule and mockery.

              i mean, we also don’t know what they are. It could be really bad, but it could also be harmless shitposting among the community.

              • someguy3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 days ago

                You can look at the descriptors they chose to use, and that’s very likely playing it down big time. I’m betting it was extremely bad.

                • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  yeah, but we also don’t know what they are posting, so it’s equally shitty to assume that what they are posting is substantially bad.

                  Though assuming by the fallout, it seems like it was pretty bad? But then again i’ve seen friend groups break up over smaller shit.

    • SleafordMod@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      If you find out that someone cheated on their wife, do you have to keep it private to protect the cheater’s “privacy”?

      Maybe it’s better if that person’s wife knows the truth.

    • pseudo@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Indeed, just like being a bad person is not fine if you keep your bad behavior private.

    • Denixen@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      True, but it is oh so satisfying when bad things happen to shitty people. Especially people finding out the true depth of their shitty. Even more satisfying when they complain about it.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      What a bad dichotomy.

      It’s not the same as “violating someone’s privacy” because that implies that these people shared something deliberately with someone they trusted, that wasn’t the case, this was stupid people posting shitty, hateful, vindictive or exploitative material in a semi-open space and not being careful about who they invite in. Fuck them, they deserve this lesson.

  • Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I suddenly feel better about my group chats, it’s all gay memes, positivity and anti-capitalist revolution.